How Do Legal Strategies Advance Social Accountability? Evaluating Mechanisms in Colombia

References

• Abers, R., & Keck, M. (2009). Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil’s participatory water policy. Politics & Society, 37(2), 289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abers, R., & Keck, M. (2013). Practical authority: Agency and institutional change in Brazilian water politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice.”. World Development, 32(3), 447–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. (2016). Accidental activists: Victim movements and government accountability in Japan and South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. (2019). The mechanisms behind litigation’s “radiating effects”: Historical grievances against Japan. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 6–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2008). Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), 911–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, S. (2015). Courts that matter: Judges, litigants and the politics of rights enforcement in Latin America ( Ph.D. Dissertation). Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Botero, S. (2018). Judges, litigants, and the politics of rights enforcement in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 50(2), 169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conexión Capital. (2019, May 4). El río Bogotá hoy ya es navegable.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo del Estado. (2014). Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera, acción popular. M.P. Marco Antonio Velilla.
   Google Scholar
• Contraloría de Bogotá. (2014). Evaluación del programa de saneamiento del Río Bogotá 2008–2013. Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• Corte Constitucional. (2008). Sentencia T-760 de 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Defensoría del Pueblo. (2009). La tutela y el derecho a la salud: Período 2006–2008. Bogotá: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Defensoría del Pueblo. (2015). La tutela y los derechos a la salud y a la seguridad social 2014. Bogotá: Author.
   Google Scholar
• El Espectador. (2012, November 12). La pelea por descontaminar el río Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• El Espectador. (2016, October 16). Sellan empresas que contaminan el agua en Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• El Espectador. (n.d.). El Río. Retrieved from http://blogs.elespectador.com/actualidad/el-rio
   Google Scholar
• El Heraldo. (2013, August 11). ¿Quién ve por las veedurías ciudadanas?
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (1996, January 15). Embalse del Muña asfixia a Sibaté.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2011, July 8). Marchas frente a la Corte.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2012, May 10). Corte exige a Gobierno control sobre “mercaderes de la salud.”.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2018, November 18). Por contaminar el río Bogotá, sellan 23 curtiembres.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2019a, January 4). 10 años después, tutelas en salud siguen creciendo en vez de reducirse.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2019b, March 31). Banco Mundial destaca avances de obras en el río Bogotá.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (2019c, May 17). Con drones y cámaras vigilan el río Bogotá las 24 horas.
   Google Scholar
• El Tiempo. (n.d.). El Bogotá, un río que se resiste a morir. Retrieved from https://www.eltiempo.com/multimedia/especiales/recuperacion-del-rio-bogota/14057236/1/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Epp, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falleti, T. (2016). Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes. New Political Economy, 21, 455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falleti, T., & Lynch, J. (2009). Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–4466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2007a). Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2007b). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (2017). The last mile problem: Activists, advocates, and the struggle for justice in domestic courts. Comparative Political Studies, 50(12), 1666–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauri, V., & Brinks, D. M. (2008). Introduction: The elements of legalization, and the triangular shape of social and economic rights. In V. Gauri & D. M. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 1–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Vélez, C. A., & Sánchez Gómez, H. (2005). El Consejo Nacional de Seguridad Social en Salud en Colombia: Reinstitucionalización y conflicto, 1994–2001. Bogotá: Assalud.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ocantos, E. A. (2016). Shifting legal visions: Judicial change and human rights trials in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, V. (2017). From participatory promises to partisan capture: Local democratic transitions and Mexican water politics. Comparative Politics, 49(4), 479–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbink, L. (2012). The origins of positive judicial independence. World Politics, 64(4), 587–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, F. F., & Bentes, F. R. N. M. (2008). Accountability for social and economic rights in Brazil. In V. Gauri & D. M. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 100–145). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzmeyer, C. (2009). Human rights in an era of neoliberal globalization: The Alien Tort Claims Act and grassroots mobilization in Doe v. Unocal. Law & Society Review, 43(2), 271–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. (2017). Legal empowerment and social accountability: Complementary strategies toward rights-based development in health? World Development, 99, 160–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Houtzager, P. P. (2012). Widgets or watchdogs? Conceptual explorations in social accountability. Public Management Review, 14(2), 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosack, S., & Fung, A. (2014). Does transparency improve governance? Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamprea, E. (2014). Colombia’s right-to-health litigation in a context of health care reform. In A. Gross & C. Flood (Eds.), The right to health at the public/private divide: A global comparative study (pp. 131–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprea, E. (2015). Derechos en la práctica: Jueces, litigantes, y operadores de políticas de salud en Colombia (1991–2014). Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprea, E. (2016). Daño ambiental y sentencias de reforma structural: El caso del Río Bogotá. In H. Alviar García (Ed.), Nuevas tendencias del derecho administrativo (pp. 283–306). Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, M., Rodríguez-Garavito, C., & Rossi, J. (2017). Social rights judgments and the politics of compliance: Making it stick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. (2003). Introduction: Democratic accountability in Latin America. In S. Mainwaring & C. Welna (Eds.), Democratic accountability in Latin America (pp. 3–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, L. (1998). Theorizing about trial courts: Lawyers, policymaking, and tobacco litigation. Law & Social Inquiry, 23(4), 897–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayka, L. (2019a). Building participatory institutions in Latin America: Reform coalitions and institutional change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayka, L. (2019b). Society-driven participatory institutions: Lessons from Colombia’s planning councils. Latin American Politics and Society, 61, 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, M. W. (1994). Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, D. (2003). Outsourcing regulation: Analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring. Policy Studies Journal, 31(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olvera Rivera, A. J. (2006). Social accountability in Mexico: The Civic Alliance experience. In E. Peruzzotti & C. Smulovitz (Eds.), Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 178–212). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E. (2006). Media scandals and social accountability: Assessing the role of the Senate scandal in Argentina. In E. Peruzzotti & C. Smulovitz (Eds.), Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 249–271). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (2006). Social accountability: An introduction. In Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 3–33). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Procuraduría General de la Nación. (2008). El derecho a la salud en perspectiva de derechos humanos y el sistema de inspeccion, vigilancia y control del Estado Colombiano en material de quejas en salud. Bogotá: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, accountability, and representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, J. (2019). State-driven activism: Bureaucrats and social movements in democratic Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ríos-Figueroa, J. (2016). Constitutional courts as mediators: Armed conflict, civil-military relations, and the rule of law in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2014). The judicialization of health care: Symptoms, diagnosis, and prescriptions. In R. Peerenboom (Ed.), Law and development of middle-income countries: Avoiding the middle-income trap (pp. 246–269). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Garavito, C., & Rodríguez-Franco, D. (2015). Radical deprivation on trial: The impact of judicial activism on socioeconomic rights in the global south. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, A. (2017). Litigating the right to health: Courts, politics, and justice in Indonesia ( No. 76). Honolulu: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. In L. Diamond, M. F. Plattner, & A. Schedler (Eds.), The self-restraining State: Power and accoutability in new democracies (pp. 13–28). Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2011a, July 7). Medidas para enfrentar el problema del sector salud son paliativas: Corte Constitucional.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2011b, July 8). Sector salud no pasó examen de la Corte Constitucional.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2011c, December 5). Nuevo Plan Obligatorio de Salud regirá a partir de enero.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2012a, May 7). Unificación del POS le pone fin a la discriminación en la salud, dice Santos.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2012b, July 3). Conozca los cambios en el Plan Obligatorio de Salud.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2015, February 16). Santos firma ley para garantizar acceso a servicios de salud.
   Google Scholar
• Semana. (2018, October 26). Destapan cáncer de corrupción en la Superintendencia de Salud.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S., & Mehta, P. B. (2008). Courts and socioeconomic rights in India. In V. Gauri & D. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 146–182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigal, M., Rossi, J., & Morales, D. (2017). Argentina: Implementation of collective cases. In M. Langford, C. Rodríguez-Garavito, & J. Rossi (Eds.), Social rights judgments and the politics of compliance: Making it stick (pp. 140–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skaar, E. (2011). Judicial independence and human rights in Latin America: Violations, politics, and prosecution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smulovitz, C. (2006). Judicialization of protest in Argentina: The case of Corralito. In E. Peruzzotti & C. Smulovitz (Eds.), Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 55–74). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. E. (2014). Environmental litigation in China: A study in political ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. (2018). Ambivalent legal mobilization: Perceptions of justice and the use of the tutela in Colombia. Law & Society Review, 52(2), 337–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca. (2004). Sección Cuarta, Subsección “B,” acción popular núm. 01-479. M.P. Nelly Yolanda Villamizar.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2006). Reading the scandals: Scandals, media, and citizenship in contemporary Argentina. In E. Peruzzotti & C. Smulovitz (Eds.), Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 272–303). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation and accountability. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. M. (2009). Institutional reform and rights revolutions in Latin America: The cases of Costa Rica and Colombia. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(2), 59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. M., & Rodríguez Cordero, J. C. (2006). Legal opportunity structures and social movements: The effects of institutional change on Costa Rican politics. Comparative Political Studies, 39(3), 325–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2010, November 11). Informe No. 54311-CO: Proyecto de adecuación hidráulica y recuperación ambiental del Río Bogotá. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, A. E., & Parra-Vera, O. (2010). Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: From social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 33(2), 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zemans, F. K. (1983). Legal mobilization: The neglected role of the law in the political system. American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar