References
- Byrne D. Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 187–93.
- Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 146–54.
- Oviatt DL, Kidney PR. Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol 1991; 1: 48–55.
- Kaga K, Kodera K, Hirota E, Tsuzuki T. P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: a case report. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 905–7.
- Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DW, McGee TJ, Carrel TD, Sharma A, et al. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 poten-tials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 514–20.
- Okusa M, Shiraishi T, Kubo T, Nageishi Y. Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants. Otolar-yngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 610–5.
- Kubo T, Yamamoto K, Iwaki T, Matsukawa M, Doi K, Tamura M. Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121: 257–61.
- Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan J. Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–99.
- Shiroma M, Iwaki T, Kubo T, Soli S. Development of a Japanese version of the hearing in noise test. In: Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, editors. Cochlear implants update. The Hague, The Netherlands: Karger; 2001. p. 209–11.
- Muller J, Scion F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 198–206.
- van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; Suppl 166: 233–5.
- Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Parkin-son AJ, Wolaver A, et al. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 80S–9S.