Odontologic survey of referred patients with symptoms allegedly caused by electricity or visual display units

References

• Council on Scientific Affairs. Health effects of video display terminals. JAMA 1987;257:1508–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh ML, Harvey SM, Facey RA, Mallette RR. Hazard assessment of video display units. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1991; 52:324–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergqvist U, Wahlberg J. Skin symptoms and disease during work with visual display terminals. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30: 197–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidén C, Wahlberg JE. Work with video display terminals among office employees. V. Dermatologic factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985;11:489–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lidén S, Berg M. Skin problems in users of video display terminals. Discrepancy between subjective symptoms and objective signs. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1991; 156:18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Swanbeck G, Bleeker T. Skin problems from visual display units. Provocation of skin symptoms under experimental conditions. Acta Derm Venerol 1989;69:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knave B, Bergqvist U, Wibom R. Symptom och subjektiva besvär vid `iiverkänslighet mot elektricitet'. Undersökningsrap-port 4. Solna: Arbetsmiljöinstitutet; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl J, Anneroth G, Stenman E. Description of persons with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display units-oral aspects. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl J. Psychological aspects of patients with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display units. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:304–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortendahl TW, Högstedt P, Holland RI. Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam in vitro caused by magnetic fields generated by CRT's and electrical cutting procedures. Swed Dent J 1991;15:31.
   Google Scholar
• Berg M, Arnetz BB, Eden S, Eneroth P, Kanner A. Techno-stress. A psychophysiological study of employees with VDU-associated skin complaints. J Occup Med 1992;34:698–701.
   Google Scholar
• Crook W. Chronic fatigue syndrome and the yeast connection. Jackson (TN): Professional Books; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald K. Electromagnetic fields: the jury's still out. IEEE Spectrum 1990:22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ross GH. Treatment options in multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health 1992;8:87–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rea WJ, Johnson AR, Ross GH, Butler JR, Fenyves EJ, Griffiths B, et al. Considerations for the diagnosis of chemical sensitivity. In: Multiple chemical sensitivities. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1992. p. 169–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks PJ, Daniell W, Black DW, Kipen HM, Altman LC, Simon GE, et al. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. I. Case definition, theories of pathogenesis and research needs. J Occup Med 1994;36:718–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks PJ, Daniell W, Black DW, Kipen HM, Altman LC, Simon GE, et al. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. II. Evaluation, diagnostic testing, treatment and social considerations. J Occup Med 1994;36:731–7.
   Google Scholar
• Koch G. Effect of sodium fluoride in dentifrice and mouthwash on incidence of dental caries in schoolchildren. Odontol Rev 1967;18 Suppl 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hix JO, O'Leary TJ. The relationship between dental caries, oral hygiene status and fermentable carbohydrate intake. J Perio-dontol 1976;7:398–404.
   Google Scholar
• Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J 1982;32:281–91.
   Google Scholar
• Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J 1974;67:101–21.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner K. Über eine Gruppeneinteilung der Lachengebisse far die Prothetik. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z 1955;10:1831–4.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman J, Migliorati L, Epstein L, Samaranayake LP. Laboratory diagnosis of oral candidosis. In: Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW, editors. Oral candidosis. London: Butter-worths; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson Y, Hardwick L. Individual diagnosis, prognosis and counselling for caries prevention. Caries Res 1978;12:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt G, Skare I. Microdetermination of mercury in biological samples. II. An apparatus for rapid automatic determination of mercury in digested samples. Analyst 1971; 67:223–9.
   Google Scholar
• Skare I. Microdetermination of mercury in biological samples. II. Automated determination of mercury in urine, fish and blood samples. Analyst 1972;97:148–55.
   Google Scholar
• Skerfving S, Berlin M. Nordiska expertgruppen for gränsvärdes-dokumentation 59. Oorganiskat kvicksilver. Arbete och Hälsa 20. Solna: Arbetsskyddsverket; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Agerberg G, Bergenholtz A. Craniomandibular disorders in adult populations of West Bothnia, Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:129–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreebny LM. Xerostomia (dry mouth). In: Sreebny LM, editor. The salivary system. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1987. p. 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Sreebny LM, Schwartz SS. A reference guide to drugs and dry mouth. Gerodontology 1986;5:75–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar