Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 124, 2004 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
80
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Nose/Sinus

Screening of Olfactory function Using the Biolfa® Olfactory Test: Investigations in Patients with Dysosmia

Pierre Bonfils From the ENT Research Laboratory and ENT Department, Faculty Necker—Enfants Malades, Université René Descartes, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, CNRS UPRESSA 7060 and Formation Associée Claude Bernard, Paris, FranceCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Patrick Faulcon From the ENT Research Laboratory and ENT Department, Faculty Necker—Enfants Malades, Université René Descartes, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, CNRS UPRESSA 7060 and Formation Associée Claude Bernard, Paris, France
&
Paul Avan Department of Biophysics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Pages 1063-1071 | Received 16 Jan 2004, Accepted 26 Feb 2004, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Seiden AM, Duncan HJ, Smith DV. Office management of taste and smell disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992; 4: 817–35.
  • Jakobi H, Fikentscher R, Roseburg B. Standardized examination methods for smell and taste and their clinical value. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1979; 87: 236–9.
  • Cain WS, Gent JP, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 83–8.
  • Doty RL. Olfactory system. In: Getchell TV, Doty RL, Bartoshuk LM, Snow JB, eds. Smell, and taste in health and disease. New York: Raven Press; 1991. p. 175–203.
  • Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. "Sniffin' sticks": olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimi-nation and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 1997; 22: 39–52.
  • Wolfensberger M, Schnieper I, Welge-Lussen A. Sniffin' sticks: a new olfactory test battery. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 303–6.
  • Engen T. The acquisition of odor hedonics. In: van Toller S, Dodd GH, eds. Perfumery: the psychology and biology of fragrance. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1988. p. 79–90.
  • Lehrner JP, Gluck J, Laska M. Odor identification, consistency of label use, olfactory threshold and their relationships to odor memory over the human lifespan. Chem Senses 1999; 24: 337–46.
  • Alaoui-Ismaili O, Vernet-Maury E, Dittmar A, Del-homme G, Chanel J. Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters. Chem Senses 1997; 22: 237–48.
  • Rozin P, Vollmecke TA. Food likes and dislikes. Ann Rev Nutr 1986; 6: 433–56.
  • Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ. The National Geographic smell survey results. Natl Geogr Mag 1987; 172: 14–25.
  • Nordin S, Bramerson A, Murphy C, Bende M. A Scandinavian adaptation of the Multi-Clinic Smell and Taste questionnaire: evaluation of questions about olfaction. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 536–42.
  • Nordin S, Nyroos M, Maunuksela E, Niskanen T, Tuorila H. Applicability of the Scandinavian Odor Identification Test: a Finnish-Swedish comparison. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; 122: 294–7.
  • Nordin S, Bramerson A, Liden E, Bende M. The Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test: development, reliability, validity and normative data. Acta Otolaryn-gol (Stockh) 1998; 118: 226–34.
  • French Association for Normali7ation. Sensory analysis: methodology. NF V09006. Paris: AFNOR Publications; 1989.
  • Blackwell HR. Psychophysical thresholds: experimental studies of methods of measurement. In: Bulletin of the Engineering Research Institute Ann Arbor, MI: Uni-versity of Michigan Press; 1953. p. 36.
  • Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1980.
  • Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P. A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 1995; 20: 645–56.
  • Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav 1978; 20: 175–85.
  • Wetherill GB, Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1965; 18: 1–9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.