Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast cancer in women aged 70 years and older

References

• Palombini L, Fulciniti F, Vetrani A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses. A critical analysis of 1956 cases in 8 years (1976-1984). Cancer 1988; 61: 2273–2277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sneige N. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1,995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 106–112
   Google Scholar
• Frable W J. Needle aspiration of the breast. Cancer 1984; 53: 671–676
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diab S G, Elledge R M, Clark G M. Tumour characteristics and clinical outcome of elderly women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 550–556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang W Y, Chan J K. Endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (E-DCIS) of the breast: a form of low-grade DCIS with distinctive clinicopathologic and biologic characteristics. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 921–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse G M, Ma T K, Chu W C, Lam W W, Poon C S, Chan W C. Neuroendocrine differentiation in pure type mammary mucinous carcinoma is associated with favourable histologic and immunohistochemical parameters. Mod Pathol 2004; 17: 568–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar H, Qureshi H, Volkanadsay N, Visscher D. Clinicopathologic analysis of solid papillary carcinoma of the breast and associated invasive carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30: 501–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honma N, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, et al. Breast carcinoma in women over the age of 85: distinct histological pattern and androgen, oestrogen, and progesterone receptor status. Histopathology 2003; 42: 120–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston C W, Ellis I O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histolopathological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 371–385
   Google Scholar
• Logrono R, Kurtycz D F, Inhorn S L. Criteria for reporting fine needle aspiration on palpable and nonpalpable masses of the breast. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 623–627
   Google Scholar
• Page D L, Johnson J E, Dupont W D. Probabilistic approach to the reporting of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cancer 1997; 81: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Sneige N, Staerkel G A, Caraway N P, Fanning T V, Katz R L. A plea for uniform terminology and reporting of breast fine needle aspirates. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center proposal. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 971–972
   Google Scholar
• Ayata G, Abu-Jawdeh G M, Fraser J L, Garcia L W, Upton M P, Wang H H. Accuracy and consistency in application of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 973–978
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kaisi N. The spectrum of the ‘gray zone’ in breast cytology. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 898–908
   Google Scholar
• Wang H H, Ducatman B S. Fine needle aspiration of the breast. A probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 285–289
   Google Scholar
• Stanley M W, Abele J, Kline T, Silverman J F, Skoog L. What constitutes adequate sampling of palpable breast lesions that appear benign by clinical and mammographic criteria?. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 473–482
   Google Scholar
• Kline T S. Adequacy and aspirates from the breast: a philosophical approach. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 470–472
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty A T. Fine-needle biopsy of breast: when is enough, enough?. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 373–374
   Google Scholar
• Sneige N. Should specimen adequacy be determined by the opinion of the aspirator or by the cells on the slides?. Cancer 1997; 81: 3–5
   Google Scholar
• Boerner S, Sneige N. Specimen adequacy and false-negative diagnosis rate in fine-needle aspirates of palpable breast masses. Cancer 1998; 84: 344–348
   Google Scholar
• Yu G H, Cajulis R S, De Frias D V. Tumour cell (dys) cohesion as a prognostic factor in aspirate smears of breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109: 315–319
   Google Scholar
• Schiller A B, Tadros T S, Birdsong G G, Grossl N A. Cellular dyscohesion in fine-needle aspiration of breast carcinoma. Prognostic indicator for axillary lymph node metastases?. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115: 219–223
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram G, Elsayed E M, Yaccob R B. Papillary breast lesions diagnosed on cytology. Profile of 65 cases. Acta Cytol 2007; 51: 3–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi Y D, Gong G Y, Kim M J, et al. Clinical and cytologic features of papillary neoplasms of the breast. Acta Cytol 2006; 50: 35–40
   Google Scholar
• Michael C W, Buschmann B. Can true papillary neoplasms of breast and their mimickers be accurately classified by cytology?. Cancer 2002; 96: 92–100
   Google Scholar
• Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as “papillary” by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up. Cancer 2003; 99: 156–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar