Auditory function recovery following acoustic overstimulation

References

• Cruz RM, Lambert PM, Rubel EW. Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113: 1058–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cotanche DA. Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1987; 30: 181–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotanche DA. Regeneration of the tectorial membrane in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1987; 30: 197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Fernandez JM, Martinez Ibargilen A, Orbe-gozo Etxebarria E, Sanchez del Rey A, Santaolalla Montoya F. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions study of the noise-induced toughening effect in rats. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 154–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Smith CA. Structure of the chicken's inner ear. SEM and TEM study. Am J Anat 1978; 153: 251–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fermin CD, Cohen M. Developmental gradients in the embryonic chick's basilar papilla. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1984; 97: 39–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher FP. Quantitative analysis of the innervation of the chicken basilar papilla. Hear Res 1992; 61: 167–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Raphael Y. Re-innervation patterns of chick auditory sensory epithelium after acoustic overstimula-tion. Hear Res 1996; 97: 11–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryals BM, Westbrook EW. TEM analysis of neural terminals on autoradiographically identified regenerated hair cells. Hear Res 1994; 72: 81–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Rzadzinska A, Jedlinska U, Rajkowska E. Hair cell regeneration in the chick basilar papilla after exposure to wide-band noise: evidence for ganglion cell involvement. Hear Res 2000; 148: 197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Corwin JT, Cotanche DA. Development of location-specific hair cell stereocilia in denervated embryonic ears. J Comp Neurol 1989; 288: 529–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Sun W, Salvi RJ. Electrically evoked otoacous-tic emissions from the chicken ear. Hear Res 2001; 161: 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Withnell RH, Shaffer LA, Talmadge CL. Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig. Hear Res 2003; 178: 106–17.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, De Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985; 227: 194–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brix J, Manley GA. Mechanical and electromechanical properties of the stereovillar bundles of isolated and cultured hair cells of the chicken. Hear Res 1994; 76: 147–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton SJ, Rubel EW. Active and passive ADP compo-nents in mammalian and avian ears. In: Dabs P, Geisler CD, Matthews JW, Ruggero MA, Steele CR, editors. Mechanics and biophysics of hearing. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1990. p. 219–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kettembeil S, Manley GA, Siegl E. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the European starling and the chicken. Hear Res 1995; 86: 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk P, Mason MJ, Narins PM. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties. Hear Res 2002; 173: 100–8.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden EA, Saunders JC. Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neo-natal chick. Hear Res 1989; 41: 205–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliano FA, Pribitikin E, Adler HJ, Saunders JC. Growth of evoked potential amplitude in neonatal chicks exposed to intense sound. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler HJ, Kenealy JFX, Dedio RM, Saunders JC. Threshold shift, hair cell loss, and hair bundle stiffness following exposure to 120 and 125 dB pure tones in the neonatal chick. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1992; 112: 444–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler HJ, Poje CP, Saunders JC. Recovery of auditory function and structure in the chick after two intense pure tone exposures Hear Res 1993; 71: 214–24.
   Google Scholar
• Niemic AJ, Raphael Y, Moody DB. Return of auditory function following structural regeneration after acoustic trauma: behavioral measures from quail. Hear Res 1994; 75: 209–24.
   Google Scholar
• Umemoto M, Sakagami M, Ashida K, Fukazawa K, Matsunaga T, Senda T. Regeneration of adult budger-igar's hair cells following acoustic trauma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1993; 55: 325–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar