Shifting the Balance: Examining the Impact of Local Labor Market Opportunities on Female Household Bargaining Power in India

References

• Adams, A. E., Tolman, R. M., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., & Kennedy, A. C. (2012). The impact of intimate partner violence on low-income women’s economic well-being: The mediating role of job stability. Violence against Women, 18(12), 1345–1367. doi:10.1177/1077801212474294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. doi:10.1080/135457097338799
   Google Scholar
• Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859. doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizer, A. (2011). Poverty, violence, and health the impact of domestic violence during pregnancy on newborn health. The Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 518–538. doi:10.1353/jhr.2011.0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., & Eswaran, M. (2009). What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anukriti, S. (2018). Financial incentives and the fertility-sex ratio trade-off. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Barik, D., Desai, S., & Vanneman, R. (2018). Economic status and adult mortality in India: Is the relationship sensitive to choice of indicators? World Development, 103, 176–187. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (Enlarged edition). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining power within couples and use of prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia. Studies in Family Planning, 32(2), 130–146. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00130.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. J., Katz, L. F., Hall, R. E., & Eichengreen, B. (1992). Regional evolutions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992(1), 1–76. doi:10.2307/2534556
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043. doi:10.1257/00028280260344588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borusyak, K., Hull, P., & Jaravel, X. (2022). Quasi-experimental shift-share research designs. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(1), 181–213. doi:10.1093/restud/rdab030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte, E., Tu, Q., & List, J. (2015). Battle of the sexes: How sex ratios affect female bargaining power. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 64(1), 143–161. doi:10.1086/682706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, R., & Keskar, A. (2021, January 1). ‘Til dowry do us part’: Bargaining and violence in Indian families (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15696). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3783911.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2014). Gender wage gap in the Indian labour market: Evidence from the NSS 66th round data. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 57(2), 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., & Poddar, P. (2019). Maternal health, children education and women empowerment: Quasi-experimental evidence from India (No. 332). GLO Discussion Paper. Hamberg, Germany: Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. A. (2000). Perpetual mourning: Widowhood in rural India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, Y. M. (2012). Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction?: Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 175–200. doi:10.1007/s00148-011-0382-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S. B., Dubey, A., Joshi, B. L., Sen, M., Shariff, A., & Vanneman, R. (2010). Human development in India. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbelsteen, S., & Kooreman, P. (1997). Financial management, bargaining and efficiency within the household. De Economist, 145(3), 345–366. doi:10.1023/A:1003008229588
   Google Scholar
• Dommaraju, P. (2016). Divorce and separation in India. Population and Development Review, 42(2), 195–223. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doss, C. R. (1996). Testing among models of intrahousehold resource allocation. World Development, 24(10), 1597–1609. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, J., Kortum, S., Neiman, B., & Romalis, J. (2016). Trade and the global recession. American Economic Review, 106(11), 3401–3438. doi:10.1257/aer.20101557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eswaran, M., & Malhotra, N. (2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1222–1263. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55(3), 337–358. doi:10.1080/00346769700000004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Sorkin, I., & Swift, H. (2020). Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586–2624. doi:10.1257/aer.20181047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. (2014). Women’s access to labor market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 57, 32–46. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R., & Mushfiq Mobarak, A. (2015). Manufacturing growth and the lives of Bangladeshi women. Journal of Development Economics, 115, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitczenko, M. (2016). The influence of gender and income on the household division of financial responsibility (Working Paper No. 16–20, pp. 1–31). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(8), 797–810. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 675–692. doi:10.2307/351768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. (2005). Caste, culture, and the status and well-being of widows in India. In: Wise DA (Ed.). Analyses in the economics of aging (pp. 357–376). University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226903217.003.0012
   Google Scholar
• Kalokhe, A., Del Rio, C., Dunkle, K., Stephenson, R., Metheny, N., Paranjape, A., & Sahay, S. (2017). Domestic violence against women in India: A systematic review of a decade of quantitative studies. Global Public Health, 12(4), 498–513. doi:10.1080/17441692.2015.1119293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, S. M., Hassan, C. H., Alam, G. M., & Ying, Y. (2015). Child marriage in Bangladesh: Trends and determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science, 47(1), 120–139. doi:10.1017/S0021932013000746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35–78. doi:10.2307/2118323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, N., & Munshi, K. (2011). Women as agents of change: Female income and mobility in India. Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 947–958. doi:10.2307/354015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail, F., & Dong, X. Y. (2007). Women’s market work and household status in rural China: Evidence from Jiangsu and Shandong in the late 1990s. Feminist Economics, 13(3–4), 93–124. doi:10.1080/13545700701439457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatro, M., Gupta, R. N., & Gupta, V. (2012). The risk factor of domestic violence in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(3), 153–157. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.99912
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majlesi, K. (2016). Labor market opportunities and women’s decision making power within households. Journal of Development Economics, 119, 34–47. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21(1), 31–44. doi:10.2307/2526238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (1995). Women’s education and fertility: Results from 26 demographic and health surveys. Studies in Family Planning, 26(4), 187–202. doi:10.2307/2137845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, A., & Slavov, S. (2013). Escaping domestic violence: Empowering women through employment, earnings and wealth in India. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349. doi:10.2307/2526280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, S. (2020). The effect of marital endowments on domestic violence in India. Journal of Development Economics, 143, 102389. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. (2014). Son preference in India: implications for gender development. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(4), 1021–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookerjee, M., Ojha, M., & Roy, S. (2022). Who’s your neighbour? Social influences on domestic violence. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(2), 350–369. doi:10.1080/00220388.2021.1969012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823–850. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, B. (2004). India’s Silicon Valley or Silicon Valley’s India? Socially embedding the computer software industry in Bangalore. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 664–685. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00542.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollak, R. A. (2019). How bargaining in marriage drives marriage market equilibrium. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 297–321.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1251–1285. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. R., & Stark, O. (1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: Evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 905–926. doi:10.1086/261633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1956). Social indifference curves. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 1–22. doi:10.2307/1884510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, J. (2016). Booms, busts, and fertility testing the Becker model using gender-specific labor demand. Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 1–29. doi:10.3368/jhr.51.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. New York: New York Review of Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., Thomas, D., Frankenberg, E., Beegle, K., & Teruel, G. (2002). Wages, employment and economic shocks: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Population Economics, 15(1), 161–193. doi:10.1007/PL00003837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauchen, H. V., Witte, A. D., & Long, S. K. (1991). Domestic violence: A nonrandom affair. International Economic Review, 491–511.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. The Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 635–664. doi:10.2307/145670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence against Women, 7(2), 141–158. doi:10.1177/1077801201007002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal, A. (2007). Women’s employment status, coercive control, and intimate partner violence in Mexico. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 418–434. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, A. (2014). Women’s and men’s relative status and intimate partner violence in India. Population and Development Review, 40(1), 55–75. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2021). Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) [Data file]. World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS?view=chart
   Google Scholar