Publishing ethics in psychiatry

References

• Edwards R B. ethics of psychiatry: insanity, rational autonomy, and mental health care, R B Edwards. Prometheus, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S, Chodoff P, Green S A. Psychiatric ethics3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S. A letter from Jerusalem: some questions on the future of the scientific Journal. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 32: 157–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• US Office of Research Integrity. http://ori.dhhs.gov/regguide.htm. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• UK Medical Research Council. http://www.mrc.ac.uk. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• World Association of Medical Editors. http://www.wame.org. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Journal. http://www.com. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997; 126: 36–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R. Misconduct in research: editors respond –the Committee on Publication Ethics is formed. British Medical Journal 1997; 315: 201–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts J G. Publishing in our Journals: ethics and honesty. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1991; 19: 163–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker K L. Editorial: implementing ethical guidelines for publication of research in Endocrine Society Journals. Endocrinology 1994; 134: 3–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie D. Editorial peer review in biomedical publication: the first international congress. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263: 1317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie D, Flanagin A. The second international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie D, Flanagin A. Congress on biomedical peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998; 280: 213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susser M, Yankauer A. Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and editorial decisions. American Journal of Public Health 1993; 83: 792–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter G. Salami: kosher and unkosher [letter]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 33: 766–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Saleh M T, Ghubash R. The prevalence of early postpartum psychiatric morbidity in Dubai: a transcultural perspective. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1997; 95: 428–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghubash R, Abou-Saleh M T. Postpartum psychiatric illness in Arab culture: prevalence and psychosocial correlates. British Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 171: 65–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr A. Original publications. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson G. Duplicate publication. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claghorn J L, Kiev A, Rickels K, Smith W T, Dunbar G C. Paroxetine vs. placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1992; 53: 434–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar G C, Claghorn J L, Kiev A, Rickels K, Smith W T. A comparison of paroxetine and placebo in depressed outpatients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1993; 87: 302–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelenberg A J, Ottosson J O. Duplicate publication. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1995; 56: 81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelenberg A J, Ottosson J O. Editorial statement. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1995; 91: 145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schone W, Ludwig M. A double-blind study of paroxetine compared with fluoxetine in geriatric patients with major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 1993; 13(Suppl. 12)34S–39S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schone W, Ludwig M. Paroxetine in der Depressionalsbehandlung geriatrischer Patienten –eine doppelblinde Vergleichsstudie mit Fluoxetin. Fortschritte der. Neurologie Psychiatrie 1994; 62: 16–8, [Sonderheft]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geretsegger C, Bohmer F, Ludwig M. Paroxetine in the elderly depressed patient: randomised comparison with fluoxetine of efficacy, cognitive and behavioural effects. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1994; 9: 25–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shader R I, Greenblatt D J. Twice may be too many: redundant publications. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 1996; 16: 1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potkin S G, Cannon H E, Murphy D L, Wyatt R J. Are paranoid schizophrenics different from other schizophrenics?. New England Journal of Medicine 1978; 298: 61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajari K J. Monoamine oxidase in schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 1978; 298: 1150
   Google Scholar
• Berger P A, Ginsberg R A, Barchas J D, Murphy D L, Wyatt R J. Platelet monoamine oxidase in chronic schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry 1978; 135: 95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potkin S G, Cannon H E, Murphy D L, Wyatt R J. Monoamine oxidase in schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 1978; 298: 1151
   Google Scholar
• Relman A. Schizophrenia and publication. New England Journal of Medicine 1978; 298: 1152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbok P. Ethical considerations relating to writing a medical scientific paper for publication. Childs Nervous System 1995; 11: 323–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culliton B J. Harvard psychiatrist resigns. Science 1988; 242: 1239–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock S, Wells F. Fraud and misconduct in medical research2nd edn. BMJ Publishing, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Mulley G P. Differential diagnosis of dementia. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 1986; 292: 1416–1418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly A AP. Differential diagnosis of dementia. The Physician 1987; 6: 22–26
   Google Scholar
• Gelb J L. Reality defended. Australasian Psychiatry 1995; 3: 26–28
   Google Scholar
• Ofshe R, Watters E. Making monsters: false memories, psychotherapy and sexual hysteria. Scribner, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Gelb J L. Apology. Australasian Psychiatry 1995; 3: 319
   Google Scholar
• Wachslicht-Rodbard H, Gross H A, Rodbard D, Ebert M H, Roth J. Increased insulin binding to erythrocytes in anorexia nervosa. New England Journal of Medicine 1980; 300: 882–887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soman V R, Felig P. Insulin binding to monocytes and insulin sensitivity in anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Medicine 1980; 68: 66–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad W, Wade N. Betrayers of the truth. Simon and Schuster, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Kohn A. False prophets. Blackwell, Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A. The impact of fradulent research on the scientific literature: the Stephen E. Breuning case. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263: 1424–1426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning S E, Davis V J, Matson J L, Ferguson D G. Effects of thioridazine and withdrawal dyskinesias on workshop performance of mentally retarded young adults. American Journal of Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1447–1454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aman M G, Teehan C J, White A J, Turbott S H, Vaithianathan C. Haloperidol treatment with chronically medicated residents: dose effect on clinical behaviour and reinforcement contingencies. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1989; 93: 452–460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poling A. The consequences of fraud. Research fraud in the behavioral and biomedical sciences, D J Miller, M Hersen. Wiley, New York 1992; 140–157
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 277: 925–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter E. The snake on the Caduceus: dimensions of medical and psychiatric responsibility in the Third Reich. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1993; 27: 149–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl S M, Thiemann S, Faull K F, Barchas J D, Berger P A. Neurochemistry of dopamine in Huntington's Dementia and normal ageing. Archives of General Psychiatry 1986; 43: 161–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl S M, Thiemann S, Faull K F, Barchas J D, Berger P A. Retraction. Archives of General Psychiatry 1989; 46: 758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good manners win out. Nature 1994; 375: 2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey W L. Bad manners, not good. Nature 1995; 376: 545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Sun C E, Walczak C A, et al. Evidence for a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 6pter-p22. Nature Genetics 1995; 10: 41–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm-Reichman F. Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry 1948; 11: 263–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill J. Whatever became of the schizophrenogenic mother?. American Journal of Psychotherapy 1990; 44: 499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell C E. The schizophrenogenic mother concept in American psychiatry. Psychiatry 1996; 59: 274–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing L. The history of ideas of autism: legends, myths and realities. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice 1997; 1: 13–24
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Position statement: conflict of interest. Medical Journal of Australia 1993; 159: 57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman K J. Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269: 2782–2784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton R. Conflict of interest in clinical research: opprobrium or obsession?. Lancet 1997; 349: 1112–1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farthing M JG. Ethics of publication. How to write a paper, G M Hall. BMJ Publishing, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Engler R L, Covell J W, Friedman P J, Kitcher P S, Peters R M. Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research. New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 317: 1383–1389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson C. American Medical Association manual of style9th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1998
   Google Scholar
• Australian Medical Association. Code of Ethics 1998; http://domino.ama.com.au. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. The principles of medical ethics. APA, Washington 1998
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. The RANZCP Code of Ethics. RANZCP, Melbourne 1998
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct 1992; http://www.apa.org. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. Code of Ethics 1997; http://www.apa.psychsociety.com.au. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty: http://www.forskraad.dk/spec-udv/uvvu/. Accessed February 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Horton R. The Journal ombudsman: a step toward scientific press oversight. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998; 280: 298–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Biology Editors. ethics and policy in scientific publication. Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda 1990
   Google Scholar
• Lock S. The future of medical Journals. BMJ Publishing, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bingham C M, Higgins G, Coleman R, Van Der Weyden M B. The Medical Journal of Australia internet peer-review study. Lancet 1998; 352: 441–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majerus P. Fraud in medical research. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1982; 70: 213–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman D X. The meaning of full disclosure. Archives of General Psychiatry 1988; 45: 689–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S. Statistical methods of the detection of fraud. Fraud and misconduct in medical research2nd edn., S Lock, F Wells. BMJ Publishing, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Lafollette M C. Stealing into print: fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. University of California Press, Berkeley 1992
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C. Bill would force Journals to follow misconduct rules. Nature 1992; 357: 7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingelfinger F J. Peer review in biomedical publication. American Journal of Medicine 1974; 56: 686–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial peer review in biomedical publication: the first international congress. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263: 1317–1441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The second international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 91–173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The third international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998; 280: 213–301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn J. Publication: an ethical imperative. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 1313–1315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar