Response to Kitchen et al.'s External quality assessment of prothrombin time: The split‐sample model compared to external quality assessment with commercial control material

U. Ørvim Sølvik Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, and Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories (NOKLUS), Norway

A. Stavelin Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, and Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories (NOKLUS), Norway

N. G. Christensen Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, and Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories (NOKLUS), Norway

S. Sandberg Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, and Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories (NOKLUS), Norway

Reference

Kitchen D., Murray E., Kitchen S., Jennings I., Fitzmaurice D., Woods T., Walker I. External quality assessment for prothrombin time/international normalised ratio using point‐of‐care devices: Split ‐ sample or conventional external quality assessment using control samples?. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2007; 67: 673–675
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sølvik U. Ø., Stavelin A., Christensen N. G., Sandberg S. External quality assessment of prothrombin time: the split‐sample model compared with external quality assement with commercial control material. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2006; 66: 337–350
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Response to Kitchen et al.'s External quality assessment of prothrombin time: The split‐sample model compared to external quality assessment with commercial control material

Reference

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Response to Kitchen et al.'s External quality assessment of prothrombin time: The split‐sample model compared to external quality assessment with commercial control material

Reference

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date