Constructing Sexual Victimization: A Thematic Analysis of Reader Responses to A Literary Female-on-Male Rape Story on Goodreads

References

• Abrams, J. (2018). The #MeToo movement: An invitation for feminist critique of rape crisis framing. University of Richmond Law Review, 52(4), 749–793. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol52/iss4/2/
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bourrier, K., & Thelwall, Μ. (2020). The social lives of books: Reading victorian literature on Goodreads. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.12049
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.4324/9780203299968
   Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (1998). Similar but different: Men’s and women’s experiences of sexual coercion. In P. B. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women: Current perspectives and controversies (pp. 144–168). Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., & Brazão, N. (2020). Women’s sexual violence of male intimate partners. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of domestic violence (pp. 241–254). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., & Nobre, P. J. (2015). Psychosexual characteristics of women reporting sexual aggression against men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(15), 2539–2555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515579504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Walters, M. L., Gilbert, L. K., & Patel, N. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/vio0000252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (2018). The ideal victim. In M. Duggan (Ed.), Revisiting the ‘ideal victim.’ Developments in critical victimology (pp. 11–23). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clements-Schreiber, M. E., & Rempel, J. K. (1995). Women’s acceptance of stereotypes about male sexuality: Correlations with strategies to influence reluctant partners. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 4(4), 223–231. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-03434-001
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. (2014). Male rape is a feminist issue. Feminism, governmentality and male rape. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035103
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. (2020). Problematizing ‘pro-feminist’ depictions of female on male rape: American Horror Story’s ‘rape of the monsignor.’ Crime, Media, Culture, 16(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659019836276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupchik, G. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture & Psychology, 8(2), 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X02008002437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Gilston, J., & Rogers, P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, M. E., Covan, E. K., Swan, S. C., & Billings, D. L. (2013). Exploring rape myths, gendered norms, group processing, and the social context of rape among college women: A qualitative analysis. Violence Against Women, 19(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213487044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K. M., & Neal, A. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 112–121. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0038656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2008). The ethics of internet research. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 23–41). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992
   Google Scholar
• Field, R. E. (2020). Writing the survivor: The rape novel in late twentieth-century American fiction. Clemson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, N. L., & Pina, A. (2013). An overview of the literature on female-perpetrated adult male sexual victimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. R. (2002). Discourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1271–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102762478019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to #MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718794647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, J. (2018). Towards an inclusive victimology and a new understanding of public compassion to victims: From and beyond Christie’s ideal victim. In M. Duggan (Ed.), Revisiting the ‘ideal victim.’ Developments in critical victimology (pp. 297–312). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447338765.003.0018
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. (2006). Male rape and the careful construction of the male victim. Social Legal Studies, 15(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663906063571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory. Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1075/upal.34
   Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, J. (2007). Tracing foregrounding in responses to film. Language and Literature, 16(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075980
   Google Scholar
• Halász, L. (1991). Emotional effect and reminding in literary processing. Poetics, 20(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90009-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healicon, A. (2016). The politics of sexual violence. Rape, identity and feminism. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461728
   Google Scholar
• Hequembourg, A. L., Parks, K. A., Collins, R. L., & Hughes, T. L. (2015). Sexual assault risks among gay and bisexual men. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.856836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, F. C., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, L. A., & Silver, B. R. (1991). Introduction: Rereading rape. In L. A. Higgins & B. R. Silver (Eds.), Rape and representation (pp. 1–11). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1988). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and thought: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 188–204). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. (2020). Fiction as feminist pedagogy: An examination of curriculum and teaching strategies embodied in the novel. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1572601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2015). Male rape myths: Understanding and explaining social attitudes surrounding male rape. Masculinities and Social Change, 4(3), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2015.1579
   Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2018). Male rape, masculinities and sexualities. Understanding, policing and overcoming male sexual victimization. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52639-3
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes, Y. (2015). Media and crime. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. J., & Wardle, C. (2008). ‘No emotion, no sympathy’: The visual construction of maxine carr. Crime, Media, Culture, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659007087271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsta, A. (1994). Deadlier than the male: Violence and aggression in women. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Kneepkens, E. W. E. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and text comprehension. Poetics, 23(1–2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. M. (2018). Does originality evoke understanding? The relation between literary reading and empathy. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. M., Hilscher, M., & Cupchik, G. C. (2012). Reader responses to literary depictions of rape. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories. The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Langenderfer-Magruder, L., Walls, N. E., Kattari, S. K., Whitfield, D. L., & Ramos, D. (2016). Sexual victimization and subsequent police reporting by gender identity among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., & Laszlo, J. (1990). Cultural historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(5), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., & Seilman, U. (1988). Personal remindings while reading literature. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.4.411
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K. L. (2005). No penis, no problem. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(2), 357. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol33/iss2/3/
   Google Scholar
• Levy, I., & Adam, K. (2018). Online commenting about a victim of female-on-male rape: The case of Shia LaBeouf’s sexual victimization. Sex Roles, 79(9–10), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0893-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. (1995). Doubly deviant, doubly damned: Society’s treatment of violent women. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lundrigan, S., & Mueller-Johnson, K. (2013). Male stranger rape: A behavioral model of victim offender interaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812474451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdawi, A. (2018, July 2). Why write a novel about a brutal female rapist in the age of #MeToo? Amber Tamblyn explains. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jul/02/amber-tamblyn-times-up-me-too-any-man-debut-novel
   Google Scholar
• McMullen, R. J. (1990). Male rape: Breaking the silence on the last taboo. Gay Men’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30(4), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura, L. (2013). “Words with friends”: Socially networked reading on Goodreads. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 128(1), 238–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.1.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, B. (2001). Reporting violence in the British print media: Gendered stories. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(20), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00200
   Google Scholar
• Nikolajeva, M. (2014). Reading for learning: Cognitive approaches to children’s literature. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/clcc.3
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5–6), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. Green, J. Strange, & T. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39–69). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606648
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., Byers, E. S., & Finkelman, L. (1998). A comparison of male and female college students’ experiences of sexual coercion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(2), 177–195. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of initiator gender and tactics. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 87–95. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00224490609552302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Projansky, S. (2001). Watching rape: Film and television in postfeminist culture. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, S. J. (1983). Once is enough: Causal reasoning from a single instance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 323–334. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeser, T. W., & Spalding, S. D. (2002). Reading literature/culture: A translation of “reading as a cultural practice.” Style, 36(4), 659–675. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.36.4.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumney, P., & Morgan-Taylor, M. (1997). Recognizing the male victim: Gender neutrality and the law of rape: Part two. Anglo-American Law Review, 26(3), 330–356. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/comlwr26&div=22
   Google Scholar
• Schatzel-Murphy, E., Harris, D., Knight, R., & Milburn, M. (2009). Sexual coercion in men and women: Similar behaviors, different predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(6), 974–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9481-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer-Bassani, P. B. (2011). Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education, 56(4), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder, J. A., Scherer, H. L., & Fisher, B. S. (2018). Interpersonal violence among college students: Does sexual orientation impact risk of victimization? Journal of School Violence, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2016.1190934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemple, L., & Meyer, I. H. (2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301946
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stinson, E., & Discroll, B. (2020). Difficult literature on Goodreads: Reading alexis wright’s the swan book. Textual Practice, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2020.1786718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and fiction can influence judgments of a social problem’s urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27(3–4), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Anderson, P. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 76–86. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00224490309552168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, S. J. (2000). Fiction reading in America: Explaining the gender gap. Poetics, 27(4), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075985
   Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 867–887. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S. (2004). Gender, crime and criminal justice (2nd ed.). Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weare, S. (2018). ‘Oh you’re a guy, how could you be raped by a woman, that makes no sense’: Towards a case for legally recognising and labelling ‘forced-to-penetrate’ cases as rape. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552317000179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K. G. (2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men’s experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08322632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., & Lange, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding. Memory & Cognition, 24(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar