776
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining school inspectors and education directors within the organisation of school inspection policy: perceptions and views

Pages 112-126 | Received 10 Feb 2015, Accepted 13 Oct 2015, Published online: 10 Feb 2016

References

  • Baxter, J., & Rönnberg, L. (2014). Inspection and the media, the media and inspection. In S. Grek & J. Lindgren (Eds.), Governing by inspection (pp. 159–172). London: Routledge.
  • Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (Eds.). (2007). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments & their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
  • Boxenbaum, E., & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. S. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism: A case of institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 178–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472–491. doi: 10.17763/haer.65.3.g3228437224v4877
  • Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (1998). Organizing organizations. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Bryck, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Carlbaum, S., Hult, A., Lindgren, J., Novak, J., Rönnberg, L., & Segerholm, C. (2014). Skolinspektion som styrning [School inspection as governing]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 23(1), 5–20.
  • Cooper, D. J., Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2008). Examining “institutionalization”: A critical theoretic perspective. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 673–701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Czarniawska, B. (2005). Karl Weick: Concepts, style and reflection. The Editorial Board of the Sociological Review, 53(Suppl. s1), 267–278.
  • Czarniawska, B. (2008). A theory of organizing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (Eds.). (2009a). Globalisation and Europeanisation in education. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (2009b). Beyond methodological “ISMS” in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In R. Cowen & A. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 1113–1127). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
  • Ehren, M. C. M. & Visscher, A. J. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies 54(1), 51–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x
  • Eisenberg, E. M., Goodall, H. L.Jr., & Tretheway, A. (2010). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Beford/St. Martin.
  • Government Act. (1998). Act relating to primary and secondary education (‘Opplæringsloven’). Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/Grunnskole/Education_Act_Norway_30_September_2010.pdf
  • Grek, S., Lawn, M., Ozga, J., & Segerholm, C. (2013). Governing by inspection? European inspectorates and the creation of a European education policy space. Comparative Education, 49(4), 486–502. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2013.787697
  • Grek, S., & Lindgren, J. (Eds.). (2014). Governing by inspection. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Grønmo, S. (2004). Samfunnsvitenskapelige metoder [Methods in social science]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Hall, J., & Sivesind, K. (2014). State school inspection policy in Norway and Sweden (2002–2012): A reconfiguration of governing modes? Journal of Education Policy, doi 10.1080/02680939.2014.945488.
  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, C. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy tools and institutional change: Comparing education policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(02), 141–165. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X0600050X
  • Helgøy, I., & Serigstad, S. (2009). Tilsyn som styringsform i forholdet mellom staten og kommunene [Supervision as a governing tool in the relationship between the state and the municipalities] (Vol. IX). University of Bergen: Stein Rokkan Center.
  • Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2003). Constructing the iron cage: Institutional theory and enactment. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organizatons: Point-counterpoint in organizational studies (pp. 195–207). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.
  • Lindgren, J. (2015). The front and back stages of Swedish school inspection: Opening the black box of judgment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(1), 58–76. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2013.838803
  • Lindgren, J., Hult, A., Segerholm, C., & Rönnberg, L. (2012). Mediating school inspection: Key dimensions and keywords in agency text production 2003–2010. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 569–590. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i4.22055
  • Manzon, M. (2007). Comparing places. In M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (pp. 85–122). Hong Kong, HK: Springer.
  • Mediås, O. A. (1996). Skoledirektørembetet i Norge—1860–1992 [The Office of the School Director in Norway—1860–1992] [In Norwegian]. Oslo: Ministry of Education, Research and Church Affairs.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2013). Metodehåndbok for tilsyn – en håndbok i metode for tilsyn etter barnehageloven og opplæringsloven [Methods for inspection – a handbook of inspection methods in compliance with the Pre-school Act and the Education Act]. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Regelverk/Tilsyn/Metode-for-tilsyn/
  • Ozga, J. (2012). Governing knowledge: Data, inspection and education policy in Europe. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(4), 439–455. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2012.735148
  • Parsons, T. (2012). (1951) The social system. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro.
  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ragin, C., & Amoroso, L. M. (2011). Constructing social research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Oaks Press/Sage.
  • Rönnberg, L. (2011). Exploring the intersection of marketisation and central state control through Swedish national school inspection. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 689–707.
  • Rönnberg, L. (2014). Justifying the need for control: Motives for Swedish national school inspection during two governments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 385–399. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.732605
  • Rönnberg, L., Lindgren, J., & Segerholm, C. (2013). In the public eye: Swedish school inspection and local newspapers: Exploring the audit–media relationship. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 178–197. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2012.701668
  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Segerholm, C. (2009). “We are doing well on QAE”: The case of Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 195–209. doi: 10.1080/02680930902734103
  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Sivesind, K. (2012). Juss + ped = sant? Om felles nasjonalt tilsyn i Oslo og Akershus 2008. [Law + Pedagogy = Truth? On regular state inspection in Oslo and Akershus counties 2008]. In H. Jakhelln & T. Welstad (Eds.), Utdanningsrettslige emner [Legal topics in education] (pp. 655–681). Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
  • Sowada, D. P. M. G., & Dedering, K. (2014). Ermessensspielräume in der Bewertungsarbeit von Schulinspektor/innen [Discretionary space in the assessment work of school inspectors]. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 4(2), 119–135. doi: 10.1007/s35834-014-0091-y
  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2002). Re-framing educational borrowing as a policy strategy. In M. Caruso & H. E. Tenorth (Eds.), Internationalization: Comparing educational systems and semantics (pp. 57–89). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Thornton, P. H., & Oscasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Weick, K. E. (2009a). Enacting an environment: Infrastructure of organizing. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization (Vol. II, pp. 189–206). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Weick, K. E. (2009b). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization (Vol. II) Chichester: Wiley.
  • de Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396. doi: 10.1080/03054980701366207

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.