Radical Incrementalism and the Queer Institution in Campus Climate Studies

References

• Ali, R. (2011, April). Dear Colleague Letter. United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. American Council on Education and Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., & Garvey, J. C. (2022). Theories, findings, and implications from higher education research on student success. In N. A. Bowman (Ed.), How college students succeed: Making meaning across disciplinary perspectives (pp. 28–50). Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clowes Huneke, S. (2022, July). Toward a queer theory of the state. https://thepointmag.com/author/shuneke/
   Google Scholar
• Deasy, C., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2017). Challenging performativity in higher education: Promoting a healthier learning culture. In S. Renes (Ed.), Global voices in higher education. (pp. 59–77).
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. (1994). Queering the state. Social Text, 39(39), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/466361
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, J. C. (2020a). Exploring the role of emotions in assessing queer and trans collegians. In H. K. Ro & E. M. Broido (Eds.), Voices from the margins: Conducting inclusive assessment for minoritized students in higher education. New Directions for Student Services No. 169 (pp. 75–85). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20346
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, J. C. (2020b). Critical imperatives for studying queer and trans undergraduate student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(4), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119895511
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, J. C., & Dolan, C. V. (2021). Queer and trans student success: A comprehensive review and call to action. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 36, pp. 1–56). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, J. C., & Huynh, J. (2023). Quantitative criticalism in education research. Critical Education (accepted).
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Mason, D. (2015). Radical incrementalism. Evaluation, 21(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015578895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., & Fellabaum, J. (2008). Analyzing campus climate studies: Seeking to define and understand. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P. (2004). Research as a form of work: Expertise, community and methodological objectivity. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.R. 2471 – 117th Congress (2021-2022): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022. (2022, March 15). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2471/text
   Google Scholar
• Hursh, D., & Wall, A. F. (2011). Repoliticizing higher education assessment within neoliberal globalization. Policy Futures in Education, 9(5), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.5.560
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Keller, C., & Raza, Z. (2022). 2021 AIR National Survey of IR Offices: IR Office Staff Roles [Report]. Association for Institutional Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2023). Provocation 2: Addressing higher education’s immunity to change. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 55(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2023.2151303
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. H., Woofter, R., Haardörfer, R., Windle, M., Sales, J. M., & Yount, K. M. (2019). Measuring campus sexual assault and culture: A systematic review of campus climate surveys. Psychology of Violence, 9(6), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nureev, R., Volchik, V., & Strielkowski, W. (2020). Neoliberal reforms in higher education and the import of institutions. Social Sciences, 9(5), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050079
   Google Scholar
• Preston, M. J., & Hoffman, G. D. (2015). Traditionally heterogendered institutions: Discourses surrounding LGBTQ college students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2014.935550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, S. R. (2005). Campus climates for sexual minorities. New Directions for Student Services, 2005(111), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.170
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, S., & Garvey, J. C. (2015). Identifying, quantifying, and operationalizing queer spectrum and trans-spectrum students: Assessment and research in student affairs. In D. Stewart, K. A. Renn, & G. B. Brazelton (Eds.), Gender and sexual diversity in U.S. higher education: Contexts and opportunities for LGBTQ college students. New Directions for Student Services No. 152 (pp. 73–84). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20146
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, S., & Reason, R. (2008). Transformational tapestry model: A comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios-Aguilar, C. (2014). The changing context of critical quantitative inquiry. In F. K. Stage & R. S. Wells (Eds.), New scholarship in ciritical quantitative research—Part 1: Studying institutions and people in context. New Directions for Institutional Research: No. 158 (pp. 95–107). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20048
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Swartout, K. (2023, May 19). How a collaborative’s campus climate survey can help prevent sexual misconduct. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/05/19/how-collaboratives-campus-climate-survey-can-help-prevent-sexual
   Google Scholar
• Spade, D. (2011). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar