Dental and oral radiographic findings in first-year university students in 1982 and 2002 in Helsinki, Finland

References

• Marthaler TM. Changes in dental caries 1953–2003. Caries Res 2004; 38: 173–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriläinen T Occurrence, polarisation and progression rate of dental decay [Thesis]. Turku: University of Turku; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Zero DT. Sugar – the arch criminal?. Caries Res 2004; 38: 277–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtola L, Rytömaa I The condition and need for treatment in the dentition of first year university students Sosiaalivakuutus 1976;3:77–80. In Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Milen A, Pajukoski H, Luoma H. Dental caries among first-year university students of Kuopio in 1980. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1982; 78: 123–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ylipaavalniemi P, Turtola L, Murtomaa H, Rytömaa I. Evaluation of the need for third molar removals among 20 to 21-year-old Finnish university students. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1985; 8: 222–5
   Google Scholar
• Peltola JS. A panoramatomographic study of the teeth and jaws of Finnish university students. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 36–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen L, Rytömaa I. Increment of dental caries among Finnish students during a period of 2 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1977; 5: 140–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maatouk F, El-May W, Ghedira H, Fathallah N. Profile of first year dental students in Tunisia. East Mediterr Health 2001; 7: 52–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almas K, AL-Hawish A, AL-Khamis W. Oral hygiene practices, smoking habits and self-perceived oral malodour among dental students. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4: 77–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stypulkowska J, Lyszczarz R, Wichlinski J, Pawlowska K, Solska-Kuczerek A. Oral health state in dentistry students of Medical College, Jagellonian University in Cracow. Przelg Lek 2003; 60 Suppl 6: 122–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gröndahl HG, Molin L. Roentgenographic comparison of state of teeth in dental students in 1948 and 1968. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 1970; 63: 919–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattsson OA. Magnifying viewer for photofluorographic films. Acta Radiol 1953; 39: 412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltola JS, Wolf J, Männik A, Russak S, Seedre T, Sirkel M, et al. Radiographic findings in the teeth and jaws of 14- to 17-year-old Estonian schoolchildren in Tartu and Tallinn. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 31–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läärä M Polarization of caries and the explanatory background factors in a Finnish conscript population [Thesis]. Turku: University of Turku; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Beltran-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis – United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005; 26: 1–43
   Google Scholar
• Bratthall D, Petersson G. Cariogram – a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 256–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlburt CE, Wuechmann AH. Comparison of interproximal carious lesion detection in panoramic and standard intraoral radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 1154–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chauncey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ. Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 330–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlqvist M, Halling A, Hollender L. Rotational panoramic radiography in epidemiological studies of dental health. Comparison between panoramic radiographs and intraoral full mouth survey. Swed Dent J 1986; 10: 73–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molander B, Ahlqvist M, Grondahl HG, Hollender L. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 28–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfe WC, Langlais RP, Nummikoski P, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Deahl ST, et al. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 195–207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flint DJ, Paunovich E, Moore WS, Wofford DT, Hermesch CB. A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 731–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas MF, Ricketts DN, Wilson RF. Occlusal caries diagnosis in molar teeth from bitewing and panoramic radiographs. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 63–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clifton TL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 193–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen BF. Clinical and roentgenologic caries detection. A comparison. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980; 9: 34–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Åkesson L, Håkansson H, Rohlin M. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 326–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainamo J, Tammisalo E. The orthopantomograph in quantitative assessment of marginal bone loss. Suom Hammaslääk Toim 1967; 63: 132–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohlin M, Kullendorff B, Ahlqvist M, Henrikson CO, Hollender L, Stenström B. Comparison between panoramic and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1989; 18: 151–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virtanen J. Changes and trends in attack distribution and progression of dental caries in three age cohorts in Finland. J Epidemiol Biostat 2001; 6: 325–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopcraft M, Morgan M. Dental caries experience in a young adult military population. Aust Dent J. 2003; 48: 125–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macek MD, Heller KE, Selwitz RH, Manz MC. Is 75 percent of dental caries found in 25 percent of the population?. J Public Health Dent 2004; 64: 20–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XF, Xu XB, Cheng RB, Pan L. Study of caries polarization in 2–5 year old children of Shenyang, China. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2005; 23: 258–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antunes JL, Jahn GM, de Camargo MA. Increasing inequalities in the distribution of dental caries in the Brazilian contex in Finland. Community Dent Health 2005; 22: 94–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardoso L, Rosing C, Kramer P, da Costa CC, da Costa Filho LC. Polarization of dental caries in a city without fluoridated water. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 18: 237–43
   Google Scholar
• Ridell K, Sundin B, Matsson L. Endodontic treatment during childhood and adolescence. A survey of 19-year-olds living in the city of Malmö, Sweden. Swed Dent J 2003; 27: 83–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkane T, Larmas MA, Virtanen JI, Arjas E. Applying modern survival analysis methods to longitudinal dental caries studies. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 144–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von der Fehr FR. Caries prevalence in the Nordic countries. Int Dent J 1994; 44 Suppl 1: 371–8
   Google Scholar
• Bratthall D, Hansel-Petersson G, Sundberg H. Reasons for the caries decline: what do the experts believe?. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 416–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar