References
- Winker M A. The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. Editorial. JAMA 1999; 281(12)1129–30
- Comans M L, Overbeke A J. The structured summary: a tool for reader and editor. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd Decl, 1990; 134(48)2338–43
- Taddio A, Pain T, Fassos F F, Boon H, Ilersich A L, Elinar-Son T R. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ 1994; 150: 1611–15
- Wilczyski N L, Walker C J, McKibbon K A, Haynes R B. Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MEDLINE. Medinfo 1995; 8: 1457–61
- Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 598–604
- Kourilova M, Hulin I. The abstract - why and how it should be written. Bratisl Lek Listy 1989; 90(10)769–74
- Davidson R A. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1: 155–8
- Stelfox H T, Chua G, O'Rourke K, Detsky A S. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium channel antagonists. N Eng J Med 1998; 338: 101–6
- Pitkin R M, Branagan M A. Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. JAMA Jul, 1998; 15(3)280, 267–9