Subjective reactions to intervention with artificial interferences in subjects with and without a history of temporomandibular disorders

References

• Greene CS, Marbach JJ. Epidemiologic studies of mandibular dysfunction: a critical review. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 184–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark GT. Etiologic theory and prevention of temporomandibular disorders. Adv Dent Res 1991; 5: 60–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stohler CS. Clinical decision-making in occlusion: a paradigm shift. Science and practice of occlusion, C McNeill. Quintessence, Chicago 1997; 294–306
   Google Scholar
• Dawson PE. Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems2nd edn. Mosby, Louis 1998; 434–56
   Google Scholar
• Ash MM, Ramfjord SP. Occlusion4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia 1995
   Google Scholar
• Kirveskari P, Jämsä T, Alanen P. Occlusal adjustment and the incidence of demand for temporomandibular disorder treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 433–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Clark GT. An evidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boever JA, Carlsson GE, Klineberg IJ. Need for occlusal therapy and prosthodontic treatment in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Part I. Occlusal interferences and occlusal adjustment. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 367–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark GT, Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Watanabe T. Sixty-eight years of experimental occlusal inteference studies: what have we learned?. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 704–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanen P, Kirveskari P. Disorders in TMJ research. J Craniomandib Disord 1990; 4: 223–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alanen P, Varrela J. The occlusal theory further complicated. Med Hypothesis 1997; 49: 397–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharer P, Stallard RE, Zander HA. Occlusal interferences and mastication: an electromyographic study. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 438–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Boever J. Experimental occlusal balancing contact interference and muscle activity: an electromyographic study with permanently applied electrodes. Parodontologie 1969; 23: 59–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randow K, Carlsson K, Edlund J, Oberg T. The effect of an occlusal interference on the masticatory system: an experimental investigation. Odont Revy 1976; 27: 245–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakke M, Möller E. Distortion of maximal elevator activity by unilateral premature tooth contact. Scand J Dent Res 1980; 88: 67–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannam AG, Wood WW, DeCon RE, Scott JD. The effects of working-side occlusal interferences on muscle activity and associated jaw movements in man. Arch Oral Biol 1981; 26: 387–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riise C, Sheikholeslam A. The influence of experimental interfering occlusal contacts on the postural activity of the anterior temporal and masseter muscles in young adults. J Oral Rehabil 1982; 9: 419–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugh JD, Barghi N, Drago C. Experimental occlusal discrepancies and nocturnal bruxism. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 548–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson T, Enbom L. Signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction after introduction of experimental balancing-side interferences. Acta Odontol Scand 1984; 42: 129–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau YY, Ash MM. Immediate and delayed effects of working interferences on EMG and jaw movements. Electromyography of jaw reflexes in man, D Van Steenberghe, A Le Laat. Leuwen University Press, Leuwen 1989; 311–26
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson S, Cho SA, Carlsson GE. Changes in mandibular masticatory movements after insertion of non-working-side interference. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992; 6: 177–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Nakajima K, Shiga H. Velocity components of chewing movements before and after experimental occlusal interference. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1044
   Google Scholar
• Shiau YY, Suy JZ. Effect of working side interferences on mandibular movement in bruxers and non-bruxers. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 145–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen LV, Rassouli N. Experimental occlusal interferences. Part II: Masseteric EMG responses to an intercuspal interference. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 521–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba K, Ai M, Mizutani H, Enosawa S. Influence of experimental occlusal discrepancy on masticatory muscle activity during clenching. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 55–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bell Y, Jämsä T, Korri S, Niemi PM, Alanen P. Effect of artificial occlusal interferences depends on previous experience of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 219–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckinghan B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillpips ME. An evaluation of length and endphrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain 1983; 21: 177–82
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale Pain 1983; 16: 57
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson T, List T, Helkimo M. Self-assessment of pain and discomfort in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a comparison of five different scales with respect to their precision and sensitivity as well as their capacity to register memory of pain and discomfort. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 549–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of evidence based medicine to occlusal treatment for temporomandibular disorders: Are there lessons to be learned?. J Orofac Pain 2004; 18: 9–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar