A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent

References

• Mörmann W, Brandestini M. Die Cerec Computer Recon-struction. Inlays, Onlays und Veneers. Berlin: Quintessence Verlag; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chair-side computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20: 329–39.
   Google Scholar
• Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: a CAD/CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:703–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren G, Bergman M, Molin M, Bessing C. A clinical exami-nation of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50: 171–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992;4: 173–6.
   Google Scholar
• Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171–81.
   Google Scholar
• Brodbelt RHW, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1980;59:70–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Caughman WF. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:512–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66: 187–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993; 18:48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:43–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Dental Association. Quality evaluation for dental care. Guidelines for the assessment of clinical quality and professional performance. Los Angeles: The Association; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Borgmeijer PJ, Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HBM, Gruythuysen RJM. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with class II composite resin restora-tions. J Dent Child 1991;58:378–83.
   Google Scholar
• Silness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges. J Periodontal Res 1970;5:60–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994. p. 253.
   Google Scholar
• Creugers NH, Kayser AF, Van't Hof MA. A seven-and-a-half-year survival study of resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res 1992;71: 1822–5.
   Google Scholar
• Krejci I, Picco U, Lutz F. Dentinhaftung bei zahnfarben ad-hasiven MOD-Sofortinlays aus Komposit. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1151–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:145–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg NG, Dérand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen U. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic restora-tions: 6-year report. In: Mörmann WH, editor. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry, Cerec 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Proceedings. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996. p. 241–53.
   Google Scholar
• Walther W, Reiss B. Six year survival analysis of Cerec restora-tions in a private practice. In: Mörmann WH, editor. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry, Cerec 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Proceedings. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996. p. 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann N, Popp M, Klaiber B. Klinische und rasterelektro-nenmikrskopische Nachuntersuchung von Cerec-Inlays nach fiinf Jahren Liegedauer. Dtsch Zahnaertzl Z 1995;50:835–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:346–53.
   Google Scholar
• Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Scharer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1997;5:277–87.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijken JWV, Hoglund-Aberg C, Olofsson A-L. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6 year follow-up. J Dent 1998;26:219–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuellig R, Bryant RW. Three-year clinical evaluation of luting agents for Cerec restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:148 [abstract 1042] .
   Google Scholar