Perceived antecedents of marital satisfaction among Turkish, Turkish-Dutch, and Dutch couples

References

• AldersM, HarmsenC, HooghiemstraE. 2001. Relatievorming van allochtonen [Relationship formation in immigrant groups]. Samenleven. Nieuwe feiten over relaties en gezinnen. GarssenJ. Voorburgthe Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands. 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Arends-TóthJV, van de VijverFJR. 2004. Dimensions and domains in acculturation: Implicit theories of Turkish-Dutch. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 28: 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arends-TóthJV, van de VijverFJR. 2008. Family relationships among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology. 57: 466–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AytacIA, RankinBH. 2009. Economic crisis and marital problems in Turkey: Testing the family stress model. Journal of Marriage and Family. 71: 756–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CheungM. 2005. A cross-cultural comparison of gender factors contributing to long-term marital satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions. 4: 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• CrulM, SchneiderJ. 2009. Children of Turkish immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands: The impact of differences in vocational and academic tracking systems. Teachers College Record. 111: 1508–1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CuyversP. 2006. The Netherlands: Tolerance and traditionalism. Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. GeorgasJ. CambridgeUK: Cambridge University Press. 410–419.
   Google Scholar
• ErciB, ErginR. 2005. Women's satisfaction with their marriage in Turkey. Marriage & Family Review. 37: 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• FisilogluH. 2001. Consanguineous marriage and marital adjustment in Turkey. Family Journal. 9: 215–222.
   Google Scholar
• GeorgasJ, BerryJW, van de VijverFJR, KagitcibasiC, PoortingaYH(Eds.). 2006. Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. CambridgeUK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GudykunstWB, MatsumotoY. 1996. Cross-cultural variability of communication in personal relationships. Communication in personal relationships across cultures. GudykunstWB, Ting-ToomeyS, NishidaT. Thousand OaksCA: Sage. 19–56.
   Google Scholar
• HatfieldE, SprecherS. 1995. Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 26: 728–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HortacsuN. 1997. Family initiated and couple initiated marriages in Turkey. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs. 158: 325–342.
   Google Scholar
• HortacsuN. 1999. The first year of family- and couple-initiated marriages of a Turkish sample: A longitudinal investigation. International Journal of Psychology. 34: 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HortacsuN, OralA. 1994. Comparison of couple- and family-initiated marriages in Turkey. Journal of Social Psychology. 134: 229–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HunlerOS, GencozT. 2003. Boyun egici davranıslar ve evlilik doyumu iliskisi: Algılanan evlilik problemleri cozumunun rolu [Submissive behaviours and marital satisfaction relation: Mediator role of perceived marital problem solving]. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi. 18: 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• ImamogluE, YasakY. 1997. Dimensions of marital relationships as perceived by Turkish husbands and wives. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs. 123: 211–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KagitcibasiC, AtacaB. 2005. Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology. 54: 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KandiyotiD. 1995. Patterns of patriarchy: Notes for an analysis of male dominance in Turkish society. Women in modern Turkish society. TekeliS. LondonUK: Zed Books. 306–318.
   Google Scholar
• KlineSL, ZhangS, ManoharU, RyuS, SuzukiT, MustafaH. 2012. The role of communication and cultural concepts in expectations about marriage: Comparisons between young adults from six countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 36: 319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KluwerES, HeesinkJAM, Van de VliertE. 1996. Marital conflict about the division of household labor and paid work. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58: 958–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevineR, SatoS, HashimotoT, VermaJ. 1995. Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 26: 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LucasT, ParkhillMR, WendorfCA, ImamogluEO, WeisfeldCC, WeisfeldGE, ShenJ. 2008. Cultural and evolutionary components of marital satisfaction: A multidimensional assessment of measurement invariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 39: 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MadathilJ, BenshoffJM. 2008. Comparison of importance of marital characteristics and marital satisfaction for Asian Indians in arranged marriages and Americans in marriages of choice. Family Journal. 16: 222–230.
   Google Scholar
• MedoraNP, LarsonJH, HortacsuN, DaveP. 2002. Perceived attitudes towards romanticism: A cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian, and Turkish young adults. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 33: 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RielaS, RodriguezG, AronA, XuX, AcevedoBP. 2010. Experiences of falling in love: Similarities and differences in culture, ethnicity, gender, and speed. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 27: 473–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RusbultCE, MartzJM, AgnewCR. 1998. The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships. 5: 357–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. 2011. Population; sex, age, origin and generation. The HagueThe Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-ToomeyS, GaoG, TrubiskyP, YangZ, KimHS, LinSL. 1991. Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management. 2: 275–296.
   Google Scholar
• TriandisHC. 1995. Individualism and collectivism: New directions in social psychology. BoulderCO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den TroostA. 2005. Marriage in motion. A study on the social context and processes of marital satisfaction. LeuvenBelgium: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van TubergenF, MaasI. 2007. Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: An analysis of population data. Social Science Research. 36: 1065–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalterL. 2003. The Greenwood encyclopedia of women's issues worldwide: Europe. WestportCT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsJE, BestDL. 1990. Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury ParkCA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• WongS, GoodwinR. 2009. Exploring marital satisfaction across three cultures: A qualitative study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 26: 1011–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoutersC. . (1990). Van minnen en sterven. Informalisering van omgangsvormen rond seks en dood [About loving and dying. Informalization of ways of dealing with sexuality and death]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bert Bakker.
   Google Scholar
• XuX. 1996. The cross-country differences and similarities in conceptualizing and predicting marital quality of ever married women in urban America and China: Detroit and Chengdu. International Journal of Sociology of the Family. 26: 55–78.
   Google Scholar