150
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Age-related differences in everyday prospective memory tasks: The role of planning and personal importance

, &
Pages 1291-1302 | Received 01 Apr 2012, Accepted 01 Jan 2013, Published online: 11 Jan 2013

REFERENCES

  • Aberle, I., Rendell, P. G., Rose, N. S., McDaniel, M. A., & Kliegel, M. (2010). The age prospective memory paradox: Young adults may not give their best outside of the lab. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1444–1453.
  • Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological Science, 12, 457–461.
  • Cohen, A.-L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M.Kliegel, M. A.McDaniel & G. O.Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 367–390). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Folstein, M., Folstein, S., & Fanjiang, G. (2009). Krótka Skala Oceny Stanu Umysłowego (MMSE). Warsaw, Poland: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
  • Freeman, J. E., & Ellis, J. A. (2003). The intention-superiority effect for naturally occurring activities: The role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adults. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 215–228.
  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.
  • Goshke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. A.Brandimonte, G. O.Einstein & M. A.McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53–91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hennecke, M., & Freund, A. M. (2010). Staying on and getting back on the wagon: Age-related improvement in self-regulation during a low-calorie diet. Psychology and Aging, 25, 876–885.
  • Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Philips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39.
  • Ihle, A., Schnitzspahn, K., Rendell, P. G., Luong, C., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Age benefits in everyday prospective memory: The influence of personal task importance, use of reminders and everyday stress. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 84–101.
  • Kliegel, M., & Martin, M. (2007). Adult age differences in errand planning: The role of task familiarity and cognitive resources. Experimental Aging Research, 33, 145–161.
  • Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553–561.
  • Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Moor, C. (2007). Realizing complex delayed intentions in younger and older adults: The role of planning aids. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1735–1746.
  • Kliegel, M., Rendell, P. G., & Altgassen, M. (2008). The added value of an applied perspective in cognitive gerontology. In S. M.Hofer & D. F.Alwin (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 587–602). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 633–643.
  • Maylor, E. A. (1990). Age and prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 471–493.
  • Maylor, E. A. (1996). Does prospective memory decline with age? In M.Brandimonte, G. O.Einstein & M. A.McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maylor, E. A. (2008). Commentary: Prospective memory through the ages. In M.Kliegel, M. A.Daniel & G. O.Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 217–233). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Retrieval of performed versus to-be performed tasks: A naturalistic study of the intention-superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 83–98.
  • McFarland, G., & Glisky, E. (2012). Implementation intentions and imagery: Individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults. Memory and Cognition, 40, 62–69.
  • Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.
  • Niedźwieńska, A., & Barzykowski, K. (2012). The age prospective memory paradox within the same sample in time-based and event-based tasks. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 58–83.
  • Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., & Martin, M. (2008). Adult aging and prospective memory: The importance of ecological validity. In M.Kliegel, M. A.Daniel & G. O.Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 161–185). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Phillips, L. H., MacLeod, M., & Kliegel, M. (2005). Adult aging and cognitive planning. In G.Ward & R.Morris (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of planning (pp. 111–134). Hove, UK: Routledge.
  • Rendell, P. G., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory [Special issue]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 43–62.
  • Rendell, P. G., & Thomson, D. M. (1999). Aging and prospective memory: Differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, 256–269.
  • Reuter, T., Ziegelman, J. P., Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Schutz, B., & Aiken, L. S. (2010). Planning bridges the intention–behaviour gap: Age makes a difference and strategy use explains why. Psychology and Health, 25, 873–887.
  • Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychology, 19, 283–289.
  • Szarras, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2011). The role of rehearsals in self-generated prospective memory tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 346–353.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.