Testing the Distinctiveness of Visual Imagery and Motor Imagery in a Reach Paradigm

REFERENCES

• Bradshaw M. F., Watt S. J., Elliot K. M., Riddell P. M. The effects of pre-movement delay on the kinematics of prehension in middle childhood. Human Movement Science 2004; 23: 771–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carello C., Grosofsky A., Reichel F. D., Soloan H. Y., Turvey M. T. Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology 1989; 1: 27–54
   Google Scholar
• Coren S. The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and eardness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1993; 31: 1–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Cordova A., Lee S. Examining the effects of postural constraints on estimating reach. Journal of Motor Behavior 2007; 39(4)242–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Ammar D., Rodrigues L. Handedness effects on mentally stimulated reaching. Human Movement Science 2005a; 24(4)484–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard C., Ammar D., Rodrigues L. Perceived reach in hemispace. Brain and Cognition 2005b; 58(2)172–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentilluci M., Roy A. C., Stefanini S. Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: Are these tasks guided by a common motor representation?. Experimental Brain Research 2004; 157(4)496–506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glover S., Dixon P., Castiello U., Rushworth M. F. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research 2005; 166: 496–506
   Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Westwood D. A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004; 14: 203–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale M. A., Humphrey G. K. The objects of action and perception. Cognition 1998; 67: 181–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft H. A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Performance 1993; 23(1)199–212
   Google Scholar
• Holmes M. C., Sholl J. Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005; 31: 1069–1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson S., Corballis P., Gazzaniga M. Within grasp but out reach: Evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 36–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn S. M., Thompson W. L., Wraga M., Alpert N. M. Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms. NeuroReport 2001; 8: 2519–2525
   Google Scholar
• Mark L. S., Nemeth K., Gardner D., Dainoff M. J., Duffy M., Grandt K. Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23: 1365–1379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner A. D., Goodale M. A. The Visual Brain in Action, et al. Oxford University Press, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Milner A., Goodale M. A. Plans for action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 2004; 27: 37–40
   Google Scholar
• Neuper C., Scherer R., Pfurtscheller G. Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Cognitive Brain Research 2005; 25(3)668–677
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochat P., Wraga M. An account of the systematic error in judging what is reachable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23(1)199–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinovitch S. N. Perception of postural limits during reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior 1998; 30(4)352–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabate M., Gonzales B., Rodriquez M. Brain lateralization of motor imagery: Motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1041–1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng L., Latash M. L., Zatsiorsky V. M. Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cognitive Brain Research 2004; 20: 273–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirigu A., Duhamel J. R. Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001; 13(7)910–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solodkin A., Hlustik P., Chen E. E., Small S. L. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex 2004; 14: 1246–1255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J. A. Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 2005; 95(3)329–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear C. M., Byblow W. D., Steyvers M., Levin O., Swinnen S. P. Kinesthetic, but not visual imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Experimental Brain Research 2006; 168: 157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M., Hayashi S., Ni Z., Yahagi S., Favilla M., Kasai T. Physical practice induces excitability changes in human hand motor area during motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research 2005; 163: 132–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar