Latent structure of depression in a Japanese population sample: taxometric procedures

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Widiger TA, Samuel DB. Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-fifth edition. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 494–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rounsaville BF, Alarcón RD, Andrews G, Jackson JS, Kendell RS, Kendler K. Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. A research agenda for DSM-V, DJ Kupfer, MB First, DA Regier. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 2002; 1–30
   Google Scholar
• Widiger TA, Clark LA. Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 946–963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flett GL, Vredenburg K, Krames L. The continuity of depression in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychol Bull 1997; 121: 395–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl PE, Yonce LJ. Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychol Rep 1994; 74: 1059–1274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J, Haslam N, Ruscio AM. Introduction to the taxometric method: a practical guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2006
   Google Scholar
• Waller NG, Meehl PE. Multivariate taxometric procedures: distinguishing types from continua. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Haslam N, Kim HC. Categories and continua: a review of taxometric research. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 2002; 128: 271–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haslam N. The latent structure of mental disorders: a taxometric update on the categorical vs dimensional debate. Curr Psychiatry Rev 2007; 3: 172–177
   Google Scholar
• Whisman MA, Pinto A. Hopelessness depression in depressed inpatient adolescents. Cognit Ther Res 1997; 21: 345–358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam N, Beck AT. Subtyping major depression: a taxometric analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 1994; 103: 686–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini PJ, Bennett DS, Cleland CM, Haslam N. Taxonicity of adolescent melancholia: a categorical or dimensional construct?. J Psychiatr Res 2002; 36: 247–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin G, Shean GD. A taxometric study of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 2006; 132: 101–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach SRH, Amir N. Is depression taxonic, dimensional, or both?. J Abnorm Psychol 2003; 112: 228–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio AM, Ruscio J. The latent structure of analogue depression: should the Beck Depression Inventory be used to classify groups?. Psychol Assess 2002; 14: 135–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura Y, Sakamoto S, Tomoda A, Kijima N. Latent structure of self-reported depression in undergraduates: using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. Pers Individ Differ 2009; 46: 166–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin CL, Strong DR, Greene RL. A taxometric analysis of the MMPI-2 depression scales. J Pers Assess 2002; 79: 110–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J, Ruscio AM. Informing the continuity controversy: a taxometric analysis of depression. J Abnorm Psychol 2000; 109: 473–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J, Zimmerman M, McGlinchey JB, Chelminski I, Young D. Diagnosing major depressive disorder: XI. a taxometric investigation of the structure underlying DSM-IV symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007; 195: 10–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade T. Taxometric investigation of depression: evidence of consistent latent structure across clinical and community samples. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007; 41: 403–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prisciandaro JJ, Roberts JE. A taxometric investigation of unipolar depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 718–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade T, Andrews G. Latent structure of depression in a community sample: a taxometric analysis. Psychol Med 2005; 35: 489–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankin BL, Fraley RC, Lahey BB, Waldman ID. Is depression best viewed as a continuum or discrete category? A taxometric analysis of childhood and adolescent depression in a population-based sample. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 96–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon A, Ruscio J, Seeley JR, Lewinsohn PM. A taxometric investigation of unipolar depression in a large community sample. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 973–985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J, Ruscio AM, Meron M. Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivariate Behav Res 2007; 42: 349–386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler RC. Epidemiological perspectives for the development of future diagnostic systems. Psychopathology 2002; 35: 158–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove WM. Validity of taxometric inferences based on cluster analysis stopping rules. Thinking clearly about psychology: essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, D Cicchetti, WM Grove. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN 1991; 2: 313–329
   Google Scholar
• Statistics and Information Department, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Trend survey of health and welfare: physical and mental well-being (in Japanese). Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Shima S, Shikano T, Kitamura T, Asai M. New self-rating scales for depression (in Japanese). Clin Psychiatry 1985; 27: 717–723
   Google Scholar
• Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JK, Weissman MM. Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137: 1081–1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J. Taxometric programs for the R computing environment: user's manual. Ewing: College of New Jersey, 2008. [cited 15 June 2008.] Available from http://www.taxometricmethod.com/TaxProgManual%202008-06-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan TJ, Fifield J, Reisine S, Tennen H. The measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. J Pers Assess 1995; 64: 507–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl PE. Bootstraps taxometrics: solving the classification problem in psychopathology. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 266–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura Y, Kameyama A, Katsuya N, Sakamoto S. A review of methods in depression research in Japan from 1990 to 2006 (in Japanese). Jpn J Pers 2008; 16: 238–246
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Measure 1983; 7: 249–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Zhang SB, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 19–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscio J, Ruscio AM. Clarifying boundary issues in psychopathology: the role of taxometrics in a comprehensive program of structural research. J Abnorm Psychol 2004; 113: 24–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell SE, Delaney HD. Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychol Bull 1993; 113: 181–190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl PE, Yonce LJ. Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychol Rep 1996; 78: 1091–1227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar