125
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Visible Consumption, Income Inequality and Social Comparisons. Evidence from Four Latin American CountriesFootnote

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 511-532 | Received 12 Mar 2021, Accepted 29 Jan 2024, Published online: 25 Feb 2024

References

  • Akay, A., Martinsson, P., & Medhin, H. (2012). Does positional concern matter in poor societies? Evidence from a survey experiment in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 40(2), 428–435. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.06.004
  • Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3), 405–421. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2002.10.007
  • Alvaredo, F., & Gasparini, L. (2015). Recent trends in inequality and poverty in developing countries. In Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F. (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 697–805). North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 527–539. doi:10.1162/003465397557015
  • Baudrillard, J. (2009). La sociedad de consumo. (1st ed., in French: 1970). Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.
  • Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2016). Trickle-down consumption. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(5), 863–879. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00613
  • Bilancini, E., & Boncinelli, L. (2012). Redistribution and the notion of social status. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9-10), 651–657. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.007
  • Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 443–450. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476536
  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). La distinción. Criterio y bases sociales del buen gusto (1st ed., in French: 1979). Madrid: Editorial Taurus.
  • Bowles, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? The Economic Journal, 115(507), F397–F412. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
  • Calvo, G. A. (1996). Capital flows and macroeconomic management: Tequila lessons. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1(3), 207–223. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1158(199607)1:3<207::AID-IJFE21>3.0.CO;2-3
  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carlsson, F., Gupta, G., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). Keeping up with the Vaishyas? Caste and relative standing in India. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(1), 52–73. doi:10.1093/oep/gpn015
  • Carlsson, F., Khanh Nam, P., Linde-Rahr, M., & Martinsson, P. (2007). Are Vietnamese farmers concerned with their relative position in society? The Journal of Development Studies, 43(7), 1177–1188. doi:10.1080/00220380701526303
  • Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., & Henrik, J. (2008). Value of Statistical Life and Cause of Accident: A Choice Experiment. Working Papers in Economics 332, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
  • Chai, A., Kaus, W., & Kiedaisch, C. (2019). Conspicuous spending and the income distribution of social groups. Economic Inquiry, 57(3), 1324–1341. doi:10.1111/ecin.12756
  • Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–467. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.425
  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7
  • Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144. doi:10.1257/jel.46.1.95
  • Cortina, A. (2002). Por una ética del consumo. Madrid: Taurus.
  • De Melo, G. (2012). Essays on social interactions [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Siena.
  • Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • ECLAC. (2014). Pactos para la igualdad: Hacia un futuro sostenible. Santiago: ECLAC.
  • Edwards, S., & Végh, C. A. (1997). Banks and macroeconomic disturbances under predetermined exchange rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40(2), 239–278. doi:10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00043-3
  • Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and wellbeing: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 997–1019. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003
  • Frank, R. (1999). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: The Free Press.
  • Frank, R. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75(1), 101–116.
  • Frank, R. H., Levine, A. S., & Dijk, O. (2014). Expenditure Cascades. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1 (1-2), 55–73. doi:10.1561/105.00000003
  • Galbraith, J. K. (1998). The affluent society. (1st edition: 1958). New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.
  • Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. (2014). Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. American Economic Review, 104(5), 348–353. doi:10.1257/aer.104.5.348
  • Harriger-Lin, J., Khanna, N., & Pape, A. (2020). Conspicuous consumption and peer-group inequality: The role of preferences. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 18(3), 365–389. doi:10.1007/s10888-020-09447-6
  • Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1101–1117. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00116
  • Heffetz, O., & Frank, R. (2011). Preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications. In Benhabib, J. Jackson, O., and Bisin, A. (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1A, pp. 69–91). The Netherlands: North-Holland.
  • Hillesheim, I., & Mechtel, M. (2011). What makes us want to have more than others? Explaining relative consumption effects of public and private goods. University of Tübingen working papers in economics and finance, No. 4. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-55952
  • Hirschman, A., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development with a mathematical appendix. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566. doi:10.2307/1882024
  • Hopkins, E., & Kornienko, T. (2004). Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game of status. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1085–1107. doi:10.1257/0002828042002705
  • Kaus, W. (2013). Conspicuous consumption and race: Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 63–73. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.004
  • Leites, M., Salas, G., & Vigorito, V. (2019). ¿El consumo de qué bienes genera estatus? Evidencia en base a su visibilidad. Serie documentos de trabajo del Instituto de Economía.
  • Leites, M., Paleo, C., Ramos, X., & Salas, G. (2022). Choosing or inheriting the joneses: The origins of reference groups. IZA Discussion Paper No. 15584. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4232713
  • Manski, R. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. doi:10.2307/2298123
  • Maurer, J., & Meier, A. (2008). Smooth it like the ‘Joneses’? Estimating peer‐group effects in intertemporal consumption choice. The Economic Journal, 118(527), 454–476. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02129.x
  • Oh, S. Y., Park, Y., & Bowles, S. (2012). Veblen effects, political representation, and the reduction in working time over the 20th century. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(2), 218–242. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.006
  • Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41. doi:10.1086/658165
  • Prebisch, R. (1984). Five stages in my thinking on development. In Meier G. and Seers D. (eds.), Pioneers in Development, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
  • Rius, A., & Román, C. (2021). Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse-Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos de Economía, 40(82), 193–225.
  • Roychowdhury, P. (2016). Visible inequality, status competition, and conspicuous consumption: Evidence from rural India. Oxford Economic Papers, 69(1), 36–54. doi:10.1093/oep/gpw056
  • Roychowdhury, P. (2019). Peer effects in consumption in India: An instrumental variables approach using negative idiosyncratic shocks. World Development, 114, 122–137. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.028
  • Schor, J. (1997). New analytic bases for an economic critique of the consumer society. In Goodwin, N. R., Ackerman, F., and Kiron, D. (Eds.), The consumer society (pp. 31–33). Washington, Island Press.
  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010
  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.
  • Vendrik, M., & Woltjer, G. (2007). Happiness and loss aversion: Is utility concave or convex in relative income? Journal of Public Economics, 91(7-8), 1423–1448. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.