Consumer and service determinants of completion of a consumer self-rating outcome measure

REFERENCES

• Trauer T. Issues in the assessment of outcome in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 32: 337–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham C, Coombs T, Buckingham B, Eagar K, Trauer T, Callaly T. The Victorian Mental Health Outcomes Measurement Strategy. Consumer Perspectives on Future Directions for Outcome Self‐Assessment. Department of Human Services, Victoria 2001, Report of the Consumer Consultation Project
   Google Scholar
• Eisen SV, Grob MC, Dill DL. Outcome measurement: tapping the patient's perspective. Psychiatric Treatment: Advances in Outcome Research, SM Mirin, JT Gossett, MC Grob. American Psychiatric Press, DC 1991; 213–235
   Google Scholar
• Eagar K, Buckingham B, Coombs T, et al. Outcome Measurement in Adult Area Mental Health Services: Implementation Resource Manual. Department of Human Services Victoria, Melbourne 2000
   Google Scholar
• Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council National Mental Health Working Group. National Outcomes and Casemix Collection. Technical Specification of State and Territory Reporting Requirements for the Outcomes and Casemix Components of ‘Agreed Data’ under National Mental Health Information Development Funding Agreements. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra 2002
   Google Scholar
• Eisen SV, Leff HS, Schaefer E. Implementing outcome systems: lessons from a test of the BASIS‐32 and the SF‐36. Journal of Behavioral Health Service and Research 1999; 26: 18–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self‐report. Archives of General Psychiatry 1976; 33: 1111–1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauer T, Callaly T. Concordance between mentally ill clients and their case managers using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Australasian Psychiatry 2002; 10: 24–28
   Google Scholar
• Graham C, Coombs T, Buckingham W, Eagar K, Trauer T, Callaly T. Consumer Perspectives of Future Directions for Outcome Self‐Assessment. Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2001, Report of the Consumer Consultation Project
   Google Scholar
• Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SBG, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham W, Burgess P, Solomon S, Pirkis J, Eagar K. Casemix Classification of Mental Health Services. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra 1998
   Google Scholar
• Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patient‐report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1994; 45: 242–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaly T, Trauer T, Hantz P. HBL. HoNOS, BASIS‐32 and LSP16. Barwon Health, Geelong 2000
   Google Scholar
• Callaly T, Trauer T, Hantz P. Integration of outcome measures into clinical practice. Australasian Psychiatry 1998; 6: 188–190
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The ICD‐10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. WHO, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• Trauer T. Analysis of outcome measurement data from the four Victorian ‘Round One’ agencies. Melbourne 2003, unpublished report
   Google Scholar
• Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software. Release 8.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson FB. Assessing clinical outcomes: the community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 897–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman N, Lin I ‐F, Weinstein M, Lin Y ‐H. Evaluating the quality of self‐reports of hypertension and diabetes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2003; 56: 148–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen SV, Dickey B, Sederer LI. A self‐report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients' involvement in treatment. Psychiatric Services 2000; 51: 349–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allenby A, Matthews J, Beresford J, McLachlan S. The application of computer touch‐screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting. European Journal of Cancer Care 2002; 11: 245–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health‐related quality of life data: validity, time, benefits, and patient preference. Quality of Life Research 2001; 10: 15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greist JH, Klein MJ, Erdman HP, et al. Comparison of computer‐ and interviewer‐ administered versions of the diagnostic interview schedule. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1987; 38: 1304–1311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein JF, Barker PR, Kroutil LA. Mode effects in self‐reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly 2001; 65: 529–549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1997; 38: 581–586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar