A conceptual review of functioning: implications for the development of consumer outcome measures

References

• Australian Health Ministers. Second national mental health plan. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra 1998
   Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Peters L, Teesson M. Measurement of consumer outcome in mental health: a report to the National Mental Health Information Strategy Committee. Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety Disorders, Sydney 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stedman T, Yellowlees P, Mellsop G, Clarke R, Drake S. Measuring consumer outcomes in mental health. Field testing of selected measures of consumer outcomes in mental health. Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra 1997
   Google Scholar
• Trauer T, Callaly T, Hantz P, Little J, Shields R, Smith J. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: results of the Victorian field trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 380–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauer T. Issues in the assessment of outcome in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 32: 337–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony W A. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1993; 16: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Strauss J S. Sense of self in recovery from severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 65: 131–145
   Google Scholar
• Deegan P. Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1996; 19: 91–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp C A. The strengths model: case management with people suffering from severe and persistent mental illness. Oxford University Press, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council's National Mental Health Working Group. National standards for mental health services. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra 1996
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A G. The foundation-functional measures, part 1: what is function, what should we measure, and how should we measure it?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992; 46: 183–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katschnig H. How useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry?. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 1997; 10: 337–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman A F. Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1996; 31: 78–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps (ICIDH). World Health Organization, Geneva 1980
   Google Scholar
• Engel G L. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980; 137: 535–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma D. Measuring social disabilities in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1996; 31: 101–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janca A, Kastrup M, Katschnig H, Lopez-Ibor J J, Mezzich J EJ, Sartorius N. The World Health Organization Short Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS-S): a tool for the assessment of difficulties in selected areas of functioning of patients with mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1996; 31: 349–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, McGlashan T H. The varied outcomes of schizophrenia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 42: 34–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Cooper J E, van Duuren-Kristen S, Kennedy C, Hendershot G, Sartorius N. Revision of the ICIDH. Mental health aspects. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 202–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning and disablement, ICIDH-2: the international classification of impairments, activities, and participation. World Health Organization, Geneva 1998
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G K. A model of human occupation: theory and application2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1995
   Google Scholar
• Phelan M, Wykes T, Goldman H. Global function scales. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1994; 29: 205–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington 1987
   Google Scholar
• Scott J E, Lehman A F. Social functioning in the community. Handbook of social functioning in schizophrenia, K T Mueser, N Tarrier. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1998; 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Goldman H H, Skodol A E, Lave T R. Revising axis V, for DSM-IV. A review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 149: 1148–1156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson F B. Assessing clinical outcomes: the community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 897–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding C M, Zubin J, Strauss J S. Chronicity in schizophrenia: revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 161: 27–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy-Byrne P, Dagadakis C, Unutzer J, Ries R. Evidence for limited validity of the revised Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychiatric Services 1996; 47: 864–866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing J, Beevor A S, Curtis R H, Park S BG, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein G S. Usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 375–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin S, Singh S P, Croudace T, Jones P, Medley I, Harrison G. Evaluating the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: reliability and validity in a three year follow-up of first-onset psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 399–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Parker G. The Life Skills Profile: a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1989; 15: 325–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace C J. Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1986; 12: 604–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykes T, Sturt E. The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry 1986; 148: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey C A, Curson D A, Pantelis C, Taylor J, Barnes T RE. Four behavioural syndromes of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 1996; 168: 562–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambridge J A, Rosen A. Assertive community treatment for the seriously mentally ill in suburban Sydney: a programme description and evaluation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1994; 28: 438–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. The capacity of a measure of disability (the LSP) to predict hospital readmission in those with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 1995; 25: 157–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard C, Fisher A G, Short M A, Duran L. Occupational performance differences between psychiatric groups. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 6: 119–126
   Google Scholar
• Vorspan R. Activities of daily living in the clubhouse: you can't vacuum in a vacuum. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1988; 12: 15–21
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A G. Functional assessment and occupation: critical issues for occupational therapy. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 45: 13–19
   Google Scholar
• Wing J K, Brown G W. Institutionalism and schizophrenia: a comparative study of three mental hospitals 1960–68. Cambridge University Press, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Sommers A A. Negative symptoms: conceptual and methodological problems. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1985; 11: 364–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delespaul P AEG. Assessing schizophrenia in daily life: the experience sampling method. IPSER, Maastricht 1995
   Google Scholar
• de Vries M W. Recontexualizing psychiatry: toward ecologically valid mental health research. Transcultural Psychiatry 1997; 34: 185–218
   Google Scholar
• Lord J, Schnarr A, Hutchison P. The voice of the people: qualitative research and the needs of the consumers. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health 1987; 6: 25–36
   Google Scholar
• Blankertz L, Cook J A. Choosing and using outcome measures. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1998; 22: 167–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Strauss J S. Beyond the biopsychosocial model: integrating disorder, health and recovery. Psychiatry 1995; 58: 44–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Evaluating activities of daily living: directions for the future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 233–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss J S, Estroff S E. Foreword. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1989; 15: 177–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M K, Ford J. A client-developed functional level scale: the Community Living Skills Scale (CLSS). Journal of Social Service Research 1990; 13: 61–84
   Google Scholar
• Rapp C A, Shera W, Kisthardt W. Research strategies for consumer empowerment of people with severe mental illness. Social Work 1993; 38: 727–735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows G, Harvey C, Fossey E, Burgess P. Assessing perceived need for mental health care in a community survey: development of the Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidmiology 2000; 35: 427–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Hoge M A, Godleski L, Rakfeldt J, Griffith E EH. Hospital or community living? Examining consumer perspectives on deinstitutionalization. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1996; 19: 49–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain R, Rapp C A. A decade of case management: methodological review of outcome research. Community Mental Health Journal 1991; 27: 171–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A G. Multifaceted measurement of daily life task performance: conceptualizing a test of instrumental ADL and validating the addition of personal ADL tasks. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Review 1997; 11: 289–303
   Google Scholar
• Goldman S L, Fisher A G. Cross-cultural validation of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1997; 60: 77–85
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1987; 175: 526–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnworth L, Mostert E, Harrison S, Worrell D. The experience sampling method: its potential use in occupational therapy research. Occupational Therapy International 1996; 3: 1–17
   Google Scholar
• Everett B, Boydell K. A methodology for including consumers' opinions in mental health evaluation research. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1994; 45: 76–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers E S, Palmer-Erbs V. Participatory action research: implications for research and evaluation in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1994; 18: 3–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Birch D E, Langley J, Langile L. Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 2000; 20: 18–44
   Google Scholar