Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990–2006

References

• Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21: 98–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1819–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson J, McCandlish R, Kumiega L, Petrou S. Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. BJOG. 2001; 108: 149–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund I, Edman G, Ryding EL, Andolf E. Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section. BJOG. 2008; 115: 324–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, SL, Belfort, MA, Hankins, GD, Meyers, JA, Houser, FM. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:526.e1–e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizan JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006; 33: 270–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Roosmalen J, van der Does CD. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants. Trop Geogr Med. 1995; 47: 19–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2008; 35: 293–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M. Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth. 2007; 34: 32–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JM, Baston HA. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study. Birth. 2007; 34: 6–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 92: 181–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béhague D, Victoria CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making; patient choice, or social inequality? A population based cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ. 2002; 324: 942–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann S, Bordahl PE, Rasmussen SA, Irgens LM. Norwegian midwives and doctors have increased cesarean section rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 1087–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finsen V, Storeheier AH, Aasland OG. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do – not as obstetricians say. Birth. 2008; 35: 117–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou YJ, Huang N, Lin IF, Deng CY, Tsai YW, Chen LS, et al. Do physicians and their relatives have a decreased rate of cesarean section? A 4-year population-based study in Taiwan. Birth. 2006; 33: 195–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary M, Wilshin J, Persaud M, Hindmarsh PC, Rodeck CH. Do doctors have an increased rate of Caesarean section?. Lancet. 1998; 351: 1177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monari F, Di Mario S, Facchinetti F, Basevi V. Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes toward cesarean section. Birth. 2008; 35: 129–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STAKES. Synnyttäjät, synnytykset ja vastasyntyneet 2006. Föderskor, förlossningar och nyfödda 2006. Parturients, births and newborn infants 2006. Statistical summary 21/2007. HelsinkiFinland: STAKES, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gissler M, Teperi J, Hemminki E, Meriläinen J. Data quality after restructuring a nationwide medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1995; 23: 75–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gissler M, Meriläinen J, Vuori E, Hemminki E. Register-based monitoring shows decreasing socioeconomic differences in Finnish Perinatal Health. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2003; 57: 433–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin M, Hemminki E, Mäntyranta T, Stephenson P, Tiba J, Zupan J, et al. Careprovider and obstetrical interventions – a comparative study of four European countries. Scand J Caring Sci 1993; 7: 161–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemminki E, Kojo-Austin H, Malin M, Koponen P. Variation in obstetric interventions by midwife. Scand J Caring Sci 1992; 6: 81–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar