Optimizing the efficiency of ECAP measurements due to interpolation

References

• Holden LK, Brenner C, Reeder RM, et al. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice low, medium, and high. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013;14(5):276–286. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe U, Hocke T, Hast A, et al. Cochlear implantation in candidates with moderate-to-severe hearing loss and poor speech perception. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(3):E940–E945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, et al. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):75S–79S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031542e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey M, Wesarg T, Mewes A, et al. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode. Cochlear Implants Int. 2019;20(2):80–90. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1544684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe U, Hocke T, Hast A, et al. Das maximale einsilberverstehen als prädiktor für das sprachverstehen mit cochleaimplantat. HNO. 2019;67(3):199–206. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0605-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heald SLM, Nusbaum HC. Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Colesa DJ, Buswinka CJ, et al. Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs. Hear Res. 2019;383:107809. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyle K, Brown CJ. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear. 2002;23(1 Suppl):72S–79S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, van Dijk JE. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol. 2002;7(6):335–347. doi: 10.1159/000066154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedley K, Psarros C, Gardner-Berry K, et al. Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elderly cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(5):254–262. doi: 10.1080/14992020601014979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller A, Hocke T, Mir-Salim P. Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case? Int J Audiol. 2015;54(4):257–264. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.969410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;88(3):1385–1391. doi: 10.1121/1.399716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Teagle HFB, Buchman CA. The electrically evoked compound action potential: from laboratory to clinic. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:339. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M. AutoNRTTM: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the nucleus® FreedomTM cochlear implant via machine intelligence. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40(1):15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock L, Cooper H, van de Heyning P, et al. Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates – a multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2003;4(4):161–170. doi: 10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10(2):105–116. doi: 10.1159/000083366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile J, Neben N, Dillier N, et al. Comparisons of electrophysiological and psychophysical fitting methods for cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2023;62(2):118–128. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2015543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros A, Psarros C. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: i. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting. Ear Hear. 2010;31(3):367–379. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fd86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros A, Psarros C. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness. Ear Hear. 2010;31(3):380–391. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cb41aa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros A, Banna R, Maruthurkkara S. The next generation of nucleus ® fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(7):485–494. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.781277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer R-D, et al. Clinical results of AutoNRTTM a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007;28(4):558–570. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochlear Ltd. Custom Sound EP software Version 6.0 User Guide. 94 – D1643909 V2 2020-10. D1643909 ed. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hey M, Müller-Deile J. Accuracy of measurement in electrically evoked compound action potentials. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;239:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videhult Pierre P, Eklöf M, Smeds H, et al. Cochlear implantation with the CI512 and CI532 precurved electrode arrays: one-Year speech recognition and intraoperative thresholds of electrically evoked compound action potentials. Audiol Neurotol. 2019;24(6):299–308. doi: 10.1159/000504592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venail F, Mura T, Akkari M, et al. Modeling of auditory neuron response thresholds with cochlear implants. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:394687–394610. doi: 10.1155/2015/394687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam A, Eldegwi A. Efficacy of using NRT thresholds in cochlear implants fitting, in prelingual pediatric patients. J Otol. 2019;14(4):128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2019.06.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mewes A. Verhältnis von elektrophysiologischen Kenndaten zur räumlichen intracochleären Elektrodenposition von Cochlea-Implantaten. Technische Universität Kaiserslautern; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• van Wermeskerken GKA, van Olphen AF, Graamans K. Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(10):1527–1531. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0939-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, et al. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear. 2002;23(1 Suppl):28S–40S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewes A, Brademann G, Hey M. Comparison of perimodiolar electrodes: imaging and electrophysiological outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(7):e934–e944. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki J ̵. Dimensions of the human vestibular and tympanic scalae. Hear Res. 1999;135(1-2):39–46. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00088-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel MM, Abbasalipour P, Salloum CAM, et al. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness. Ear Hear. 2014;35(6):e291–e301. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby B, Brown C, Abbas P, et al. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2012;33(3):389–398. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318239adb8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorpecci A, D'Elia A, Malerba P, et al. Maps created using a new objective procedure (C-NRT) correlate with behavioral, loudness-balanced maps: a study in adult cochlear implant users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(12):4167–4173. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4115-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant K, Law M-A, Whitford L, et al. Evaluation of streamlined programming procedures for the nucleus cochlear implant with the contour electrode array. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):651–668. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000188201.86799.01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar