Party System Competition and Private Sector Development in Africa

References

• Afrobarometer Data. 2005a. Mozambique. Round 3. (J. C. G. Pereira, D. de Rosário, S. Manuel, C. Shenga, and E. Namburete, Compiler). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data. 2005b. Zambia. Round 3. (P. Lolojih, Compiler). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data. 2008a. Mozambique. Round 4. (C. Shenga and A. Pereira, Compiler). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data. 2008b. Zambia. Round 4. (Synovate Zambia, Compiler) (formerly the Steadman Group). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data. 2012. Mozambique. Round 5. (Centre for Research on Governance and Development, Compiler). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Afrobarometer Data. 2013. Zambia. Round 5. (Ruralnet Associates, Compiler). Retrieved from http://www.afrobarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• allAfrica.com. (2012, September 24). Mozambique: Frelimo doubles its membership. ALLAFRICA.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola, L. (2012). Multiethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basedau, M. (2007). Do party systems matter for democracy? A comparative study of 28 Sub-Saharan countries? In M. Basedau, G. Erdmann, & A. Mehler (Eds.), Votes, money and violence: Political parties and elections in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 105–137). Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstituet.
   Google Scholar
• Bleck, J., & van de Walle, N. (2013). Valence issues in African elections: Navigating uncertainty and the weight of the past. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1394–1421. doi 10.1177/0010414012453448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2008). Dominant party systems and electoral volatility in Africa: A comment on Mozaffar and Scarritt. Party Politics, 14, 113–130. doi:10.1177/1354068807083825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, P. (2014). Elite Transition: From Apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa (3rd ed.). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, E. A. (2008). State failure and success in Uganda and Zimbabwe: The logic of political decay and reconstruction in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 44, 339–364. doi:10.1080/00220380701848350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brune, N., Garrett, G., & Kogut, B. (2004). The international monetary fund and the global spread of privatization. IMF Staff Papers, 51(2), 195–219.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, G. (2007). Political parties and party systems in Africa: Themes and research perspectives. World Political Science Review, 3(3), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• CIP. (2016). Base de Dados Interesses Empresariais. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from www.cip.org.mz
   Google Scholar
• CIP. (2013). Elite Política Moçambicana à “Caça” de Contratos de Prestação de Serviços na Indústria Extractiva. Serviço da Partilha Informação, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J. (2002). Privatization and indigenous ownership: Evidence from Africa. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(4), 559–576. doi:10.1111/1467-8292.00205
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ECZ. (1991). 1991 parliamentary elections-final results: Province: 02 Copperbelt. Retrieved from http://www.elections.org.zm/media/parl_copperbelt_1991.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECZ. (2001). 2001 parliamentary results. Retrieved from http://www.elections.org.zm/past_election_results.php#lightbox/0/
   Google Scholar
• ECZ. (2006). 2006 parliamentary results. Retrieved from http://www.elections.org.zm/media/parliamentary_results_2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECZ. (2015). 2015 presidential election. Retrieved from http://www.elections.org.zm/results/2015_presidential_election
   Google Scholar
• Elischer, S. (2013). Political Parties in Africa: Ethnicity and Party Formation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, F., Devereux, S., & White, P. (2009). Social Protection in Africa. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann, G. (2004). Party research: Western European bias and the ‘African labyrinth’. Democratization, 11(3), 63–87. doi:10.1080/1351034042000238176
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, K. (2010, October). The social origins of electoral volatility in Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 759–779. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2011a). Country report: Mozambique. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2011b). Country report: Zambia. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2014). Comparative and historical data. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org
   Google Scholar
• Frelimo. (2007). Departamento de mobilização e propaganda. Boletim de Célula 1, Fevereiro.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T. (2010). Building states and markets after communism: The perils of polarized democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (Eds). (2008). The politics of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (2015). Election indices [dataset]. Retrieved January 8, 2016, from http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/Docts/ElectionIndices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. (2010). The effective number of parties: A new approach. Party Politics, 16(2), 171–192. doi:10.1177/1354068809339538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, E. (2013). Orientações superiores: Time and bureaucratic authority in Mozambique. African Affairs, 112, 602–622. doi:10.1093/afraf/adt045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A. (2007). Encouraging effective democratic competition. East European Politics & Societies, 21(1), 91–110. doi:10.1177/0888325406297129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (1995). The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, A. (2008). Business and the state in Africa: Economic policy-making in the neo-liberal Era. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, J. (2001, September 17). Mozambique banking crisis. Moçambique On-line, English version of an article published in Metical 1073. Retrieved from http://www.mol.co.mz/noticias/metical/2001/en010917.html
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, A., & Kuhonta, E. (2011). Shadows from the past: Party system institutionalization in Asia. Comparative Political Studies, 44(5), 572–597. doi:10.1177/0010414010396460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, V. (1942). Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2013). Dataset of the Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project (DALP). Duke University. Retrieved from https://web.duke.edu/democracy/data.html
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K., Luna, J., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. (2010). Latin American party systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Macpherson, J. (2008). The decision to privatize: Economists and the construction of ideas and policies. In B. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 104–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramon, E., & Posner, D. (2013). Who benefits from distributive politics? How the outcome one studies affects the answer one gets. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 461–474. doi:10.1017/S1537592713001035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, M., & Lambright, G. (2001). Party system institutionalization in 30 African countries. Party Politics, 7, 437–468. doi:10.1177/1354068801007004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, M., & Lambright, G. (2005). Party systems and democratic consolidation in Africa’s electoral regimes. Party Politics, 11, 423–446. doi:10.1177/1354068805053211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBas, A. (2011). From protest to parties: Party-building and democratization in Africa. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (2002). Economic reform and the discourse of democracy in Africa: Resolving the contradictions. In M. R. Beissinger & C. Young (Eds.), Beyond state crisis? Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in comparative perspective (pp. 290–320). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. (2007). Institutionalization of party systems? Stability and fluidity among legislative parties in Africa’s democracies. Government and Opposition, 42(2), 215–241. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, N., & Riedl, R. (2013). Political parties and uncertainty in developing democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1339–1365. doi:10.1177/0010414012453445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In R. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of political parties (pp. 204–227). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. (2002). Conflict management and elite habituation in post-war democracy: The case of Mozambique. Comparative Politics, 35(1), 63–84. doi:10.2307/4146928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkandawire, T. (2015). Neopatrimonialism and the political economy of economic performance in Africa: 
Critical reflections. World Politics, 67(03), 563–612. doi:10.1017/s004388711500009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinar, J. (1991). Counting the number of parties: An alternative index. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1383–1391. doi:10.2307/1963951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mozambique. (1992–2012). Boletim da República, Série III (pp. 1992–2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mozambique. (2007, August 1). Lei do Trabalho (Lei no. 23/2007). Assembleia da República.
   Google Scholar
• Mozambique. (2009). Relatório e Contas. IGEPE. Retrieved April 27, 2014 from http://www.igepe.org.mz/docs/relatorio_contas_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mozambique. (2012). Inquérito as Indústrias Manufactureiras 2012 (IIM 2012) (Inquérito às Empresas Manufactureiras Moçambicanas 2012). Relatório Descritivo. Ministério da Planificação e Desenvolvimento. Direcção Nacional de Estudos e Analise de Politicas.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo, V. (2009). Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policymaking in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M., & Lafay, J.-D. (Eds). (1991). Economics and politics: The calculus of support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyati, K. (2015, January 30). Ensure predictability in policies-ZAACI. Zambia Daily Mail. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from https://www.daily-mail.co.zm/?p=18675
   Google Scholar
• Oshienebo, E. (2009). Regulating transnational corporations in domestic and international regimes: An African case study. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. (1980). On measuring party system change: A methodological critique and a suggestion. Comparative Political Studies, 12(4), 387–403. doi:10.1177/001041408001200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015, January 14). Partisans on both sides rate their own parties better. http://www.people-press.org/2015/01/14/obama-job-rating-ticks-higher-views-of-nations-economy-turn-more-positive/1-14-2015-parties_6/
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, M. A. (2012). Party politics and economic reform in Africa’s democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polity IV Project. (2014). Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1810-2010. Retrieved from http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
   Google Scholar
• Posner, D., & Simon, D. (2002). Economic conditions and incumbent support in Africa’s new democracies: Evidence from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies, 35(3), 313–336. doi:10.1177/0010414002035003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Private Sector Development Reform Programme, Zambia Business Forum, Finmark Trust, World Bank. (2010, June). The Zambia business survey: The profile and productivity of Zambian businesses.
   Google Scholar
• Qreshi, M., & Te Velde, D. (2007, March). State-business relations and firm performance in Zambia. Discussion paper series number five. Research programme consortium for improving institutions for pro-poor growth. University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.ippg.org.uk/papers/dp5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rakner, L. (2003). Political and economic liberalisation in Zambia 1991–2001. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, W. (2004). The privatisation of sovereignty and the survival of weak states. In B. Hibou (Ed.), Privatizing the state (pp. 95–119). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, D. (2014). Urban poverty and party populism in African democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, R. (2014). Authoritarian origins of democratic party systems in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2013, November). Market reform, programmatic (De)alignment, and party system stability in Latin America, Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1422–1452. doi:10.1177/0010414012453449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K., & Wibbels, E. (1999). Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. The American Political Science Review, 93(3), 575–590. doi:10.2307/2585575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routley, L. (2014). Developmental states in Africa? A review of ongoing debates and buzzwords. Development Policy Review, 32(2), 159–177. doi:10.1111/dpr.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustow, D. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363. doi:10.2307/421307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakulanda, G. (2013). President’s message. ZACCI Journal, 2(3), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. republished Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2004). Business politics and the state in twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America: Business, labor, and the challenges of equitable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, K., & Te Velde, D. (2009). State business relations and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 45(8), 1267–1283. doi:10.1080/00220380902863307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simutanyi, N. (2005, September). Parties in parliament: The relationship between members of parliament and their parties in Zambia. EISA Occasional Paper No. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. (Ed). (2001). Public support for market reforms in new democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, H. (2013). Changing societies, changing party systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulandssekretariatet. (2013a). Zambia-Labour market profile 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ulandssekretariatet.dk/sites/default/files/uploads/public/PDF/LMP/zambia_2013_final_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ulandssekretariatet. (2013b). Mozambique-Labour market profile 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ulandssekretariatet.dk/sites/default/files/uploads/public/PDF/LMP/mozambique_2013_final_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2014). Report on the implementation of the investment policy review-Zambia. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van de Walle, N. (2003). Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa’s emerging party systems. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(2), 297–321. doi:10.1017/S0022278X03004269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W., van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (2007). The economy and the vote: Economic conditions and elections in fifteen countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Donge, J. (2008). The plundering of Zambian resources by Frederick Chiluba and his friends: A case study of the interaction between national politics and the international drive towards good governance. African Affairs, 108, 69–90. doi:10.1093/afraf/adn073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weghorst, K., & Bernhard, M. (2014). From formlessness to structure? The institutionalization of competitive party systems in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1707–1737. doi:10.1177/0010414013516068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2013, October). Zambia’s jobs challenge: Realities on the ground. Zambia Economic Brief. Issue 2.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. (2014). An initial look into party switching in Africa: Evidence from Malawi. Party Politics, 20(1), 105–115. doi:10.1177/1354068811436041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambia’s Inconsistent Mining Taxation is Costing Us. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.lusakatimes.com/2015/09/16/zambias-inconsistent-mining-taxation-policy-is-costing-us/
   Google Scholar
• ZCTU. (2002). Zambia: Socio-economic issues and unionization. Global Policy Network: Zambia Congress of Trade Unions.
   Google Scholar
• ZCTU. (2012, May 21). Socioeconomic policies for inclusive growth, sustainable development and decent work. Presented by Leonard Hikaumba, President, ZCTU. ILO, IMF, Gov’t and Stakeholders Conference, Lusaka.
   Google Scholar
• ZPA. (2005). Status report as at 30th April, 2005. Mimeo.
   Google Scholar