Can Producer Associations Improve Rural Livelihoods? Evidence from Farmer Centres in India

References

• Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (2000). Conceptualising environmental collective action: Why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(3), 283–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (2010). Rethinking agricultural production collectivities. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(9), 64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcand, J. L., & Fafchamps, M. (2011). Matching in community-based organizations. Journal of Development Economics, 98(2), 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Mhbounds-sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects (IZA Discussion Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M., Delancey, V. H., & Mellencamp, A. (1984). Bridging the gender gap in agricultural extension: International Center for Research on Women (Report prepared for the Office of Women in Development, United States Agency for International Development).
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, T., & Spielman, D. J. (2009). Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 34(1), 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of economic surveys, 22(1), 31–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, R., and Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. A. (1991). Coping with seasonality and drought: New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, R. (2000). On their own: Development strategies of the Self-Employed Womens Association (SEWA) in India. Development, 43(4), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, R. (2003). From development to empowerment: The Self-Employed Women's Association in India. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 16(3), 351–368.
   Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 271–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, G., Willett, A., & Zijp, W. (2001). Agricultural extension: Generic challenges and the ingredients for solutions. Knowledge Generation & Technical Change, 19, 313–353.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012). Linking smallholders to markets: Determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of India. (2005). Final Report of the Commission on Farmers’ Welfare. Hyderabad: Government of Andhra Pradesh.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.
   Google Scholar
• Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichino, A., Mealli, F., & Nannicini, T. (2008). From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity?. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(3), 305–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kanchi, A. (2010). Women workers in agriculture: Expanding responsibilities and shrinking opportunities (ILO Asia Pacific Working Paper Series).
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P. (2009). Women’s exclusion and unfavorable inclusion in informal employment in Lucknow, India: Barriers to voice and livelihood security. World Development, 37(1), 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E., & Mason, A. D. (2001). Engendering development: Through gender equality in rights, resources, and voice: Washington, DC: World Bank [etc.].
   Google Scholar
• Krauth, B. (2011). Bounding a linear causal effect using relative correlation restrictions (Department of Economics Discussion Paper 11-02). Vancouver: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, M. (1990). Agricultural extension in India. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and -driven development: A critical review. World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? (Policy Research Report). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. (2013) State of Indian Agriculture 2012–2013. New Delhi: Press Bureau of India.
   Google Scholar
• National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. (2011). Status of microfinance in India. Bombay: NABARD.
   Google Scholar
• National Sample Survey Organisation. 2003. National survey sample, 59th round. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4, 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Commission, Government of India. (2011). Report of working group on National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM). New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development, 38(4), 581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe, K. (2008). Reforming the agricultural extension system in India: What do we know about what works where and why? (Discussion Paper No. 775). International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (2006). Promoting sustainable producer group enterprises: A review of FAO experience (1981–2006) Lessons learned and ideas for the future. Rome: FAO. Retrieved February, 20, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, D. J., & Pandya-Lorch, R. (Eds.). (2009). Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, N., & Srivastava, R. (2010). Women, work, and employment outcomes in rural India. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(28), 49.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, K. (2006). Political economy of agrarian distress. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(16), 1523–1529.
   Google Scholar
• Unni, J., & Rani, U. (2003). Social protection for informal workers in India: Insecurities, instruments and institutional mechanisms. Development and Change, 34(1), 127–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westermann, O., Ashby, J., & Pretty, J. (2005). Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development, 33(11), 1783–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2008). World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2012). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar