Selecting a Measurement Model for the Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

REFERENCES

• Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. The second international symposium on information theory, B. N. Petrov, F. Csaki. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest 1973; 267–281
   Google Scholar
• Albanese M. A., Clarke W. R., Adams H. P., Jr., Woolson R. F. Ensuring reliability of outcome measures in multicenter clinical trials of treatments for acute ischemic stroke. The program developed for the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Stroke 1994; 25: 1746–1751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bock R., Mislevy R. J. Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement 1982; 6: 431–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon R. W., Lee N., Maljanian R. Postadmission function best predicts acute hospital outcomes after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2002; 81: 726–730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T., Adams H. P., Jr., Olinger C. P., Marler J. R., Barsan W. G., Biller J., et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research 2004; 33: 261–304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell C. D., Johnston D. C., Goldstein L. B. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: Comparison of the NIHSS and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke 2001; 32: 656–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson S. E., Reise S. P. Item response theory for psychologists, , et al. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein L. B., Bertels C., Davis J. N. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Archives of Neurology 1989; 46: 660–662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein L. B., Samsa G. P. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical Trial. Stroke 1997; 28: 307–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann A. W., Harvey R. L., McGuire J. R., Ingberman D., Lovell L., Semik P., et al. Measurement properties of the NIH Stroke Scale during acute rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 1174–1180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass R. E., Raftery A. E. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90: 773–795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieseppa I. A. Statistical model selection criteria and Bayesianism, , et al. University of Helsinki, Helsinki 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kuha J. AIC and BIC: Comparison of assumptions and performance. Sociological Methods & Research 2004; 33: 188–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S. M., Duncan P. W., Keighley J. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke: Comparison of the Orpington Prognostic Scale and the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 1998; 29: 1838–1842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin T. H., Dayton C. M. Model selection information criteria for non-nested latent class models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 1997; 22: 249–264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P., Claesson L., Havstad S., Ashwood T., Lu M. Factor analysis of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with large strokes. Archives of Neurology 2004; 61: 1677–1680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P., Lu M., Jackson C., Marler J., Kothari R., Brott T., et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Results of a factor analysis. Stroke 1999; 30: 2347–2354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P. D., Lau G. T. A critical appraisal of stroke evaluation and rating scales. Stroke 1991; 22: 1345–1352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P. D., Lu M., Levine S. R., Brott T. G., Broderick J. A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: Preliminary reliability and validity. Stroke 2001; 32: 1310–1317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden P. D., Shuaib A., Levin K., Atkinson R. P., Rajput A., Wechsler L., et al. Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in Ischemic Stroke (CLASS-I) final results. Stroke 2002; 33: 122–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters G. N. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982; 47: 149–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters G. N., Wright B. D. The partial credit model. Handbook of modern item response theory, W. J. Van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton. Springer, New York 1996; 101–121
   Google Scholar
• Millis S. R., Straube D., Iramaneerat C., Smith E. V., Jr., Lyden P. Measurement properties of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for people with right- and left-hemisphere lesions: Further analysis of the Clomethiazole for Acute Stroke Study–Ischemia (Class-I) Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007; 88: 302–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muir K. W., Weir C. J., Murray G. D., Povey C., Lees K. R. Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis. Stroke 1996; 27: 1817–1820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 1992; 16: 159–176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model. Handbook of modern item response theory, W. J. Van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton. Springer, New York 1996; 153–164
   Google Scholar
• Muraki E., Bock D. Parscale (Version 4.1), , et al. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL 2004
   Google Scholar
• Raftery A. E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 1995; 25: 111–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement 1969; 34: 100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima F. The graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory, W. J. Van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton. Springer, New York 1996; 85–100
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 1978; 6: 461–464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma K., Molenaar I. W. Introduction to nonparametric item response theory, , et al. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Smith E. V., Jr., Conrad J. M., Chang K., Piazza J. An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. Journal of Nursing Measurement 2002; 10: 189–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tirschwell D. L., Longstreth W. T., Jr., Becker K. J., Gammans R. E., Sr., Sabounjian L. A., Hamilton S., et al. Shortening the NIH Stroke Scale for use in the prehospital setting. Stroke 2002; 33: 2801–2806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright B. D. Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement 1977; 14: 97–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar