Cost-minimisation analysis of vaginal wall repair in an inpatient or outpatient regimen

References

• Spri. [Day surgery]. Stockholm: Sjukvårdens och socialvårdens planerings – och rationaliseringsinstitut, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Papa Petros PE. Development of generic models for ambulatory vaginal surgery – a preliminary report. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998; 9: 19–27
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. A Short Cot to Better Services – Day Surgery in England and Wales. HMSO, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Heath P, Hall C, Brownlie G. The cost of day surgery. Health Trends. 1990; 22(3)109–11
   Google Scholar
• Mikos T, Downes E. Ambulatory gynaecology: what can we do?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 19: 647–61
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen IS, Kjærgaard J, Sejr T, Sørensen J. [Day surgery – Impact, Organisation, Economics and Experiences]. Copenhagen: DSI – Institut for Health Services Research – Report 97.05, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ottesen M, Sorensen M, Rasmussen Y, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 138–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottesen M, Sorensen M, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Short convalescence after vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82: 359–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottesen M, Utzon J, Kehlet H, Ottesen BS. [Vaginal aurgery in Denmark in 1999–2001. An analysis of operations performed, hospitalization and morbidity]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004; 166: 3598–601
   Google Scholar
• Kidholm K. [Cost of Ambulatory Surgery – S Systematic Literature Review]. Odense University Hospital, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn A, Gelman W, O'Sullivan S, Monga A. The feasibility, efficacy and functional outcome of local anaesthetic repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 124: 88–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axelsen SM, Bek KM. Anterior vaginal wall repair using local anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 112: 214–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axelsen SM, Sørensen J. Ambulatory Operation for Vaginal Prolapse – A Health Technology Assessment. National Board of Health – Centre for Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Copenhagen 2006
   Google Scholar
• Holme JB, Skarderud F, Ahlburg P, Funch-Jensen PM. [Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with the first 300 operations]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005; 167: 2638–40
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen HL, Gogenur I, Jacobsen B, Vilmann P, Rosenberg J. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an outpatient procedure]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005; 167: 2641–3
   Google Scholar
• Bardram L, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Lund CM, Kehlet H. [Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy – two years of experience]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005; 167: 2644–8
   Google Scholar
• Nickelsen TN, Christensen M. [Outpatient treatment. What is the evidence?]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002; 164: 4913–7
   Google Scholar
• Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, second edition, Oxford University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brower W, Rutten F, Koopmanschap M. Costing in economic evaluations. Economic Evaluation in Health Care – Merging Theory with Practice, M Drummond, A McGuire. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001; 68–93
   Google Scholar
• Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997; 6: 327–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsky D, Glick HA, Willke R, Schulman K. Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. Health Econ. 1997; 6: 243–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Århus Universitetshospital. [Price list 2005]. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004: CD004014.
   Google Scholar