Identifying the Impact of Sexual Scripts on Consent Negotiations

References

• Adams, B. J., Turner, B., Wang, X., Marro, R., Miller, E., Phillips, G., II, & Coulter, R. W. S. (2020). Associations between LGBTQ-affirming school climate and intimate partner violence victimization among adolescents. Prevention Science, 22(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01192-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M. (2013). Gender and BDSM revisited: Reflections on a decade of researching kink communities. Psychology of Women Section Review, 15(2), 20–28. http://oro.open.ac.uk/40957/
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. C. (2013). Hard to get: Twenty-something women and the paradox of sexual freedom. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037428.41757.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800981
   Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S., & O’sullivan, L. F. (1996). Sexual coercion in dating relationships. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800981
   Google Scholar
• Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Whitfield, C. L., Brown, D. W., Felitti, V. J., Dong, M., & Giles, W. H. (2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dune, T. M. (2014). Conceptualizing sex with cerebral palsy: A phenomenological exploration of private constructions of sexuality using sexual script theory. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 20–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v2i2.287
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., Lewis, I. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14(1), 19–28. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/0145-2134(90)90077-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory & Psychology, 11(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301112004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. M. (2011). Consensual unwanted sex: Motivations and reservations [Doctoral dissertation]. University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
   Google Scholar
• French, B. (2013). More than jezebels and freaks: Exploring how Black girls navigate sexual coercion and sexual scripts. Journal of African American Studies, 17(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-012-9218-1
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Aldine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129242
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. L., Clark, M. D., & Anderson, M. L. (2012). Do deaf individuals’ dating scripts follow the traditional sexual script? Sexuality & Culture, 16(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9111-4
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. I. (2008). Erotic habitus: Toward a sociology of desire. Theory and Society, 37(6), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). ‘By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom’: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2010). Rehabilitating interactionism for a feminist sociology of sexuality. Sociology, 44(5), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375732
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., & Hoover, S. M. (2015). The potential of sexual consent interventions on college campuses: A literature review on the barriers to establishing affirmative sexual consent. PURE Insights, 4, Article 5. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/pure/vol4/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Kolpin, S. (2000). Ambiguous communication of sexual intentions as a risk marker of sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 42(5), 313–337. https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007080303569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, E. (2017). ‘We can write the scripts ourselves’: Queer challenges to heteronormative courtship practices. Gender & Society, 31(5), 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217723883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. S., Ward, L. M., & Neilson, E. C. (2012). Formative sexual communications, sexual agency, and coercion, and youth sexual health. Social Service Review, 86(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1086/667785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths. In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069987
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. (2016). Beyond monogamy: Polyamory and the future of polyqueer sexualities. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of a measure of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 45(5), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815623686
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2006). Poly-hegemonic masculinities. Sexualities, 9(5), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706070004
   Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, L. J. (2015). Ace of (BDSM) clubs: Building asexual relationships through BDSM practice. Sexualities, 18(5–6), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460714550907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. P., & Phillips, L. D. (2003). Freaks, gold diggers, divas, and dykes: The sociohistorical development of adolescent African American women’s sexual scripts. Sexuality and Culture, 7(1), 3–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03159848
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. P., & Phillips, L. (2005). Integrating Black feminist thought into conceptual frameworks of African American adolescent women’s sexual scripting processes. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 7(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660500112725
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todahl, J. L., Linville, D., Bustin, A., Wheeler, J., & Gau, J. (2009). Sexual support services and community systems: Understanding critical issues and needs in the LGBTQ community. Violence Against Women, 15(8), 952–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209335494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2011). Communicating interest in sex: Verbal and nonverbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., Rosenscruggs, D., & Aguinaldo, E. R. (2022). A scripted sexuality: Media, gendered sexual scripts, and their impact on our lives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221101072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (2002). Sexuality and its discontents: Meanings, myths, and modern sexualities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar