REFERENCES
- Matzen P, Hilden J, Thomsen C, Malchow-Moller A, Juhl E, Copenhagen Computer Icterus Group. Does test quality influence the outcome of algo- rithmic classifications of jaundiced patients? IV International Meeting on Clinical Laboratory Organization and Management, Uppsala, June 1983. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997; 44 Suppl 171: 35–40.
- Cooper GR, Myers GL, Smith SJ, Schlant RC. Blood lipid measurements. Variations and practical utility. JAMA 1992; 267: 1652–60.
- Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DWM, Simpson H, Peto TEA, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR, OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. Pros-pective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 2932–39.
- Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995; 274: 645–51.
- Bandolier, p. 1, issue no 61; 1999. http:// www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/Bandolier
- Pannall P, Marshall W, Jabor A, Magid E. A strategy to promote the rational use of laboratory tests. Committee report from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, IFCC. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 244: 121–7.
- Mayer M, Wilkinson I, Heikkinen R, Orntoft T, Magid E. Improved laboratory test selection and enhanced perception of test results as tools for cost-effective medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 683— 90.
- Sandberg S. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests—a new challenge for laboratory medicine. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997; 57: 369–72.
- Bruns D, Huth EJ, Magid E, Young DS. Toward a checklist for reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 2211.