504
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analyzing the Factor Structure of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Measurement Invariance and One-Year Stability of the German Version

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 230-241 | Received 16 Dec 2022, Accepted 31 May 2023, Published online: 03 Jul 2023

References

  • Abler, B., & Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion regulation questionnaire–Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John. Diagnostica, 55(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.144
  • Baldner, C., & McGinley, J. J. (2014). Correlational and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) of commonly used empathy questionnaires: New insights. Motivation and Emotion, 38(5), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9417-2
  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
  • Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)), 57(1), 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae: Handanweisung. Hogrefe. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1902849
  • Bošnjaković, J., & Radionov, T. (2018). Empathy: Concepts, theories and neuroscientific basis. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research: Journal on Psychiatric Research and Addictions, 54(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.20471/dec.2018.54.02.04
  • Buja, A., & Eyuboglu, N. (1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(4), 509–540. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2704_2
  • Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
  • Chiorri, C. (2016). Competing factor structures for the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire. In D. F. Watt & J. Panksepp (Eds.), Psychology and neurobiology of empathy (pp. 399–432). Nova Science.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
  • Deckers, M., Schönefeld, V., Altmann, T., & Roth, M. (2021). Forschungsergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit des empCARE-Konzeptes. empCARE (pp. 149–174). Springer.
  • Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. Plos One, 10(3), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
  • Doherty, R. W. (1997). The emotional contagion scale: A measure of individual differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024956003661
  • Falkenberg, I. (2005). Wahrnehmung und Expression von Emotionen durch Mimik: Eine Untersuchung über emotionale Ansteckung bei Gesunden und Patienten mit Schizophrenie. Universität Tübingen.
  • Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., & Lietz, C. A. (2010). Conceptualising and measuring empathy. British Journal of Social Work, 40(7), 2326–2343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq048
  • Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8
  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
  • Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442
  • Henson, J. M., Reise, S. P., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336744
  • Heynen, E. J. E., Van der Helm, G. H. P., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Korebrits, A. M. (2016). Measuring empathy in a German youth prison: A validation of the German version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a sample of incarcerated juvenile offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217
  • Hirschfeld, G., & von Brachel, R. (2014). Improving Multiple-Group confirmatory factor analysis in R–A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 19(1), 7.
  • Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.4.800
  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580
  • Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T., Veloski, J. J., & Kane, G. (2001). Empathy in medical education and patient care. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 76(7), 669–669. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200107000-00001
  • Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
  • Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y. (2021). Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
  • Kaviani, H., & Kinman, G. (2017). Relationships between psychosocial characteristics and democratic values in Iranians: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 12–22.
  • Kemper, C. J., Beierlein, C., Bensch, D., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Gamma-Faktors sozial erwünschten Antwortverhaltens: Die Kurzskala Soziale Erwünschtheit-Gamma (KSE-G) (GESIS-Working Papers, 2012/25). GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Körner, A., Geyer, M., Roth, M., Drapeau, M., Schmutzer, G., Albani, C., Schumann, S., & Brähler, E. (2008). Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik mit dem neo-fünf-faktoren-inventar: Die 30-item-kurzversion (neo-ffi-30). Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 58(6), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-986199
  • Kourmousi, N., Amanaki, E., Tzavara, C., Merakou, K., Barbouni, A., & Koutras, V. (2017). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a nationwide sample of Greek teachers. Social Sciences, 6(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020062
  • Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703001624
  • Lelorain, S., Sultan, S., Zenasni, F., Catu-Pinault, A., Jaury, P., Boujut, E., & Rigal, L. (2013). Empathic concern and professional characteristics associated with clinical empathy in French general practitioners. The European Journal of General Practice, 19(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2012.709842
  • Lima, F. F. d., & Osório, F. d. L. (2021). Empathy: Assessment instruments and psychometric quality—A systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of the past ten years. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 781346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781346
  • Luckhurst, C., Hatfield, E., & Gelvin-Smith, C. (2017). Capacity for empathy and emotional contagion in those with psychopathic personalities. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 11(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v11i1.247
  • Mehrabian, A. (2000). Manual for the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES). Unpublished manuscript. Available from Albert Mehrabian, 1130 Alta Mesa Road, Monterey, CA 93940.
  • Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
  • Melchers, M., Montag, C., Markett, S., & Reuter, M. (2015). Assessment of empathy via self-report and behavioural paradigms: Data on convergent and discriminant validity. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 20(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2014.991781
  • Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2020). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (3. Aufl. 2020 ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61532-4
  • Morawetz, C., Berboth, S., Kohn, N., Jackson, P. L., & Jauniaux, J. (2022). Reappraisal and empathic perspective-taking—More alike than meets the eyes. NeuroImage, 255, 119194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119194
  • Mulet, M., Vuillemin, Q., Lachaux, J., Trousselard, M., & Ferrer, M.-H. (2022). Perceived stress, personality traits, and state of victim’s consciousness: Impact on tourniquet application time and effectiveness. Military Medicine, 187(9–10), e1216–e1224. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab092
  • Novak, L., Malinakova, K., Mikoska, P., van Dijk, J. P., Dechterenko, F., Ptacek, R., & Tavel, P. (2021). Psychometric analysis of the Czech version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105343
  • Paulus, C. (2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9249
  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
  • Ray, J. J. (1983). Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9924470
  • Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
  • Schlegel, K., & Scherer, K. R. (2016). Introducing a short version of the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT-S): Psychometric properties and construct validation. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0646-4
  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4
  • Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775495/pdf/nihms-74226.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
  • Stewart, C., Lawrence, S., & Burg, M. A. (2019). Exploring the Relationship of personality characteristics and spirituality to empathy: Does spirituality add to our understanding? Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 38(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2018.1548953
  • Swain, S. D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R. W. (2008). Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116
  • Titchener, E. (1909). Elementary psychology of the thought process. Macmillan.
  • Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540120
  • Totan, T., Dogan, T., & Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish University Students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 12(46), 179–198.
  • Ursoniu, S., Serban, C. L., Giurgi-Oncu, C., Rivis, I. A., Bucur, A., Bredicean, A.-C., & Papava, I. (2021). Validation of the Romanian Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among undergraduate medical students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 12871. https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/ijerph/ijerph-18-12871/article_deploy/ijerph-18-12871-v2.pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412871
  • Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557
  • Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012). Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0368
  • Windmann, S., Binder, L., & Schultze, M. (2021). Constructing the Facets of Altruistic Behaviors (FAB) Scale. Social Psychology, 52(5), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000460
  • Xu, R. H., Wong, E. L. Y., Lu, S. Y. J., Zhou, L. M., Chang, J. H., & Wang, D. (2020). Validation of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among medical students in China: Analyses using three psychometric methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00810
  • Yeo, S., & Kim, K. J. (2021). A validation study of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire for the measurement of medical students’ empathy. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.