References
- SBU (1999) Routine ultrasound examination during pregnancy. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). 1998. SBU-report nr 139. Available online at: www.sbu.se/upload/Publikationer/Content0/1/ultrasound_1998/ultrasumslut.html, , accessed. September, 3
- The Health and Medical Services Act. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2004) Sweden. Swedish Code of Statutes. 1982: 763§2b. Available online at: www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108/a/23172, , accessed. May, 13
- Van den Berg M, Timmermans D, ten Kate L, Van Vugt J, Van der Wal G. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?. Genet Med. 2005; 5: 332–8
- Smith R, Titmarsh S, Overton T. Improving patients’ knowledge of the fetal scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24: 740–4
- Kohut R, Dewey D, Love E. Women's knowledge of prenatal ultrasound and informed choice. J Genet Couns. 2002; 4: 265–76
- Ladfors L, Eriksson M, Mattsson LÅ, Kylebäck K, Magnusson L, Milsom I. A population based study of Swedish women's opinions about antenatal, delivery and postpartum care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80: 130–6
- Santalathi P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Helenius H, Ryynänen M. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?. Prenat Diagn. 1998; 18: 152–65
- Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Gällstedt-Fransson I, Sjöden PO. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 9: 86–90
- Crang-Svalenius E, Dyke A-K, Jörgensen C. Organized routine ultrasound in the second trimester – one hundred women's experiences. J Matern Fetal Invest. 1996; 6: 219–22
- SBU (December, 2007) Methods of early prenatal diagnosis. A systematic review. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). 2006. SBU report nr 182. Available online at: www.sbu.se/en/Published/Yellow/1/Methods_of_Early_Prenatal_Diagnosis. accessed, dd is not stated.
- The Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics (2006) Prenatal diagnosis: the Ethics. November, 2006. Available online at: www.smer.se/Uploads/Files/44.pdf, , accessed. November, 6
- The Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics (2007) Opinion on new method for risk assessment as a decision-making in prenatal diagnosis. September, 2007. Available online at: www.smer.se/Bazment/168.aspx, , accessed. September, 24
- Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Waldenström U. Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84: 248–54
- Leithner K, Maar A, Fischer-Kern M, Hilger E, Löffler-Stastka H, Ponocny-Seliger E. Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of negative psychological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23: 240–6
- Gekas J, Gondry J, Mazur S, Cesbron P, Thepot F. Informed consent for Downs syndrome: are women given adequate information?. Prenatal Diagn. 1999; 19: 1–7
- Chin JJ. Doctor–patient relationship: from medical paternalism to enhanced autonomy. Singapore Med J. 2002; 43: 152–5
- Blaas HG, Eik-Nes S. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenatal Diagn. 2009; 29: 312–25