Rupture of the scarred uterus

References

• Greene MF. Vaginal birth after cesarean revisited. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2647–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. N Engl J Med. 1916; 104: 1–3
   Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Committee opinion. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:679–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendittelli F. L'exploration systématique par une révision utérine de la cicatrice d'une césarienne segmentaire antérieure lors de la réussite d'une épreuve utérine est-elle justifiée?. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1994; 23: 836
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrotin F, Marret H, Fignon A, Body G, Lansac J. Utérus cicatriciel: la révision systématique de la cicatrice de césarienne après un accouchement par voie vaginale est-elle toujours utile? [Scarred uterus: is routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary?] (in French with English abstract). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1999; 28: 253–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76: 750–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, Wolde-Tsadik G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 927–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan RK, Kinch RA, Ellis B, Anderson R. Trial of labor following cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83: 933–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 689–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 872–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1176–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Goings JR, Fuelberth NJ, Fischermann E, Jones C, Hersh E. Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70: 709–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Lim OW, Jones C, Fallon D, Newman LA, Mantis JK. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158: 1079–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendler I, Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 273–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1184–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JN, Jr, Harris BA, Jr, Huddleston JF, Morrison JC, Propst MG, Wiser WL, et al. Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 146: 255–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory KD, Korst LM, Cane P, Platt LD, Kahn K. Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 985–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul RH. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 297–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan JP, Clark SL, Diaz F, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 157: 1510–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff P, Southmayd K, Read JA. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 71: 380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims EJ, Newman RB, Hulsey TC. Vaginal birth after cesarean: to induce or not to induce. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 1122–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney T, Young DC. Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 39–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett KA, Elmole L, Fleischamn S, Demasio K, Jones D, Copel JA. Increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes with induction of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 130
   Google Scholar
• Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004; 329: 19–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Gaudier FL, Kaunitz AM. Cervical ripening and labor induction after previous cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43: 513–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli A, Regalia AL, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Biffi A, Pezzullo JC. Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section. BJOG. 2004; 111: 1394–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish KM, Holt VL, Connell FA, Williams B, LoGerfo JP. Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138: 119–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Use of hospital discharge data to monitor uterine rupture. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:245–8
   Google Scholar
• Goldman GAKB, Rabinerson D, Biran G, Amster R. Vaginal delivery following cesarean section: the use of oxytocin and prostaglandins. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 18: 328–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chilaka VN, Cole MY, Habayeb OM, Konje JC. Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 24: 264–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Lahav E, Horowitz E, Hod M, Kaplan B. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 116: 173–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinstead J, Grobman WA. Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: predictors of vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 534–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denoual-Ziad C, Hors Y, Delande I, Lezin B, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Comparaison de l'efficacité entre dispositif intravaginal et gel vaginal de dinoprostone dans la maturation cervicale à terme en pratique quotidienne. [Comparative efficacy of vaginal insert and dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening at term in current practice] (in French with English abstract). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2005; 34: 62–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grignaffini A, Soncini E, Anfuso S, Ronzoni E. Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert and intracervical gel for the induction of labor with unripe cervix. Minerva Ginecol. 2004; 56: 413–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuczkowski KM. Uterine rupture: signs and symptoms and the effect of labor analgesia on diagnostic accuracy. J Clin Anesth. 2003; 15: 243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181: 882–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton EF, Bujold E, McNamara H, Gauthier R, Platt RW. Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 620–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar