Audit and feedback: Effects on professional obstetrical practice and healthcare outcomes in a university hospital

References

• Penney G, Foy R. Do clinical guidelines enhance safe practice in obstetrics and gynaecology?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 21: 657–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, Oxford 1972
   Google Scholar
• Belizan M, Meier A, Althabe F, Codazzi A, Colomar M, Buekens P, et al. Facilitators and barriers to adoption of evidence-based perinatal care in Latin American hospitals: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 839–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters E, Doyle J, Jackson N, Howes F, Brunton G, Oakley A. Cochrane Collaboration. Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 285–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Evidence-led obstetric care. Report of a WHO meeting. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, J, Anderson, GM, Domnick-Pierre, K, Vayda, E, Enkin, MW, Hannah, WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11, (Review).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and Feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2006; 2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IK Crombie, Davies, HTO, Abraham, SCS, Florey, C, du, V. The audit handbook. Improving health care through audit. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001; 39: II2–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, Grilli R, Oxman AD, Ramsay C, et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12: 298–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, Audibert F, Tourigny C, Fraser WD, et al. Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1234–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroli, G, Mignini, L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;2.
   Google Scholar
• Liljestrand, J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GML. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor (Review). Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;3.
   Google Scholar
• Nardin, JM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Smaill, F, Hofmeyr, GJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;3.
   Google Scholar
• Cecatti, JG. Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Prendiville, WJ, Elbourne, D, McDonald, S. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;4.
   Google Scholar
• Abalos, E. Active management of the third stage of labour: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, A, Ness, A, Tolosa, J. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;4.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to post term delivery: a national register-based study, 1978–1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 222–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulmezoglu, AM, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;4.
   Google Scholar
• Cuervo, LG. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett, ED, Gates, S, Hofmeyr, GJ, Sakala, C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, A. Continuous support for women during childbirth: RHL commentary (revised edn). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bruggemann OM, Parpinelli MA, Osis MJ, Cecatti JG, Neto AS. Support to woman by a companion of her choice during childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2007; 4: 5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor GM. An audit of the implementation of guidelines to reduce wound infection following caesarean section. Health Bull (Edinb) 2000; 58: 38–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). ACOG Committee Opinion #295: pain relief during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young P, Hamilton R, Hodgett S, Moss M, Rigby C, Jones P, et al. Reducing risk by improving standards of intrapartum fetal care. J R Soc Med. 2001; 94: 226–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousa HA, Mahmood TA. Do practice guidelines guide practice? A prospective audit of induction of labor three years experience. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 1086–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar