References
- Moore BCJ. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurootol 2003; 24: 243–54.
- Huang TS, Wang NM, Liu SY. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speak-ing patients. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 46–52.
- Sun JC, Skinner MW, Liu SY, Wang FNM, Huang TS, Lin T. Optimization of speech processor fitting strategies for Chinese-speaking cochlear implantees. Laryngo-scope 1998; 108: 560–8.
- Wei WI, Wong R, Hui Y, Au DICK, Wong BYK, Ho WK, et al. Chinese tonal language rehabilitation follow-ing cochlear implantation in children. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 218–21.
- Wei CH, Zeng FG, Cao KL, Wang ZZ. Rate discrimi-nation and tone recognition in Chinese cochlear implant patients. Abstracts of the 24th Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL, 4–8 February, 2001: 293.
- Ciocca V, Francis AL, Aisha R, Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2250–6.
- Lee KYS, van HasseIt CA, Chiu SN, Cheung DMC. Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 63: 137–47.
- Kent RD, Read C. Acoustic analysis of speech, 2nd edn. Albany, NY Singular; 2002.
- Duanmu S. The phonology of standard Chinese. Ox-ford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2002.
- Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB. Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000; 11: 153–8.
- Matthies ML, Svirsky M, Perkell J, Lane H. Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 936–46.
- Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 24S–35S.
- Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech produc-tion skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 36S–45S.
- Uchanski RM, Geers AE. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a compar-ison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 90S–105S.
- Xu L, Pfingst BE. Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3024–7.
- Xu L, Tsai Y, Pfingst BE. Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for co-chlear prostheses. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 247–58.