378
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 145-155 | Received 07 Nov 2022, Accepted 09 Jun 2023, Published online: 07 Jul 2023

References

  • Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1321–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2016). Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports. Journal of Research in Personality, 64, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.008
  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2020). Recovering the HEXACO personality factors—and psychoticism—from variable sets assessing normal and abnormal personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 41(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000305
  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838
  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
  • Bader, M., Hartung, J., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). Themes of the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001006
  • Bucher, M. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2019). Development of a short form of the abridged Big Five-dimensional circumplex model to aid with the organization of personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1413382
  • Bucher, M. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2020). Developing a short form of the IPIP Abridged Big Five-Dimensional Circumplex (AB5C) congruent with the AB5C circumplex locations. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 104007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104007
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "Description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. The American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
  • Heck, D. W., Thielmann, I., Moshagen, M., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(4), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500009232
  • Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., Thielmann, I., & Zettler, I. (2022). Making rights from wrongs: The crucial role of beliefs and justifications for the expression of aversive personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(11), 2730–2755. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001232
  • Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2018). Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO Frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013
  • Horwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2019). Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028
  • Kajonius, P. J., & Johnson, J. (2018). Sex differences in 30 facets of the five factor model of personality in the large public (N= 320,128). Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.026
  • Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. The American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1001–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x
  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., Bourdage, J. S., & Ogunfowora, B. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014059
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134
  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2020). Sex differences in HEXACO personality characteristics across countries and ethnicities. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12551
  • Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2019a). On the ubiquity and importance of antagonism. In D. R. Lynam & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of antagonism (pp. 1–24). Academic Press.
  • Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2019b). The basic trait of Antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.012
  • Mac Giolla, E., & Kajonius, P. J. (2019). Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: Replicating and extending a surprising finding. International Journal of Psychology, 54(6), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12529
  • Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1070–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000004
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.81
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7
  • McCrae, R. R., Martin, T. A., Hrebícková, M., Urbánek, T., Boomsma, D. I., Willemsen, G., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00517.x
  • Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., Maples, J., & Price, J. (2011). A comparison of agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: Consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy. Assessment, 18(3), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411671
  • Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111
  • Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000778
  • Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622
  • Perugini, M. (2020). Why … the HEXACO model should be preferred as a basic personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 34, 542–543.
  • Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289451
  • Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2021). A comparison of the validity of very brief measures of the Big Five/Five-Factor Model of personality. Assessment, 28(3), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120939160
  • Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2021). The circumplex of personality metatraits and the HEXACO model: Toward refinement and integration. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12616
  • Thielmann, I., Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B., & Zettler, I. (2022). On the comparability of basic personality models: Meta-analytic correspondence, scope, and orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 36(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211026793
  • Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2020). Seeing me, seeing you: Testing competing accounts of assumed similarity in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000222
  • Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
  • Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.