What is Heterodox Economics? Insights from Interviews with Leading Thinkers

References

• Alves, Carolina, and Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven. 2019. “Heterodox Economics as a Positive Project: Revisiting the Debate.” ESRC GPID Research Network Working Paper 19.
   Google Scholar
• Arestis, Philip, and Malcolm C. Sawyer (eds.). 2001. A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Phil. 2020. Can Heterodox Economics Make a Difference?: Conversations With Key Thinkers. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, Victoria, Gamage, Danula K., Hengel, Erin, and Liu, Xianyue. 2021. “The Gender Imbalance in UK Economics.” Royal Economics Society (RES) Silver Anniversary of Women’s Committee Report, July 2021. Available at: https://res.org.uk/committee/women-in-academic-economics-report-/
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Sebastian, and Wolfram Elsner. 2007. “European Contributions to Evolutionary Institutional Economics: The Cases of ‘Circular Cumulative Causation’ (CCC) and ‘Open System Approach’ (OSA). Some Methodological and Policy Implications.” Journal of Economic Issues 41 (2): 529–537. 10.1080/00213624.2007.11507042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Sebastian. 2020. “Ökonomie und Offenheit: Vom Systemdenken zum Ereignis-Denken.” In Ökonomie als Problem, edited by Ivo Genarro, R. Lüfter, and R. Simon. Baden-Baden: Karl Alber Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Andrew, and David A. Spencer. 2012. “The Nature of Economics and the Failings of the Mainstream: Lessons from Lionel Robbins’s Essay.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (4): 781–798. 10.1093/cje/bes018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Fernando Cardim de. 2019. “Fernando Cardim de Carvalho.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo. London: Routledge, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cedrini, Mario, and Magda Fontana. 2017. “Just Another Niche in the Wall? How Specialization is Changing the Face of Mainstream Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (2): 427–451. 10.1093/cje/bex003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari, Anusha. 2022. “The 2022 Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (CSWEP).” CSWEP Annual Reports: American Economic Association. Available at https://www.aeaweb.org/content/file?id=18008.
   Google Scholar
• Charusheela, S. 2019. “S. Charusheela.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 66–81. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, Lynne. 2021. “A Case of Confirmation Bias.” Journal of Economic Issues 55 (3): 584–589. 10.1080/00213624.2021.1940040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, Victoria. 2019. “Victoria Chick.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 232–251. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, Victoria, and Sheila Dow. 2005. “The Meaning of Open Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (3): 363–381. 10.1080/13501780500223585
   Google Scholar
• Colander, David, Richard Holt, and J. Barkley Rosser. 2004. The Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darity, William. 2019. “William Darity.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 49–65. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dequech, David. 2007. “Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 30 (2): 279–302. 10.2753/PKE0160-3477300207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dequech, David. 2019. “David Dequech.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 262–274. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dequech, David. 2021. “The Future of Heterodox Economics: An Institutional Perspective.” Journal of Economic Issues 55 (3): 578–583. 10.1080/00213624.2021.1940039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Leonhard, and Jakob Kapeller. 2012. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 46 (4): 1035–1058. 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2000. “Prospects for the Progress of Heterodox Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 157–170. 10.1080/10427710050025367
   Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2004. “Structured Pluralism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3): 275–290, 10.1080/1350178042000252965
   Google Scholar
• Dow, Sheila C. 2019. “Sheila Dow.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 17–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, William M. 1980. “Power: An Institutional Framework of Analysis.” Journal of Economic Issues 14: 897–907. 10.1080/00213624.1980.11503790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederer, Stefan, Eckhard Hein, Torsten Niechoj, Sabine Reiner, Achim Truger, and Till van Treeck. 2012. Interventions: 17 Interviews with Unconventional Economists. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, Steve 2011. “Powers and Tendencies Revisited.” Journal of Critical Realism 10 (1): 80–99. 10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, Steve. 2013. Hayek’s Political Economy: the socio-economics of order. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, Steve. 2017. “The Critical Realist Conception of Open and Closed Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (1): 41–68. 10.1080/1350178X.2016.1218532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, Edward. 2019. “Edward Fullbrook.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 252–261. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, James K. 2021. “Review of Andrew Mearman, Sebastian Berger, and Danielle Guizzo, ‘What is Heterodox Economics: Conversations with Leading Economists.’” Œconomia 11 (2): 391–393.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, Robert F. 2006. “Paradigms and Pluralism in Heterodox Economics.” Review of Political Economy 18 (4): 521–546. 10.1080/09538250600915725
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, Nicolai. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud, Yann. 2014. “Negotiating the ‘Middle-of-the-Road’ Position: Paul Samuelson, MIT, and the Politics of Textbook Writing, 1945-55.” History of Political Economy 46 (suppl. 1): 134–152. 10.1215/00182702-2716145
   Google Scholar
• Heise, Arne, and Sebastian Thieme. 2016. “The Short Rise and Long Fall of Heterodox Economics in Germany after the 1970s: Explorations in a Scientific Field of Power and Struggle.” Journal of Economic Issues 50 (4): 1105–1130. 10.1080/00213624.2016.1249752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, John. 2021. “Heterodoxy: More than Criticism.” Journal of Economic Issues 55 (3): 595–602. 10.1080/00213624.2021.1945873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heterodox Economics Directory (HED). 2016. “100 Words on Heterodox Economics.” Available at http://heterodoxnews.com/hed/#entry-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2019. Is There a Future for Heterodox Economics?: Institutions, Ideology, and a Scientific Community. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2021. “Debating the Future of Heterodox Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 55 (3): 603–614. 10.1080/00213624.2021.1945874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, William A. 2018. “Strategic Pluralism and Monism in Heterodox Economics.” Review of Radical Political Economics 50 (2): 237–251. 10.1177/0486613416670971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jullien, Dorian. 2018. “Practices of Using Interviews in History of Contemporary Economics: A Brief Survey.” Center for the History of Political Economy, CHOPE Working Paper No. 2018-02, January 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapp K. William., 1976. “Economics in the Future: The Open System Character of the Economy and its Implications.” In Economics in the Future: Towards a New Paradigm, edited by Kurt Dopfer, 90–105, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, Marc. 2020. “Heterodox Economics as Seen by Geoffrey Hodgson: An Assessment.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 17 (1): 9–18. 10.4337/ejeep.2020.01.02
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2006. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (4): 483–505. 10.1093/cje/bei093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2009. “Introduction.” In Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critics, edited by E. Fullbrook. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2013. “What is this ‘School’ Called Neoclassical Economics?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (5): 947–983. 10.1093/cje/bet027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2019. “Tony Lawson.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 130–155. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic S. 2009 A History of Heterodox Economics. Challenging the Mainstream in the 20th Century. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic S. 2012. “Heterodox Economics and its Critics.” Review of Political Economy 24 (2): 337–351. 10.1080/09538259.2012.664360
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic S., Xuan Pham, Gyun Gu. 2013. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise and the Narrowing of UK Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (4): 693–717. 10.1093/cje/bet031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederic S. 2019. Microeconomic Theory: A Heterodox Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 1994. “Isolation, Idealization and Truth in Economics.” Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 38: 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2000. “Reclaiming Relevant Realism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1): 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, Uskali. 2005. “Models are Experiments, Experiments are Models.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2): 303–315. 10.1080/13501780500086255
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2019. “Joan Martinez-Alier.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 156–172. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, Tiago. 2006. “Dissent in Economics - Making Radical Political Economics and Post Keynesian Economics, 1960–80.” Doctoral dissertation. London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mata, Tiago. 2010. “The Enemy Within: Academic Freedom in 1960s and 1970s American Social Sciences.” History of Political Economy 42: 77–104. 10.1215/00182702-2009-073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew. 2006. “Critical Realism in Economics and Open-Systems Ontology: A Critique.” Review of Social Economy 64 (1): 47–75. 10.1080/00346760500529955
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew. 2011. “Who Do Heterodox Economists Think They Are?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70 (2): 480–510. 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00774.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew. 2012. “Heterodox Economics’ and the Problems of Classification.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4): 407–424. 10.1080/1350178X.2012.742201
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew, Sebastian Berger, and Danielle Guizzo. 2019. What is Heterodox Economics?: Conversations with Leading Economists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, Andrew, Sebastian Berger, and Danielle Guizzo. 2022. “How Different is Heterodox Economists’ Thinking on Teaching? A Contrastive Evaluation of Interview Data.” Review of Political Economy 34 (1): 45–68. 10.1080/09538259.2020.1869402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip, and Dieter Plehwe. 2009. The Road from Mont Pelerin – The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik Kah. 2016. The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mongiovi, Gary. 2019. “Gary Mongiovi.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 186–206. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, Gunnar. 1932. Das Politische Element in der Nationalökonomischen Doktrinbildung. Berlin: Junker.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Julie. 2019. “Julie Nelson.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 111–129. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2019. “Beyond Growth: Towards a New Economic Approach.” General Secretariat SG/NAEC (2019) 3. Available at www.oecd.org/naec/averting-systemic-collapse/SG-NAEC%282019%293_Beyond%20Growth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potts, Jason. 2021. “How Heterodox Economics Lost its Way.” Journal of Economic Issues 55 (3): 584–589. 10.1080/00213624.2021.1940041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2015. Economics Rules: Why Economics Works, When it Fails, and How to Tell the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sent. Esther-Mirjam. 2019. “Esther-Mirjam Sent.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 173–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, Anwar. 2019. “Anwar Shaikh.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 207–231. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slade-Caffarel, Yannick. 2019. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics Revisited.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 43 (3): 527–539. 10.1093/cje/bey043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon, Brian, and Howard R. Vane (eds.). 1999. Conversations with Leading Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, Clive. 2020. “A Tale of Three Paradigms: Realizing the Revolutionary Potential of Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 169: 1–14. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steppacher, Rolf. 2019. “Rolf Steppacher.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 94–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ura, Karma. 2019. “Karma Ura.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 82–93. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo, Matias. 2014. “Conversation or Monologue? On Advising Heterodox Economists.” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 32 (3): 389–396. 10.2753/PKE0160-3477320304
   Google Scholar
• Waller, William. 2022. “A Reconsideration of William Dugger’s Analysis of Power.” Forum for Social Economics 51 (1): 95–111. 10.1080/07360932.2017.1370603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, Roy E. 2007. “History of Thought Introduction: Economists Talking with Economists, An Historian’s Perspective.” In Inside the Economist’s Mind: Conversations with Eminent Economists, edited by P. A. Samuelson and W. A. Barnett. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, Richard. 2010. “Reconfiguring the Public Sciences: The Impact of Governance Changes on Authority and Innovation in Public Sciences Systems.” In Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation, edited by Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser, and Lars Engwall, 3–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, Ulrich. 2019. “Ulrich Witt.” In What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Leading Economists, edited by A. Mearman, S. Berger, and D. Guizzo, 275–285. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, Barbara. 1938. Lament for Economics. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wrenn, Mary V. 2006. “Agency and Mental Models in Heterodox Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (2): 483–491. 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar