Digital imaging in pathology: theoretical and practical considerations, and applications

References

• Leong AS-Y, James C, Thomas A. Handbook of Surgical Pathology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1996; 43–100, 177–92.
   Google Scholar
• Leong FJ, Leong AS-Y. Digital imaging applications in anatomical pathology. Adv Anat Pathol 2003; 10: 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Leong AS-Y. Synoptic/checklist reporting of breast biopsies: Has the time come? Breast J 2001; 7: 271–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schubert E, Gross W, Sideritis RH, Deckenbaugh L, He F, Becich MJ. A pathologist-designed imaging system for anatomic pathology signout, teaching, and research. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11: 263–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz D, Seixas M. Surgical pathology system for gross specimen examination. Proc AMIA Symp 1999 236–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belanger AJ, Lopes AE, Sinard JH. Implementation of a practical digital imaging system for routine gross photography in an autopsy environment. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 124: 160–5.
   Google Scholar
• Marchevsky AM, Dulbandzhyan R, Seely K, Carey S, Duncan RG. Storage and distribution of pathology digital images using integrated Web-based viewing systems. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 126: 533–9.
   Google Scholar
• Park R, Eom J, Park P, Lee K, Joo H. Automation of gross photography using a remote-controlled digital camera system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127: 726–31.
   Google Scholar
• Leong AS-Y, Visinoni F, Visinoni C, Milios J. An advanced digital image-capture computer system for gross specimens: a substitute for gross description. Pathology 2000; 32: 131–5.
   Google Scholar
• Likar B, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA, Pernus F. Retrospective shading correction based on entropy minimisation. J Microsc 2000; 197: 285–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong FJ, Brady M, McGee JO. Correction of uneven illumination (vignetting) in digital microscopy images. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 619–21.
   Google Scholar
• Leong FJW-M, McGee JOD. Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists. J Pathol 2001; 193: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Visinoni F, Milios J, Leong AS-Y, Boon ME, Kok LP. Ultra rapid microwave/variable pressure-induced tissue processing - description of a new tissue processor. J Histotechnol 1998; 21: 219–24.
   Google Scholar
• Leong AS-Y, Leong FJW-M. Telepathology - the system for Australia. National Telepathology Conference, Sydney, Australia, 5–6 October 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Leong FJW-M, Graham AK, Gahm T, McGee JOD. Telepathology: Clinical utility and methodology. In: Underwood J, editor. Recent Advances in Histopathology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 217–40.
   Google Scholar
• Eide TJ, Nordrum I. Frozen section service via the telenetwork in Northern Norway. Zentralbl Pathol 1992; 138: 409–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kayser K. Telepathology in Europe. Its practical use. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol 1995; 43: 196–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordrum I, Engum B, Rinde E, et al. Remote frozen section service: a telepathology project to northern Norway. Hum Pathol 1991; 22: 514–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordrum I, Eide TJ. Remote frozen section service in Norway. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol 1995; 43: 253–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberholzer M, Fischer HR, Christen H, et al. Telepathology: frozen section diagnosis at a distance. Virchows Arch 1995; 426: 3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzmann P, Binder B, Kaser M, Klose R. European field tests with HISTKOM telepathology equipment. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 64: 192–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wellnitz U, Fritz P, Voudouri V, et al. The validity of telepathological frozen section diagnosis with ISDN-mediated remote microscopy. Virchows Arch 2000; 437: 52–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellnitz U, Binder B, Fritz P, Friedel G, Schwarzmann P. Reliability of telepathology for frozen section service. Anal Cell Pathol 2000; 21: 213–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosavljevic I, Spasic P, Mihailovic D, et al. Telepathology - second opinion network in Yugoslavia. Adv Clin Pathol 1998; 2: 156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, et al. Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1283–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Mea V, Beltrami CA. Telepathology applications of the Internet multimedia electronic mail. Med Inform (London) 1998; 23: 237–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minervini MI, Yagi Y, Marino IR, et al. Development and experience with an integrated system for transplantation telepathology. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1334–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Communications System Technology & Standard Division. United States Federal Standard 1037C. Telecommunications: Glossary of telecommunication terms. USA: General Services Administration, 1996. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/fs-1037/. Accessed February 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Kim I, Choi J, Yeom B, Leong AS-Y. Practical telepathology using a digital camera and the Internet. Telemed J E Health 2002; 8: 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn BE, Almagro UA, Choi H, et al. Dynamic robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study. Hum Pathol 1997; 28: 8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn BE, Choi H, Almagro UA, Recla DL, Krupinski EA, Weinstein RS. Routine surgical telepathology in the Department of Veterans Affairs: experience-related improvements in pathologist performance in 2200 cases. Telemed J 1999; 5: 323–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn BE, Choi H, Almagro UA, Recla DL. Combined robotic and nonrobotic telepathology as an integral service component of a geographically dispersed laboratory network. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1300–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazir MH, Loane MA, Wootton R. A pilot study of low-cost dynamic telepathology using the public telephone network. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4: 168–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afework A, Beynon MD, Bustamante F, et al. Digital dynamic telepathology - the Virtual Microscope. Proc AMIA Symp 1998; 912–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kayser K. Telepathology, images, and multimedia archives. Adv Clin Pathol 1998; 2: 157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kayser K, Syzmas J, Weinstein R. Telepathology - Telecommunica-tion, Electronic Education and Publication in Pathology. Berlin: Springer, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Demichelis F, Barbareschi M, Dalla Palma P, Forti S. The virtual case: a new method to completely digitize cytological and histological slides. Virchows Arch 2002; 441: 159–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong FJW-M, Graham AK, Schwarzmann P, McGee JOD. Clinical trial of telepathology as an alternative modality in breast histopathol-ogy quality assurance. Telemed J E Health 2000; 6: 373–7.
   Google Scholar
• Leong FJW-M, McGee JOD. Robotic interactive telepathology in proficiency testing/quality assurance schemes. Electr J Pathol Histol 2001; 7(2): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Boon AP, Williamson P, Brown JM, Thomas GD. The Yorkshire slide exchange external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. Cytopathol-ogy 1996; 7: 90–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong FJW-M. An automated diagnostic system for tubular carcinoma of the breast - a model for computer-based cancer diagnosis. Oxford: Oxford University; 2002. DPhil. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Ashfaq R, Liang Y, Saboorian MH. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 31–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boon ME, Beck S, Kok LP. Semiautomatic PAPNET analysis of proliferating (MiB-1-positive) cells in cervical cytology and histology. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 423–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cenci M, Nagar C, Giovagnoli MR, Vecchione A. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits. Anticancer Res 1997; 17: 4731–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon HM, Frist S. PAPNET testing for HSILs. The few cell/small cell challenge. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 253–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan Ti. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Compar-ing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 214–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan Ti, Taylor DD. AutoPap system detection of infections and benign cellular changes: results from primary screener clinical trials. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 21: 355–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten SF Jr, Lee JS, Wilbur DC, et al. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study. Cancer 1997; 81: 337–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton PW, Bartels PH, Thompson D, Anderson NH, Montironi R, Sloan JM. Automated location of dysplastic fields in colorectal histology using image texture analysis. J Pathol 1997; 182: 68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan Si, Diamond J, McCluggage WG, et al. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). J Pathol 2000; 192: 351–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison ML, McCluggage WG, Price GJ, et al. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia. J Pathol 2002; 197: 403–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels PH, Thompson D, Bartels HG, Montironi R, Scarpelli M, Hamilton PW. Machine vision-based histometry of premalignant and malignant prostatic lesions. Pathol Res Pract 1995; 191: 935–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels PH, Thompson D, Montironi R, Hamilton PW, Scarpelli M. Diagnostic decision support for prostate lesions. Pathol Res Pract 1995; 191: 945–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montironi R, Bartels PH, Thompson D, Scarpelli M, Hamilton PW. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Performance of Bayesian belief network for diagnosis and grading. J Pathol 1995; 177: 153–62.
   Google Scholar
• Montironi R, Bartels PH, Hamilton PW, Thompson D. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis) of the prostate: development of a Bayesian belief network for its distinction from well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 1996; 27: 396–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvarna SK, Ansary MA. Histopathology and the 'third great lie'. When is an image not a scientifically authentic image? Histopathology 2001; 39: 441–6.
   Google Scholar