A resin-modified glass ionomer cement barrier for treating degree II furcation defects: A pilot study in dogs

References

• Bogle G, Garrett S, Stoller NH. Periodontal regeneration in naturally occurring class II furcation defects in beagle dogs after GTR with bioabsorbable barriers. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 536–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cirelli JA, Marcantonio E, Jr, Marcantonio RAC. Evaluation of anionic collagen membranes in the treatment of class II furcation lesions: an histometric analysis in dogs. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1227–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kon S, Ruben MP, Bloom AA. Regeneration of periodontal ligament using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: clinical, histological and histometric study in dogs. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1991; 11: 58–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araújo MG, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. GTR treatment of degree III furcation defects with two different resorbable barriers. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 253–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caffesse RG, Nasjetli CE, Morrison EC. Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 583–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lekovic V, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB. Histologic evaluation of guided tissue regeneration using 4 barriers membranes: a comparative furcation study in dogs. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 54–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eickholz P, Kim TS, Holle R. Regenerative periodontal surgery with non-resorbable and biodegradable barriers: results after 24 months. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 666–76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett S, Polson AM, Stoller NH. Comparison of a bioabsorbable GTR barrier to a non-absorbable barrier in treating human class II furcation defects. A multicenter parallel design randomized single-blind trial. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 667–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugoson A, Ravald N, Fornell J. Treatment of class II furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and non-resorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multi-center study. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 624–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pontoriero R, Lindhe J, Nyman S. Guided tissue regeneration in degree II furcation-involved mandibular molars. A clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 247–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jepsen S, Ebechard J, Herrera D, Needleman I. A systematic review of guided tissue regeneration for periodontal furcation defects. What is the effect of guided tissue regeneration compared with surgical debridement in the treatment of furcation defects?. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 103–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney JM, Nilvéus RE, McMillan PJ. Periodontal repair in dogs: ePTFE barrier membranes support wound stabilization and enhance bone regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 883–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigurdsson TJ, Hardwick R, Bogle GC. Periodontal repair in dogs: space provision by reinforced ePTFE membranes enhances bone and cementum regeneration in large supraalveolar defects. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 350–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeSanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of barrier material and periodontal regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 1039–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowzari H, Matian F, Slots J. Periodontal pathogens on ePTFE membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 469–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Durwin A. Regenerative surgery of intrabony periodontal defects using ePTFE barrier membranes: scanning electron microscopy evaluation of retrieved membranes versus clinical healing. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 974–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dragoo MR. Resin ionomer and hybrid ionomer cements. Part II: Human clinical and histologic wound healing responses in specific periodontal lesions. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1997; 17: 75–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu HK. Topographical characteristics of root trunk length related to guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 215–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morse A. Formic acid-sodium citrate decalcification and ethyl alcohol dehydration of tooth and bone for sectioning in paraffin. J Dent Res 1945; 24: 143–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polson AM, Southard GL, Dunn RL. Periodontal healing after guided tissue regeneration with atrisorb barriers in beagle dogs. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995; 15: 575–89
   Google Scholar
• Gottlow J, Laurell L, Lundgren D. Periodontal tissue response to a new bioresorbable guided tissue regeneration device: a longitudinal study in monkeys. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994; 14: 437–49
   Google Scholar
• Abitbol T, Santi E, Scherer W. Using a resin-ionomer in guided tissue regenerative procedures: technique and application – case reports. Periodontal Clin Invest 1996; 18: 17–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyman S, Gottlow J, Lindhe J. The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey. J Clin Periodontol 1982; 9: 257–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar