Global Governance Meets Local Land Tenure: International Codes of Conduct for Responsible Land Investments in Uganda

References

• Alden-Wily, L. (2011, November). Customary land tenure in the modern world. Rights to resources in crisis: Reviewing the fate of customary tenure in Africa (Brief No 1). Washington, DC: Rights and Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barbanente, G., Liversage, H., Mandelli, E., & Kabuleta, R. (2018, March). Fostering transparent and evidence-based reporting on LSLBI. The case of VODP in Uganda. Paper presented at the 19th Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, S. (2002). Debating the land question in Africa. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 44(4), 638–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C. (2013). Land regimes and the structure of politics: Patterns of land-related conflict. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 83(1), 188–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C. (2014). Property and political order in Africa: Land rights and the structure of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, C. (2015). Land tenure regimes and state structure in rural Africa: Implications for forms of resistance to large-scale land acquisitions by outsiders. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 33(2), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C. (2019). Legal empowerment of the poor through property rights reform: Tensions and trade-offs of land registration and titling in sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(3), 384–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., Jr., & Franco, J. (2010). From threat to opportunity-problems with the idea of a code of conduct for land-grabbing. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 13, 507–523.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., Jr., Franco, J., & Wang, C. (2013). The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: Changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations, 10(1), 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, P., & Taylor, D. (2016). Globalization, land grabbing, and the present-day colonial state in Uganda: Ecolonization and its impacts. The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(1), 100–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldham, S. (2000). Land reform and customary rights: The case of Uganda. Journal of African Law, 44(1), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on World Food Security. (2014). Principles for responsible investments in agriculture and food systems. Rome: CFS. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs1314/rai/CFS_Principles_Oct_2014_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Enterprise and Investment Council. (2018): CWEIC welcomes horyal investments as first Ugandan strategic partner. Retrieved from https://www.cweic.org/news/cweic-welcomes-horyal-investments-as-first-ugandan-strategic-partner/
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., Byerlee, D., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H., & Stickler, M. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland. Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Edstedt, K., & Carton, W. (2018). The benefits that (only) capital can see? Resource access and degradation in industrial carbon forestry, lessons from the CDM in Uganda. Geoforum, 97, 315–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. (2013). Indirect dispossession: Domestic power imbalances and foreign access to land in Mozambique. Development and Change, 44(2), 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2012a, May 11). Countries adopt global guidelines on tenure of land, forests, fisheries. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/142587/icode/
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (ed.). (2012b). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security (ISB 978-92-5-107277-6). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Green Resources. (2016, January–December). Environmental and social impact report. Oslo: Author. Retrieved from https://www.busoga-forestry.com/Reports/GRAS%20Sustainability%20Report%202016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, D. (2004). Unintended consequences of land rights reform: The case of the 1998 Uganda land act. Development Policy Review, 22(2), 173–191.
   Google Scholar
• International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2011). Republic of Uganda: Vegetable oil development project. Interim evaluation (Report No. 2195-UG). Rome: IFAD.
   Google Scholar
• Kapstein, E. B. (2018). Governing the global land grab. Global Policy, 9(2), 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. (2014). Impacts of foreign agricultural investment on developing countries: Evidence from case studies (FAO commodity and trade policy research working paper No 47). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, C. (2008). Local politics and the dynamics of property in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, K., & Ssemwogere, D. (2017). Carbon colonialism: Failure of green resources’ carbon offset project in Uganda. Oakland, CA: The Oakland Institute. Retrieved from https://www.oaklandinstitute.org/sites/oaklandinstitute.org/files/uganda_carbon_colonialism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milgroom, J. (2015). Policy processes of a land grab: At the interface of politics ‘in the air’ and politics ‘on the ground’ in Massingir, Mozambique. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3–4), 585–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreda, T. (2017). Large-scale land acquisitions, state authority and indigenous local communities: Insights from Ethiopia. Third World Quarterly, 38(3), 698–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muwanga, D. (2020, September 21). UIA hails Atiak sugar factory for creating over 10,000 jobs. Uganda Investment Authority. Retrieved from https://www.ugandainvest.go.ug/uia-hails-atiak-sugar-factory-for-creating-over-10000-jobs/.
   Google Scholar
• National Forestry Authority. (2003). The national forestry and tree planting act, 2003. Retrieved from http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/uga87770.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Obaikol, E. (2014). Draft final report of the implementation of the land governance assessment framework in Uganda. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/611841504873425190/Draft-final-report-of-the-implementation-of-the-land-governance-assessment-framework-in-Uganda
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P. E. (2009). Challenges in land tenure and land reform in Africa: Anthropological contributions. World Development, 37(8), 1317–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P. E. (2013). Conflicts over land and threats to customary tenure in Africa. African Affairs, 112(449), 543–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platteau, J.-P. (1996). The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: Acritical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1), 29–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of Uganda. (1995). Constitution of the Republic of Uganda. Entebbe: Uganda Government Printing and Publishing Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Uganda. (1998). The Land Act, 1998. Entebbe: Uganda Government Printing and Publishing Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2013). Land grabs today: Feeding the disassembling of national territory. Globalizations, 10(1), 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanzenbaecher, B., & Allen, J. (2015, March). Responsible investments in agriculture, in practice:Resultsand conclusions from a case study review. Paper presented at the 2015 Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ugandan Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development. (2013b). Land sector strategy plan 2013 – 2023. Kampala: Republic of Uganda.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, respect and remedy” framework (HR/PUB/11/04). New York and Geneva: United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Von Braun, J., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2009, April). ‘Land Grabbing‘ by foreign investors in developing countries: Risks and opportunities (IFPRI Policy Brief No 13). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vorlaeufer, T., Schilling, F., Kirk, M., & Graefen, C. (2018, March). Responsible large-scale land investments in Uganda: Current application and potential scope of international safeguards. Paper presented at the 18th Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, B. (2017). Understanding, Preventing and solving land conflicts: A practical guide and toolbox. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Widengård, M. (2019). Land deals, and how not all states react the same: Zambia and the Chinese request. Review of African Political Economy, 46(162), 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar