Development and Validation of the Trait Sexual Motivation Scale (TSMS)

References

• Ågmo, A., & Laan, E. (2022a). Sexual incentive motivation, sexual behavior, and general arousal: Do rats and humans tell the same story? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 135, 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ågmo, A., & Laan, E. (2022b). The sexual incentive motivation model and its clinical applications. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2134978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. S., & Walter, E. E. (2018). Linking big five personality traits to sexuality and sexual health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend, M. G., & Schäfer, T. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv:1406.5823 [Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E. (2014). Sexy building blocks: The contribution of the sexual system to attachment formation and maintenance. In Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 315–332). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14250-018
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E. (2018). The fragile spell of desire: A functional perspective on changes in sexual desire across relationship development. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 22(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317715350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Mizrahi, M., Recanati, M., & Orr, R. (2019). What fantasies can do to your relationship: The effects of sexual fantasies on couple interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218789611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Kievit, R. A., Scholten, A. Z., & Franic, S. (2009). The end of construct validity. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–170). IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Both, S., Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2004). Sexual behavior and responsiveness to sexual stimuli following laboratory-induced sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109360993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. L., Janssen, E., Graham, C. A., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2011). The sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales-short form. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 236–239). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher’s corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, A. H., Kingsberg, S. A., & Goldstein, I. (2018). Evaluation and management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Sexual Medicine, 6(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S., Katz, J., & Jackson, J. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018721417683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenbach, J., Weber, M., Loschelder, D. D., Kilger, H., & Friese, M. (2022). Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences. Psychological Bulletin, 148(9-10), 621–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
   Google Scholar
• Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Self-regulation and sexual restraint: Dispositionally and temporarily poor self-regulatory abilities contribute to failures at restraining sexual behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206293472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2012). Sexual arousal and desire: Interrelations and responses to three modalities of sexual stimuli. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(9), 2315–2329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, O., MacKinnon, D. P., & Muniz, F. B. (2021). Extrinsic convergent validity evidence to prevent jingle and jangle fallacies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1707061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., & Scherer, R. (2018). Still comparing apples with oranges? Some thoughts on the principles and practices of measurement invariance testing. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(3), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2017). Use of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in examining measurement invariance in counseling psychology research. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 6(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v6i1.120
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The sexual inhibition (SIS) and sexual excitation (SES) scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., & DeBruine, L. M. (2018). General sexual desire, but not desire for uncommitted sexual relationships, tracks changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., McNeish, D. M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). The role of measurement quality on practical guidelines for assessing measurement and structural invariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415603764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., Muise, A., Barranti, M., Mark, K. P., Rosen, N. O., Harasymchuk, C., & Impett, E. (2021). Are couples more satisfied when they match in sexual desire? New insights from response surface analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620926770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Schmidt, A. F., Turner, D., & Briken, P. (2015). Are sex drive and hypersexuality associated with pedophilic interest and child sexual abuse in a male community sample? PLoS One, 10(7), e0129730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S. B. (2003). The nature of sexual desire: A clinician’s perspective. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023421819465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. (2006). Is high sex drive associated with increased sexual attraction to both sexes? It depends on whether you are male or female. Psychological Science, 17(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01663.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3(3), 635–694. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635
   Google Scholar
• Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2022). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P. (2012). The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2012.678825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, K. P., Toland, M. D., Rosenkrantz, D. E., Brown, H. M., & Hong, S. (2018). Validation of the sexual desire inventory for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer adults. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000260
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D., & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1148–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0602-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, F. A., Bang, H., Boe, O., Martinsen, Ø. L., Lang-Ree, O. C., & Røysamb, E. (2020). The multidimensional self-control scale (MSCS): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 32(11), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, C. D., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264754
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2022). Single and partnered individuals’ sexual satisfaction as a function of sexual desire and activities: Results using a sexual satisfaction scale demonstrating measurement invariance across partnership status. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02153-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Rothschild, D., Gordon, A., Evernden, Z., & Damer, E. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, S. D., Bogart, L. M., Cecil, H., & Abramson, P. R. (2003). Factors associated with masturbation in a collegiate sample. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 14(2-3), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v14n02_07
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: DR, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnerus, M., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2016). Documenting pornography use in America: A comparative analysis of methodological approaches. Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1096886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of sexual motivation in natural menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63(4), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röseler, L., Wolf, D., Leder, J., & Schütz, A. (2020). Test-retest reliability is not a measure of reliability or stability: A friendly reminder. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mt49r
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnev, M., Lytkina, E., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Zick, A. (2018). Testing measurement invariance for a second-order factor. A cross-national test of the alienation scale. Methods, Data, Analyses: A Journal for Quantitative Methods and Survey Methodology (Mda), 12(1), 47–76. https://doi.org/10.12758/MDA.2017.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., Fisher, A. N., & Kilshaw, R. E. (2021). Dyadic measurement invariance and its importance for replicability in romantic relationship science. Personal Relationships, 28(1), 190–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L. J. (2008). Classical and modern methods of psychological scale construction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00044.x
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The sexual desire inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 22(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239608414655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R., Kagerer, S., Walter, B., Vaitl, D., Klucken, T., & Wehrum-Osinsky, S. (2015). Trait sexual motivation questionnaire: Concept and validation. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(4), 1080–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46(2-3), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Medina, P., Rojas-Paoli, I., & Álvarez-Muelas, A. (2020). Validation of the sexual desire inventory in Colombia. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1739181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar