Strategies and shoes: Can we ever have enough? Teaching and using reading comprehension strategies in general and vocational programmes

References

• Aasen, P., Møller, J., Rye, E., Ottesen, E., Prøitz, T. S., & Hertzberg, F. (2012). Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform – et løft eller et løfte? Forvaltningsnivåenes og institusjonenes rolle i implementeringen av reformen. NIFU Report, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2011). Adolescents as readers. In M. L. Kamil, P. P. Afflerbach, P. D. Pearson, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, volume IV (pp. 157–176). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189–208. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asperanden, E. M. (2013). Leseopplæring på yrkesfag – det toget har vel gått? (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Bergen, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., & Kemp, L. (2012). Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1177/1558689811419514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. (2011). Understanding advanced second language reading. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Block, C. C., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension. Where we've been and where we're going. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (2nd ed., pp. 19–37). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, pp. 548–556). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C. (2007). Readings on L2 reading: Publications in other venues 2006–2007. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(2), 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C., Van Bishop, T., Yu, X., & Anderson, B. (2012). Readings on L2 reading: Publications in other venues 2011–2012. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M. (2014). Making implicit practice explicit: How do upper secondary teachers describe their reading comprehension strategies instruction? International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 52–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2014). “Blir dette vurdert, lærer?” Om vurdering for læring i klasserommet [«Will this be assessed, teacher?» On assessment for lerning in the classroom]. In E. Elstad & K. Helstad (Eds.), Profesjonsutvikling i skolen (pp. 191–206). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M., Fosse, B. O., & Rødnes, K. A. (2014). Language, learning, and teacher professionalism: An investigation of specialized language use among pupils, teachers, and student teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M., Olsen, R. V., & Hellekjær, G. O. (under review). The complexity of second language reading: Investigating the relationship between L1 and L2 using upper secondary level national reading tests.
   Google Scholar
• Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2010). Helping staff develop in schools. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H., & James, N. (2012). The ethical framework of research practice. In A. Briggs, M. Cole­man & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership & management (3rd ed., pp. 90–104). London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. (2007). Expanding young people's capacity to learn. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 115–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2005). Introduction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed. pp. 1–31). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, J. (2008). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 49–62. doi: 10.1007/s11217-007-9047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51–93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2015). Designing tasks which engage learners with knowledge. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Designing tasks in secondary education. Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement (pp. 13–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Comprehension instruction in action. The secondary classroom. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (2nd ed., pp. 258–270). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, G. E., Pearson, P. D., Taylor, B. M., Bauer, E. B., & Stahl, K. A. D. (2011). Socio-constructivist and political views on teachers’ implementation of two types of reading comprehension approaches in low-income schools. Theory into Practice, 50, 149–156. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2011.558444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hellekjær, G. O. (2008). A case for improved reading instruction for academic English reading proficiency. Acda Didactica Norge, 2(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hellekjær, G. O. (2009). Academic English reading proficiency at the university level: A Norwegian case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(2), 198–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hellekjær, G. O. (2012). Fra Reform 94 til Kunnskapsløftet: en sammenligning av leseferdigheter i engelsk blant avgangselever i den videregående skolen. In T. N. Hopfenbeck. M. Kjærnsli, & R. V. Olsen (Eds.), Kvalitet i norsk skole: Internasjonale og nasjonale undersøkelser av læringsutbytte og undervisning (pp. 153–171). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hellekjær, G. O., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2012). CLIL og lesing. En sammenligning av Vg3-elevers leseferdigheter og lesestrategibruk i 2002 og 2011 [A comparison of students’ reading skills and reading strategy use in upper secondary school, Year 13]. Report to the Norwegian Centre for Foreign Languages in Education, investigating students’ reading comprehension at the age of 18, comparing IB, CLIL and ordinary ESL students in upper secondary schools. In B. W. Svenhard (Ed.), CLIL: Kombinert fag- og engelskopplæring i videregående skole. Fokus på Språk, 28, 84–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Roe, A. (2010). Lese- og læringsstrategier [Reading and learning strategies]. In M. Kjærnsli & A. Roe (Eds.), På rett spor - Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 (pp. 118–137). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, E. K. N. (2013). Reading strategies in upper secondary school: How and to what extent are reading strategies taught and used in Norwegian upper secondary schools? (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2013). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkory & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral sciences (1st ed., pp. 297–319). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Afflerbach, P. P., Pearson, P. D., & Moje, E. B. (2011). Preface. Reading research in a changing era: An introduction to the Handbook of Reading Research. In M. L. Kamil, P. P. Afflerbach, P. D. Pearson, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. xiii–xxvi). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1–44. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
   Google Scholar
• Merchan, F. C. (2010). Reading strategies in English Vg1 (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20111747 doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. P. Afflerbach, P. D. Pearson, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453–486). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel [NRP]. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the sub-groups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training [UDIR]. (2012). Framework for basic skills. Oslo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training [UDIR]. (2013). Analyse av nasjonale prøver i engelsk 2013 [Analyses of national tests in English 2013]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Upload/Statistikk/Nasjonale_prover/Nasjonale_prover_engelsk_2013.pdf?epslanguage=no
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research [KD]. (2006, 2013). Læreplan for grunnskolen og videregående skole [Curriculum for elementary and secondary school]. Oslo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009. Assessment framework. Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publications. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2014-en
   Google Scholar
• Parris, S. R., & Block, C. C. (2008). Summing up. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (2nd ed., pp. 381–390). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (2011). Toward the next generation of comprehension instruction: A coda. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Comprehension going forward (pp. 243–253). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (2012). Comprehension and the common core: Can the romance survive. Presentation: Reading recovery teacher leaders, San Diego, Friday, October 19, 2012. Retrieved from http://scienceandliteracy.org/sites/scienceandliteracy.org/files/biblio/pdpearson/Comprehension_in_the_Common_Core.pptx
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Cervetti, G. N. (2013). The psychology and pedagogy of reading processes. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Educational psychology, V.VII, of handbook of psychology (2nd ed. pp. 507–554). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (1998). Comprehension strategies instruction. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 113–133). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2008). Epilogue. What the future of reading research could be. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (2nd ed., pp. 391–413). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Pittsburgh, PA: Rand Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ryen, A. (2011). Ethics and qualitative research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 416–438). Lon­don: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? (Adolescent Literacy Funders Meeting Report). New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Vårdal, M. (2010). Eg har lært å lese, sa guten, men ikkje å forstå : ei aktuell problemstilling for vidaregåande skule? (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 3–35). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Son, E. H. (2011). A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In M. L. Kamil, P. P. Afflerbach, P. D. Pearson, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 359–387). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar