Effect of passive uterine straightening during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Edwards RG. Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 60–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1149–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer – can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions?. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 1540–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Setta, AM, Al-Inany, HG, Mansour, RT, Serour, GI, Aboulghar, MA. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3114–21. Epub 22 July 2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Setta AM. Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12: 191–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990; 54: 678–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 878–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvero R, Hearns-Stokes RM, Catherino WH, Leondires MP, Segars JH. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 1848–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327: 557–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorusso, F, Depalo, R, Bettocchi, S, Vacca, M, Vimereati, A, Selvaggi, L. Outcome of in vitro fertilization after transabdominal ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer with a full or empty bladder. Research Papers in Fertility and Reproductive Medicine: Proceedings of the 18th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, (IFFS 2004); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell JD, Wardle PG, Foster PA, Hull MG. Effect of bladder filling on embryo transfer. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1989; 6: 263–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewin A, Schenker JG, Avrech O, Shapira S, Safran A, Friedler S. The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997; 14: 32–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorusso F, Depalo R, Bettocchi S, Vacca M, Vimercati A, Selvaggi L. Outcome of in vitro fertilization after transabdominal ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer with a full or empty bladder. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84: 1046–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu MC. Impact of ‘non-physician factors’ on the ‘physician factor’ of in vitro fertilization success: is it the broth, the cooks, or the statistics?. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71: 998–1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Setta, AM, Mansour, RT, Al-Inany, HG, Aboulghar, MM, Serour, GI, Aboulghar, MA. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound-guidance than with clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2007 ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Egbase PE, al-Sharhan M, al-Othman S, al-Mutawa M, Udo EE, Grudzinskas JG. Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 1687–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazzawi IM, Al-Hasani S, Karaki R, Souso S. Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 677–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcott R, Stanger J. Ultrasound tracking of the movement of embryo-associated air bubbles on standing after transfer. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 2107–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovich JL, Turner SR, Murphy AJ. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1985; 44: 318–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterstone J, Curson R, Parsons J. Embryo transfer to low uterine cavity. Lancet. 1991; 337: 1413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 1042–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD. Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study. BMJ. 1999; 319: 220–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedler S, Lewin A, Schenker JG. Methodology of human embryo transfer following assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993; 10: 393–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Inany, HG, Abou-Setta, AM, Garzo, G. ET catheters for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006. Issue 1 Art. No: CD005636. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005636.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom P, Wramsby H, Persson PH, Liedholm P. Filled bladder simplifies human embryo transfer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984; 91: 506–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991; 337: 867–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson K, Min YL, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results. JAMA. 1992; 267: 374–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, JPT, Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5 (updated May 2005). The Cochrane Library 3. ChichesterUK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2005.
   Google Scholar