What outcomes to measure in routine mental health services, and how to assess them: a systematic review

References

• Andrews G, Peters L, Teesson M. Measurement of consumer outcome in mental health. Clinical research unit for anxiety disorders. A report to the National Mental Health Information Strategy Committee, D CRUFA. CRUFAD, Sydney 1994
   Google Scholar
• Slade M. Routine outcome assessment in mental health services. Psychological Medicine, (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns T, Priebe S. Mental health care systems and their characteristics: a proposal. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1996; 94: 381–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison G, Eaton W. From research world to real world. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 1999; 12: 187–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood P. Outcomes management –a technology of patient experience. New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 318: 1549–1556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie N, Blanes T, Marks I M. Computerised clinical benefit-cost audit of mental health care II: time input, costs, patient satisfaction. Journal of Mental Health 1995; 1: 71–78
   Google Scholar
• Walter G, Kirkby K C, Marks I M, Whiteford H, Andrews G, Swinson R. Outcome measurement –sharing experiences in Australia. Australasian Psychiatry 1996; 4: 316–318
   Google Scholar
• Lyons J S, Howard K I, O'Mahoney M T, Lish J D. The measurement and management of clinical outcomes in mental health. Wiley, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Dickey B, Azeni H. Data watch: impact of managed care on mental health services. Health Affairs 1992; 11: 197–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Mental health national service framework. HMSO, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• Wing J K, Beevor A S, Curtis R H, Park S B, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman T, Yellowlees P, Mellsop G, Clarke R, Drake S. Measuring consumer outcomes in mental health. Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra 1997
   Google Scholar
• NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews, 2nd edn. University of York, York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Shern D L, Flynn L M. Outcomes roundtable: developing, evaluating and disseminating outcomes monitoring. Behavioural Healthcare Tomorrow 1996; 5: 25–30
   Google Scholar
• Smith G R, Manderscheid R, Flynn L M, Steinwachs D M. Principles for assessment of patient outcomes in mental health care. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 1033–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell J. Consumerism, outcomes and satisfaction: a review of the literature, [Cited 16 August 2002.] Available from URL: http://www.networksplus.net/fhp/madnation/citations/consumerism.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ciarlo J A, Edwards D W, Kiresuk T J, Newman F L, Brown T R. The assessment of client/patient outcomes techniques for use in mental health programs. National Institute of Mental Health, Washington, DC 1981
   Google Scholar
• Attkisson C, Cook J, Karno M, et al. Clinical services research. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1992; 18: 561–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnam M A. Measuring outcomes of care for substance use and mental disorders. New Directions in Mental Health Services 1996; 71: 3–17
   Google Scholar
• Smith G R, Rost K M, Fischer E P, Burnam M A, Burns B J. Assessing the effectiveness of mental health care in routine clinical practice. Evaluation and the Helping Professions 1997; 20: 65–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green R S, Gracely E. Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill. Community Mental Health Journal 1987; 23: 91–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger N, Mattson M, Furberg C. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. LeJacq, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Rothman M. Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. American Review of Public Health 1987; 8: 191–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves W, Shumway M. Effectiveness of mental health services for the severely mentally ill. The future of mental health services research, C Taube, D Mechanic, A Hohmann. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1989; 253–284
   Google Scholar
• Ware J. Measuring health and functional status in mental health services research. The future of mental health services research, C Taube, D Mechanic, A Hohmann. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1989; 289–302
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt A, Attkisson C. Assessing outcomes for sufferers of severe mental disorder: a conceptual framework and review. Evaluation and Program Planning 1993; 16: 347–363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri M, Tansella M. Evaluating outcome in mental health care. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 1995; 8: 116–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sederer L I, Hermann M D, Dickey B. The imperative of outcome assessment in psychiatry. American Journal of Medical Quality 1995; 10: 127–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook J, Jonikas J. Outcomes of psychiatric rehabilitation. New Directions in Mental Health Services 1996; 71: 33–47
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn E. Setting the context for measuring patient outcomes. New Directions in Mental Health Services 1996; 71: 19–32
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser B. New perspectives on outcomes assessment: the philosophy and application of the subjective health process model. Psychotherapy 1996; 33: 284–304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford P. M is for outcome: the CORE outcomes initiative. Journal of Mental Health 1998; 7: 19–24
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M J, Jones D R. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2: 14
   Google Scholar
• Jennings B M, Staggers N, Brosch L R. A classification scheme for outcome indicators. Image Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1999; 31: 381–388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornicroft G, Tansella M. The mental health matrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999
   Google Scholar
• Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Mental health outcome measures, 2nd edn., G Thornicroft, M Tansella. Gaskell, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook D J, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. The Lancet 1999; 354: 1896–1900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K S, ter Riet G, Popay J, Nixon J, Kleijnen J. Phase 5: study quality assessment. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Report No. 4. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness, 2nd edn., K S Khan, G ter Riet, J Glanville, A Sowden, J Kleinen. University of York, NHS CRD, York 2000; 37–50
   Google Scholar
• Howe K, Eisenhart M. Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: a prolegomenon. Educational Researcher 1990; 19: 2–9
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan D R. An uneasy alliance: combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Education Quarterly 1992; Spring: 117–135
   Google Scholar
• Oakley A. Experiments in knowing. gender and method in social sciences. Polity, Cambridge 2000
   Google Scholar
• Seale S, Silverman D. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European Journal of Public Health 1997; 7: 379–384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter E. ‘Freedom's just another word’: Aboriginal youth and mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 29: 374–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie M. Mental health and Maori development. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 33: 5–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks I. Overcoming obstacles to routine outcome measurement. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 173: 281–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbody S M, House A O, Sheldon T A. Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcome measures: national survey. British Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 180: 101–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Thornicroft G, Glover G. The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1999; 34: 243–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaak P F, Van de Lisdonk E H, Bor J H, Hutschemaekers G J. GPs’ referral to mental health care during the past 25 years. British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50: 307–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Blizard R. Quality assurance of outcome in mental health care: a model for routine use in clinical settings. Health Trends 1988; 20: 111–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duggan C, Marks I, Richards D. Clinical audit of behaviour therapy training of nurses. Health Trends 1993; 25: 25–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slade M. The use of patient-level outcomes to inform treatment. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 2002; 11: 20–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggeri M, Biggeri A, Rucci P, Tansella M. Multivariate analysis of outcome of mental health care using graphical chain models. The South-Verona outcome project 1. Psychological Medicine 1998; 28: 1421–1431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks I. Rapid audit of clinical outcome and cost by computer. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 29: 32–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks I M, Blanes T, McKenzie N. Computerised clinical benefit-cost audit of mental health care I: theoretical and practical issues. Journal of Mental Health 1995; 4: 63–70
   Google Scholar
• Marks I. A computerized system to measure treatment outcomes and cost. Psychiatric Services 1996; 47: 811–812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long A, Dixon P. Monitoring outcomes in routine practice: defining appropriate measurement criteria. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1996; 2: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trauer T. Issues in the assessment of outcome in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 32: 337–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry M M, Zissi A. Quality of life as an outcome measure in evaluating mental health services: a review of the empirical evidence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1997; 32: 38–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson E. Assessing clinical outcomes: the community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48: 897–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett C J, Coles E. Psychological health and well-being: why and how should public health specialists measure it? Part 2: stress, subjective well-being and overall conclusions. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1998; 20: 288–294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Handbook of psychiatric measures. American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Slade M, Cahill S, Kelsey W, Powell R, Strathdee G, Valiakalayil A. Threshold 3: the feasibility of the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) for routine assessment of the severity of mental health problems. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2001; 36: 516–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe S, Gruyters T. The role of the helping alliance in psychiatric community care: a prospective study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 1993; 181: 552–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan M, Slade M, Thornicroft G, et al. The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 167: 589–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Powell R, Rosen A, Strathdee G. Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG): the development of a valid and brief scale to assess the severity of mental illness. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2000; 35: 78–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of quality of life. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 1999; 45: 7–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar