Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing

References

• Kent R. Introduction. In: Kent R, editor. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Theory, measurement, and manage-ment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Com-pany; 1992. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R. Speech intelligibility and communicative com-petence in children. In: Kaiser AP, Gray DB, editors. Enhancing children's communication. Research founda-tions for intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brooks; 1993. p. 223–39.
   Google Scholar
• Subtelny MJ. Assessment of speech with implications for training. In: Bess F, editor. Childhood deafness: causa-tion, assessment and management. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1977. p. 183–94.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Evaluation of speech production of the hearing impaired: some benefits of forced-choice testing. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 185–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gould J, Lane H, Vick J, Perkell JS, Matthies ML, Zandipour M. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 453–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen R. The oral speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired talkers. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 286–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osberger MJ, Maso M, Sam LK. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley KF, Porter S. A comparison of three speech intelligibility measures of deaf students. Am Ann Deaf 1985; 130: 514–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly C, Dancer J, Bradley R. Correlation of SPINE test scores to judge's ratings of speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired children. Volta Rev 1986; 88: 145–50.
   Google Scholar
• Allen C, Nikolopoulos T, Dyar D, O'Donoghue G. Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22: 631–3.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr N. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experi-enced and inexperienced listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1983; 26: 451–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osberger MJ. Speech intelligibility in the hearing impaired: research and clinical implications. In: Kent R, editor. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Theory, measurement, and management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1992. p. 233–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kent R, Miolo G, Bloedel S. The intelligibility of children's speech: a review of evaluation procedures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1994; 3: 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J. Reliability of audiologist's ratings of the intelligibility of hearing-impaired children's speech. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 170–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samar VJ, Metz DE. Criterion validity of speech intelligibility rating-scale procedures for the hearing-impaired population. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 307–
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konst EM, Weersink-Braks H, Rietvelt T, Peters H. An intelligibility assessment of toddlers with cleft lip and palate who received and did not receive presurgical infant orthopedic treatment. J Commun Disord 2000; 33: 483–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavetti N. Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In: Kent R, editor. Intelligibility in speech disorders. Theory, measurement, and manage-ment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Com-pany; 1992. p. 11–34.
   Google Scholar
• Samar VJ, Metz DE. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech: where's the beef? J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 699–702.
   Google Scholar
• Remes K. Artikulatorisen sanakuvatestin laatiminen esikouluikäisille [unpublished Masters's thesis]. Hel-sinki: Helsingin yliopisto; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen K. Early childhood hearing impairment: speech intelligibility and late outcome [academic dis-sertation]. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis B 35. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavetti N, Metz DE, Sitler RW. Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of speech intelligibility: evidence from a study of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 24: 441–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chin SB, Finnegan KR, Chung BA. Relationships among types of speech intelligibility in pediatric users of cochlear implants. J Commun Disord 2001; 34: 187–205.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack HM, de Horne DJL, Sheater S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 1007–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad R. The deaf schoolchild. Language and cogni-tive function. London: Harper & Row; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Barkmeier J, Folkins JW. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 697–8.
   Google Scholar