The Gender Citation Gap in Human Geography: Indications from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

Literature Cited

• Aufenvenne, P., C. Haase, F. Meixner, and M. Steinbrink. 2021. Participation and communication behaviour at academic conferences—An empirical gender study at the German Congress of Geography 2019. Geoforum 126 (9):192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, J., M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, and R. Karimi. 2020. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies 1 (1):377–86. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00019.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. L. 2014. Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 3 (1):361–62. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeneder, B., P. Aufenvenne, C. Haase, P. Mayr, and M. Steinbrink. 2022. Extracting literature references in German speaking geography: The GEOcite project. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 3220:34–41. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3220/paper4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10):P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borner, K. 2010. Atlas of science: Visualizing what we know. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., R. Mutz, and H.-D. Daniel. 2007. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics 1 (3):226–38. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E. Z., A. M. White, and M. E. Gray. 2016. Solving the productivity and impact puzzle: Do men outperform women, or are metrics biased? BioScience 66 (3):245–52. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, E., and G. P. Cipriani. 2021. Gender differences in student evaluations of teaching: Identification and consequences. Publication No. 14387, IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/236418/1/dp14387.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., and R. M. Werner. 2021. Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles. JAMA Network Open 4 (7): E2114509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chignell, S. M. 2022. A missing link? Network analysis as an empirical approach for critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/cag.12767.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., and H. Zuckermann. 1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and changes in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In Advances in motivation and achievement, ed. M. W. Steinkamp and M. Maehr, 218–56. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Solla Price, D. J. 1965. Networks of scientific papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science 149 (3683):510–15. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, M., J. Sumner, and S. Mitchell. 2018. Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis 26 (3):312–27. doi: 10.1017/pan.2018.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferber, M. A., and M. Brün. 2011. The gender gap in citations: Does it persist? Feminist Economics 17 (1):151–58. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2010.541857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, G., P. Mongeon, C. Sugimoto, and V. Larivière. 2018. Gender homophily in citations. STI 2018 Conference Proceedings 23:1519–25. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2729532/view.
   Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., and P. Goeke. 2009. Geographie sei, was Geographen tun: Ein Blick hinter den Organisationsplan einer Disziplin [Geography is what geographers do: A view behind the organizational plan of a discipline]. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde 83 (3):261–80.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., A. J. Gates, R. Sinatra, and A. L. Barabási. 2020. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (9):4609–16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914221117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöns, H. 2017. Feminizing the university: The mobilities, careers, and contributions of early female academics in the University of Cambridge, 1926–1955. The Professional Geographer 69 (4):670–82. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1289778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., J. L. Crockett, and L. A. Hunter. 2008. Gendered academic careers: Specializing for success? Social Forces 86 (3):1273–1309. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerman, K., Y. Yu, F. Morstatter, and J. Pujara. 2022. Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119 (40):E2206070119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206070119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 1998. Theories of citation? Scientometrics 43 (1):5–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02458391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2022. Citational politics in tight places. Accessed May 12, 2023. https://civiclaboratory.nl/2022/03/02/citational-politics-in-tight-places/.
   Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., R. Powers, and B. F. Walter. 2013. The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization 67 (4):889–922. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2020. Dear science and other stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1):415–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho, L. I. 2021. The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards 2001–2020. Quantitative Science Studies 2 (3):976–89. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00148.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159 (3810):56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1979. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minca, C. 2018. The cosmopolitan geographer’s dilemma: Or, will national geographies survive neo-liberalism? Geographische Zeitschrift 106 (1):4–15. doi: 10.25162/gz-2018-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Mott, C., and D. Cockayne. 2017. Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of “conscientious engagement.” Gender, Place and Culture 24 (7):954–73. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte, E., and R. Rousseau. 2002. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 28 (6):441–53. doi: 10.1177/016555150202800601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, K. 2022. Mehr “Quantitatives zur quantitativen und theoretischen Revolution in der deutschsprachigen Geographie” [More quantitative research on the quantitative and theoretical revolution in German geography a citation analysis of selected geographical journals between 1950 and 1979]. Berichte Geographie und Landeskunde 95 (1):26–49. doi: 10.25162/bgl-2022-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, K. S., P. Zurn, J. D. Dworkin, D. S. Basset, and D. B. Resnik. 2022. Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. Accountability in Research 29 (8):1–15. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rossiter, M. W. 1993. The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science 23 (2):325–41. doi: 10.1177/030631293023002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr, C., M. Müller, and N. Imhof. 2020. Who makes geographical knowledge? The gender of geography’s gatekeepers. The Professional Geographer 72 (3):317–31. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1744169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In Selected Subaltern Studies, ed. R. Guha and G. C. Spivak, 3–32. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbrink, M., P. Aufenvenne, M. Köhler, B. Birkeneder, C. Haase, F. Meixner, R. Ned, and J. Wagener. 2023. GEOprof-Database: Datenbank der geographischen ProfessorInnenschaft im deutschsprachigen Raum ab 1949 [GEOprof-Database: Database of the geographical professorate in the German-speaking countries since 1949]. V. 2.0. GFZ Data Services. doi: 10.5880/fidgeo.2023.017.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, C. 2006. Trends in gender segregation by field of work in higher education. In Women in scientific careers: Unleashing the potential, ed. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 95–104. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Tekles, A., K. Auspurg, and L. Bornmann. 2022. Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias. PLoS ONE 17 (9):E0274810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templin, C. 2022. Why citation matters: Ideas on a feminist approach to research. Accessed May 12, 2023. https://blogs.fu-berlin.de/abv-gender-diversity/2022/01/10/why-citation-matters:-ideas-on-a-feminist-approach-to-research/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. R., D. J. Poole, and J. M. Herbers. 2015. Gender in science and engineering faculties: Demographic inertia revisited. PLoS ONE 10 (10):e0139767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D. M., J. Bertolero, E. Stiso, E. Cornblath, A. S. Teich, K. Blevins, C. Oudyk, A. Michael, J. Urai, C. Matelsky, et al. 2022. dalejn/cleanBib: V 1.1.2 [Data set]. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4104748.
   Google Scholar