Resisting Normality through a Nonbinary Quantitative Method

References

• Aguilar-Hernández, J. M. (2020). Queering critical race pedagogy: Reflections of disrupting erasure while centering intersectionality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(6), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1747660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. K. (2018). Queer/quare theory: Worldmaking and methodologies. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 275–307). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, B. (2007). Thinking critically about the “critical”: Quantitative research as social critique. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.201
   Google Scholar
• Browne, K. (2010). Queer quantification or queer (y) ing quantification: Creating lesbian, gay, bisexual or heterosexual citizens through governmental social research 1. In Queer methods and methodologies (pp. 231–250). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burford, J. (2015). Queerying the affective politics of doctoral education: Toward complex visions of agency and affect. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(4), 776–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1051005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford, J. (2018). The trouble with doctoral aspiration now. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(6), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. F., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Bridging key research dilemmas: Quantitative research using a critical eye. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.202
   Google Scholar
• Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (Eds.). Feminist epistemologies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. S., Duarte, B. J., & Ross, J. (2023). Finding home in a hopeless place: Schools as sites of heteronormativity. Equity & Excellence in Education, 56(1–2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2158394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, A. (2011). Quantitative intersectionality: A critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2011.556519
   Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, A., & Vélez, V. (2013). Critical race quantitative intersectionality: An antiracist research paradigm that refuses to ‘‘let the numbers speak for themselves.” In M. Lynn & A. D. Dixson (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 270–285). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, A., Nava, P. E., Lara, A., & Burciaga, R. (2018). Race ethnicity and education critical race quantitative intersections: A testimonio analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, C. E. (2019). The one-in-ten: Quantitative Critical Race Theory and the education of the ‘new (white) oppressed.’ Journal of Education Policy, 34(3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1531314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diem, S., & Young, M. D. (2015). Considering critical turns in research on educational leadership and policy. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 838–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, B. J. (2021). Situating subjectivities in the macrosocial policy context: critical/queer multifocal policy research. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, B. J. (2024). Disrupting the binary: Critical mixed-methods as academic resistance. In M. D. Young & S. Diem (Eds.) Handbook of critical education research (pp. 473–488). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, B. J., & Cordova, A. J. (2023). Creating our own spaces: Disruptive approaches to educational leadership research. Journal of School Leadership, 33(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149673
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Beyond empiricism: Policy analysis as deliberative practice. In Hajer, M. & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 209–227). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: an introduction. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). The care of the self: Volume 3 of the history of sexuality. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, N. M., & Mayorga, O. J. (2018). The threat of unexamined secondary data: A critical race transformative convergent mixed methods. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, N. M., López, N., & Vélez, V. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gowlett, C. (2014). Queer (y) ing and recrafting agency: Moving away from a model of coercion versus escape. Discourse, 35(3), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowlett, C. (2015). Queer (y) ing new schooling accountabilities through my school: Using Butlerian tools to think differently about policy performativity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.793926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grzanka, P. R. (2016). Queer survey research and the ontological dimensions of heterosexism. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44(3–4), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2016.0039
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity”? In Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (Eds.). Feminist epistemologies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1S), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Jr, Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, D., & Brown, E. (2020). Diversity dissonance as an implication of one school’s relocation and reintegration initiative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(3), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19868511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzie, J. (2007). Women’s paths in science: A critical feminist analysis. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.206
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2014). Politics, policies and pedagogies in education: The selected works of Bob Lingard. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• López, N., Erwin, C., Binder, M., & Chavez, M. J. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1375185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2007). Ruminations on stuck pages: Identities, race, and Queer theories. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 4(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2007.10411653
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, C. A. (2003). Sissies, faggots, lezzies, and dykes: Gender, sexual orientation, and a new politics of education? Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 95–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manalansan, M. F. (2014). The “stuff” of archives: Mess, migration, and Queer lives. Radical History Review, 2014(120), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2703742
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, N. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. (2021). Dear science and other stories. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misawa, M. (2010). Musings on controversial intersections of positionality. The handbook of race and adult education (pp. 187–200). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, G. (2019). Queering and transing quantitative research. Re/Orienting Writing Studies: Queer Methods, Queer Projects, 2019, 54–74.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Huber, L., Vélez, V. N., & Solórzano, D. (2018). More than ‘papelitos:’ A QuantCrit counterstory to critique Latina/o degree value and occupational prestige. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W. (2007). The sources of racial-ethnic group differences in college enrollment: A critical examination. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.204
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). ‘Bodies are dangerous’: Using feminist genealogy as policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottmann, C. (2006). Queering educational leadership from the inside out. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120500389507
   Google Scholar
• Sablan, J. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining Critical Race Theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218798325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, E. P. (2007). Finding social justice in education policy: Rethinking theory and approaches in policy research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.205
   Google Scholar
• Stage, F. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.200
   Google Scholar
• Tabron, L. A. (2019). I pulled up a seat at the table: My journey engaging in critical quantitative inquiry. Research methods for social justice and equity in education (pp. 275–282). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Talburt, S., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2010). ‘After‐Queer’ tendencies in Queer research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390903447184
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teranishi, R. T. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and higher education policy: The use of critical quantitative research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.203
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography (Vol. 26). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Valdes, F. (1998). Theorizing OutCrit Theories: Coalitional Method and Comparative Jurisprudential Experience-RaceCrits, QueerCrits and LatCrits. University of Miami Law Review, 53, 1265.
   Google Scholar
• Valdes, F. (1999). Outsider scholars, legal theory & (and) outcrit perspectivity: Postsubordination vision as jurisprudential method. DePaul Law Review, 49, 831.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, K. (1991). Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.61.4.a102265jl68rju84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays (pp. 228–246). Beacon Press. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. D. (1999). Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional educational policy studies. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 677–714. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312036004677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar