Clickable Consent: How Men Who Have Sex with Men Understand and Practice Sexual Consent on Dating Apps and in Person

References

• Ahlm, J. (2017). Respectable promiscuity: Digital cruising in an era of queer liberalism. Sexualities, 20(3), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346071666578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albury, K., & Byron, P. (2016). Safe on my phone? Same-sex attracted young people’s negotiations of intimacy, visibility, and risk on digital hook-up apps. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albury, K., Byron, P., McCosker, A., Pym, T., Walshe, J., Race, K., Salon, D., Reeders, D., Wark, T., Botfield, J., & Dietzel, C. (2019). Safety, risk and wellbeing on dating apps: Final report. Swinburne University of Technology. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2019-12/apo-nid268156.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angel, K. (2022). Tomorrow sex will be good again: Women and desire in the age of consent. Verso Books. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607211031423
   Google Scholar
• Badal, H. J., Stryker, J. E., DeLuca, N., & Purcell, D. W. (2018). Swipe right: Dating website and app use among men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 22(4), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1882-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. (2021). Queering consent: Negotiating critical consent in les-bi-trans-queer BDSM contexts. Sexualities, 24(5–6), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720973902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermeister, J. A., Giguere, R., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ventuneac, A., & Eisenberg, A. (2010). Perceived risks and protective strategies employed by young men who have sex with men (YMSM) when seeking online sexual partners. Journal of Health Communication, 15(6), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.499597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903075226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Senn, C. Y., & McCaw, J. (2014). Navigating ambivalence: How heterosexual young adults make sense of desire differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cense, M., Bay-Cheng, L., & Dijk, L. V. (2018). ‘Do I score points if I say “no”?’: Negotiating sexual boundaries in a changing normative landscape. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 2(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868018X15266373560443
   Google Scholar
• Corriero, E. F., & Tong, S. T. (2016). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915614872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowling, M. (2005). Rape, communicative sexuality and sex education. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 17–28). Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249995
   Google Scholar
• de Heer, B., Brown, M., & Cheney, J. (2021). Sexual consent and communication among the sexual minoritized: The role of heteronormative sex education, trauma, and dual identities. Feminist Criminology, 16(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211034560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzel, C. (2021a). That’s straight-up rape culture”: Manifestations of rape culture on Grindr. In J. Bailey, A. Flynn, & N. Henry (Eds.), The Emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 351–368). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211026
   Google Scholar
• Dietzel, C. (2021b). Sexual violence facilitated by dating apps: The experiences of men who have sex with men. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. McGill University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2572543286/abstract/FD3EBBAA915A473BPQ/1
   Google Scholar
• Dietzel, C. (2022a). I’m not your fantasy”: Sexual racism, racial fetishization, and the exploitation of racialized men who have sex with men. In J. J. Fellows & L. Smith (Eds.), Gender, sex, and tech! An intersectional feminist guide (pp. 101–120). Canadian Scholars/Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietzel, C. (2022b). The three dimensions of unsolicited dick pics: Sexual minority men’s experiences of sending and receiving unsolicited dick pics on dating apps. Sexuality & Culture, 26(3), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09920-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, C., & Birnholtz, J. (2018). “I shut the door”: Interactions, tensions, and negotiations from a location-based social app. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2469–2488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817725064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., & Becker, A. (2020). “A situation where there aren’t rules”: Unwanted sex for gay, bisexual, and questioning men. Sociological Science, 7, 57–74. http://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 16(4), 347–365. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2018). Yes means yes and no means no, but both these mantras need to go: Communication myths in consent education and anti-rape activism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 155–178. http://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1435900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindes, S., & Fileborn, B. (2020). “Girl power gone wrong”: #MeToo, Aziz Ansari, and media reporting of (grey area) sexual violence. Feminist Media Studies, 20(5), 639–656. http://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1606843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. (2004). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 209–225). Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249995
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(4), 307–315. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701586706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T., & Herold, E. (2003). Should universities and colleges mandate sexual behavior? Student perceptions of Antioch College’s consent policy. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 15(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v15n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T., & Herold, E. (2007). Sexual consent in heterosexual relationships: Development of a new measure. Sex Roles, 57(3–4), 305–315. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9264-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R. (2017). Gay men’s construction and management of identity on Grindr. Sexuality & Culture, 21(1), 187–204. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9389-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, R. B. (2020). Understanding the motivations for using Tinder. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 21(1), 66–73. http://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1744697
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, K. A., & Willis, D. G. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 14(5), 726–735. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304263638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., O’Neil, A. M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2022). Sexual consent cues among sexual minority men in the United States. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(4), 863–879. http://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1936141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., & Willis, M. (2023). Examining substance-involved sexual experiences and consent communication by sexual identity. Psychology and Sexuality, 14(1), 279–293. http://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2022.2106884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, J. L., Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2022). Gender and sexual minority status as predictors of sexual consent attitudes among cisgender young adults. Psychology and Sexuality, 13(5), 1288–1302. http://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.2018354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M. (2015). “Just say yes” - Sexual consent and boundary setting on-and offline: An international perspective of men of varying sexual orientations. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Trent University. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/just-say-yes-sexual-consent-boundary-setting-on/docview/1797427426/se-2
   Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M., Lachowsky, N. J., & Milhausen, R. R. (2015). The positive impact of technology on young gay men’s dating and sexual relationships in Canada: Results from a focus group study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(1), 19–38. http://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2014.935552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M., Skakoon-Sparling, S., Levere, D., Sezlik, S., & Humphreys, T. P. (2020). Is there space for our stories? An examination of North American and Western European gay, bi, and other men who have sex with men’s non-consensual sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(8), 1014–1025. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1767023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, S., Powell, A., & Sandy, L. (2019). “Typical scripts” and their silences: Exploring myths about sexual violence and LGBTQ people from the perspectives of support workers. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 31(3), 333–348. http://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2019.1639287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowlabocus, S. (2016). Gaydar culture: Gay men, technology and embodiment in the digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315583822
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, M., & Smith, J. A. (1998). The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3(1), 65–83. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.1998.tb00556.x
   Google Scholar
• Oueis, J., McKie, R. M., & Reissing, E. D. (2023). A qualitative account of coping following non-consensual sexual experiences among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2220694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. http://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Pineau, L. (1989). Date rape: A feminist analysis. Law and Philosophy, 8(2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineau, L. (1996). A response to my critics. In L. Francis (Ed.), Date rape: Feminism, philosophy and the law (pp. 63–107). Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Race, K. (2015). Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: Online hook-up devices in gay life. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 496–511. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.930181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, E., Holloway, I., Winetrobe, H., Rhoades, H., Barman-Adhikari, A., Gibbs, J., Carranza, A., Dent, D., & Dunlap, S. (2012). Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 3(4), 1–8. http://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.S4-005
   Google Scholar
• Shumlich, E. J., & Fisher, W. A. (2018). Affirmative sexual consent? Direct and unambiguous consent is rarely included in discussions of recent sexual interactions. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(3), 248–260. http://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2017-0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sternin, S., McKie, R. M., Winberg, C., Travers, R. N., Humphreys, T. P., & Reissing, E. D. (2022). Sexual consent: Exploring the perceptions of heterosexual and non-heterosexual men. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(3), 512–534. http://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1879911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, E. J., & Gurevich, M. (2021). Difference or dysfunction? Deconstructing desire in the DSM-5 diagnosis of female sexual interest/arousal disorder. Feminism & Psychology, 31(1), 81–98. http://doi.org/10.1177/0959353521989536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S., Hargons, C. N., Malone, N., Iyiewuare, P., Jester, J. K., & Stevens-Watkins, D. (2022). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of Black women’s meaning and experiences of sexual anxiety. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2156449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar