![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Aims: To assess whether differences exist in nocturnal blood pressure (BP) levels and the diurnal BP change when using fixed time and wrist actigraphy methods to define the night-time period.
Methods: Untreated hypertensive (n = 48) and normotensive (n = 33) subjects (mean age 67 years: range 29–90) underwent simultaneous 24–h ambulatory BP monitoring and wrist actigraph monitoring. The diurnal BP change and nocturnal BP levels were assessed using two fixed night-time definition—a reference period of 22.00-06.59 and also 00.00-05.59, as well as unedited and edited actigraph values and cumulative sums (cusums) analysis.
Results: The reference definition of night-time 22.00-06.59 resulted in the highest values for night-time BP compared to other definitions (p < 0.05), although actigraph defined night-time BP values were not significantly different from the more restrictive definition of night-time (00.00-05.59). Restrictive night-time, edited and unedited actigraph and cusums values for the day-night difference were all significantly greater than the value calculated using the reference night-time period. Dipping status changed significantly depending on which definition of night-time was used.
Conclusions: Significant differences exist in nocturnal BP levels and circadian change between the various methods for defining night-time. The routine use of wrist actigraphy does not however appear to alter the value of night-time BP levels when compared to a more restrictive fixed-time definition of night-time.
Key Words: